Tackling One Health Risks: How Large Language Models are leveraged for Risk Negotiation and Consensus-building

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.09906v1
• Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2025 00:25:20 GMT
• Title: Tackling One Health Risks: How Large Language Models are leveraged for Risk Negotiation and Consensus-building
• Authors: Alexandra Fetsch, Iurii Savvateev, Racem Ben Romdhane, Martin Wiedmann, Artemiy Dimov, Maciej Durkalec, Josef Teichmann, Jakob Zinsstag, Konstantinos Koutsoumanis, Andreja Rajkovic, Jason Mann, Mauro Tonolla, Monika Ehling-Schulz, Matthias Filter, Sophia Johler,
• Abstract summary: This study presents an AI-assisted negotiation framework that incorporates large language models (LLMs) and AI-based autonomous agents.<n>The framework enables stakeholders to simulate negotiations, systematically model dynamics, anticipate compromises, and evaluate solution impacts.
• Score: 28.130694535835207
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Key global challenges of our times are characterized by complex interdependencies and can only be effectively addressed through an integrated, participatory effort. Conventional risk analysis frameworks often reduce complexity to ensure manageability, creating silos that hinder comprehensive solutions. A fundamental shift towards holistic strategies is essential to enable effective negotiations between different sectors and to balance the competing interests of stakeholders. However, achieving this balance is often hindered by limited time, vast amounts of information, and the complexity of integrating diverse perspectives. This study presents an AI-assisted negotiation framework that incorporates large language models (LLMs) and AI-based autonomous agents into a negotiation-centered risk analysis workflow. The framework enables stakeholders to simulate negotiations, systematically model dynamics, anticipate compromises, and evaluate solution impacts. By leveraging LLMs' semantic analysis capabilities we could mitigate information overload and augment decision-making process under time constraints. Proof-of-concept implementations were conducted in two real-world scenarios: (i) prudent use of a biopesticide, and (ii) targeted wild animal population control. Our work demonstrates the potential of AI-assisted negotiation to address the current lack of tools for cross-sectoral engagement. Importantly, the solution's open source, web based design, suits for application by a broader audience with limited resources and enables users to tailor and develop it for their own needs.

Related papers

• Agentic AI for Autonomous, Explainable, and Real-Time Credit Risk Decision-Making [0.0]
  This paper presents an Agentic AI framework, or a system where AI agents view the world of dynamic credit independent of human observers.<n>The research introduces a multi-agent system with reinforcing learning, natural language reasoning, explainable AI modules, and real-time data absorption pipelines.<n>Findings indicate that decision speed, transparency and responsiveness is better than traditional credit scoring models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T23:30:38Z)
• An Agentic Framework with LLMs for Solving Complex Vehicle Routing Problems [66.60904891478687]
  We propose an Agentic Framework with LLMs (AFL) for solving complex vehicle routing problems.<n>AFL directly extracts knowledge from raw inputs and enables self-contained code generation.<n>We show that AFL substantially outperforms existing LLM-based baselines in both code reliability and solution feasibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-19T03:59:25Z)
• Learning to Interact in World Latent for Team Coordination [53.51290193631586]
  This work presents a novel representation learning framework, interactive world latent (IWoL), to facilitate team coordination in multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL)<n>Our key insight is to construct a learnable representation space that jointly captures inter-agent relations and task-specific world information by directly modeling communication protocols.<n>Our representation can be used not only as an implicit latent for each agent, but also as an explicit message for communication.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T22:13:39Z)
• Multi-Turn Puzzles: Evaluating Interactive Reasoning and Strategic Dialogue in LLMs [21.192619293355502]
  Large language models (LLMs) excel at solving problems with clear and complete statements, but often struggle with nuanced environments.<n>This benchmark provides valuable insights into the strengths and weaknesses of current LLMs in handling complex, interactive scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-13T19:14:45Z)
• An Outlook on the Opportunities and Challenges of Multi-Agent AI Systems [32.48561526824382]
  A multi-agent AI system (MAS) is composed of multiple autonomous agents that interact, exchange information, and make decisions based on internal generative models.<n>This paper outlines a formal framework for analyzing MAS, focusing on two core aspects: effectiveness and safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T22:05:19Z)
• Towards Agentic Recommender Systems in the Era of Multimodal Large Language Models [75.4890331763196]
  Recent breakthroughs in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to the emergence of agentic AI systems.<n>LLM-based Agentic RS (LLM-ARS) can offer more interactive, context-aware, and proactive recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T22:37:15Z)
• An Overview of Large Language Models for Statisticians [109.38601458831545]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as transformative tools in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>This paper explores potential areas where statisticians can make important contributions to the development of LLMs.<n>We focus on issues such as uncertainty quantification, interpretability, fairness, privacy, watermarking and model adaptation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-25T03:40:36Z)
• Agentic LLM Framework for Adaptive Decision Discourse [2.4919169815423743]
  This study introduces a real-world inspired agentic Large Language Models (LLMs) framework.<n>Unlike traditional decision-support tools, the framework emphasizes dialogue, trade-off exploration, and the emergent synergies generated by interactions among agents.<n>Results reveal how the breadth-first exploration of alternatives fosters robust and equitable recommendation pathways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T03:46:37Z)
• Protocol Learning, Decentralized Frontier Risk and the No-Off Problem [56.74434512241989]
  We identify a third paradigm - Protocol Learning - where models are trained across decentralized networks of incentivized participants.<n>This approach has the potential to aggregate orders of magnitude more computational resources than any single centralized entity.<n>It also introduces novel challenges: heterogeneous and unreliable nodes, malicious participants, the need for unextractable models to preserve incentives, and complex governance dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T19:53:50Z)
• Cooperate or Collapse: Emergence of Sustainable Cooperation in a Society of LLM Agents [101.17919953243107]
  GovSim is a generative simulation platform designed to study strategic interactions and cooperative decision-making in large language models (LLMs)<n>We find that all but the most powerful LLM agents fail to achieve a sustainable equilibrium in GovSim, with the highest survival rate below 54%.<n>We show that agents that leverage "Universalization"-based reasoning, a theory of moral thinking, are able to achieve significantly better sustainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T15:59:16Z)
• A Survey on Human-AI Collaboration with Large Foundation Models [11.837685062760132]
  Human-AI (HAI) Collaboration has become pivotal for advancing problem-solving and decision-making processes.<n>The advent of Large Foundation Models (LFMs) has greatly expanded its potential, offering unprecedented capabilities.<n>This paper reviews the crucial integration of LFMs with HAI, highlighting both opportunities and risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T22:37:49Z)
• Reasoning Capacity in Multi-Agent Systems: Limitations, Challenges and Human-Centered Solutions [14.398238217358116]
  We present a formal definition of reasoning capacity and illustrate its utility in identifying limitations within each component of the system. We then argue how these limitations can be addressed with a self-reflective process wherein human-feedback is used to alleviate shortcomings in reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T02:53:11Z)
• Cooperation, Competition, and Maliciousness: LLM-Stakeholders Interactive Negotiation [52.930183136111864]
  We propose using scorable negotiation to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) To reach an agreement, agents must have strong arithmetic, inference, exploration, and planning capabilities. We provide procedures to create new games and increase games' difficulty to have an evolving benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-29T13:33:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.