Reasoning Capacity in Multi-Agent Systems: Limitations, Challenges and Human-Centered Solutions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.01108v1
• Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2024 02:53:11 GMT
• Title: Reasoning Capacity in Multi-Agent Systems: Limitations, Challenges and Human-Centered Solutions
• Authors: Pouya Pezeshkpour, Eser Kandogan, Nikita Bhutani, Sajjadur Rahman, Tom Mitchell, Estevam Hruschka
• Abstract summary: We present a formal definition of reasoning capacity and illustrate its utility in identifying limitations within each component of the system. We then argue how these limitations can be addressed with a self-reflective process wherein human-feedback is used to alleviate shortcomings in reasoning.
• Score: 14.398238217358116
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Remarkable performance of large language models (LLMs) in a variety of tasks brings forth many opportunities as well as challenges of utilizing them in production settings. Towards practical adoption of LLMs, multi-agent systems hold great promise to augment, integrate, and orchestrate LLMs in the larger context of enterprise platforms that use existing proprietary data and models to tackle complex real-world tasks. Despite the tremendous success of these systems, current approaches rely on narrow, single-focus objectives for optimization and evaluation, often overlooking potential constraints in real-world scenarios, including restricted budgets, resources and time. Furthermore, interpreting, analyzing, and debugging these systems requires different components to be evaluated in relation to one another. This demand is currently not feasible with existing methodologies. In this postion paper, we introduce the concept of reasoning capacity as a unifying criterion to enable integration of constraints during optimization and establish connections among different components within the system, which also enable a more holistic and comprehensive approach to evaluation. We present a formal definition of reasoning capacity and illustrate its utility in identifying limitations within each component of the system. We then argue how these limitations can be addressed with a self-reflective process wherein human-feedback is used to alleviate shortcomings in reasoning and enhance overall consistency of the system.

Related papers

• Optimizing Large Language Models for Dynamic Constraints through Human-in-the-Loop Discriminators [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have recently demonstrated impressive capabilities across various real-world applications. We propose a flexible framework that enables LLMs to interact with system interfaces, summarize constraint concepts, and continually optimize performance metrics. Our framework achieved a $7.78%$ pass rate with the human discriminator and a $6.11%$ pass rate with the LLM-based discriminator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-19T17:27:38Z)
• Embodied Agent Interface: Benchmarking LLMs for Embodied Decision Making [85.24399869971236]
  We aim to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) for embodied decision making. Existing evaluations tend to rely solely on a final success rate. We propose a generalized interface (Embodied Agent Interface) that supports the formalization of various types of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:59:00Z)
• BloomWise: Enhancing Problem-Solving capabilities of Large Language Models using Bloom's-Taxonomy-Inspired Prompts [59.83547898874152]
  We introduce BloomWise, a new prompting technique, inspired by Bloom's taxonomy, to improve the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) The decision regarding the need to employ more sophisticated cognitive skills is based on self-evaluation performed by the LLM. In extensive experiments across 4 popular math reasoning datasets, we have demonstrated the effectiveness of our proposed approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T09:27:52Z)
• Optimal Decision Making Through Scenario Simulations Using Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have transformed how complex problems are approached and solved. This paper proposes an innovative approach to bridge this capability gap. By enabling LLMs to request multiple potential options and their respective parameters from users, our system introduces a dynamic framework. This function is designed to analyze the provided options, simulate potential outcomes, and determine the most advantageous solution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T01:23:09Z)
• MR-Ben: A Meta-Reasoning Benchmark for Evaluating System-2 Thinking in LLMs [55.20845457594977]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown increasing capability in problem-solving and decision-making. We present a process-based benchmark MR-Ben that demands a meta-reasoning skill. Our meta-reasoning paradigm is especially suited for system-2 slow thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T03:50:23Z)
• Can Long-Context Language Models Subsume Retrieval, RAG, SQL, and More? [54.667202878390526]
  Long-context language models (LCLMs) have the potential to revolutionize our approach to tasks traditionally reliant on external tools like retrieval systems or databases. We introduce LOFT, a benchmark of real-world tasks requiring context up to millions of tokens designed to evaluate LCLMs' performance on in-context retrieval and reasoning. Our findings reveal LCLMs' surprising ability to rival state-of-the-art retrieval and RAG systems, despite never having been explicitly trained for these tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T00:28:58Z)
• Meta Reasoning for Large Language Models [58.87183757029041]
  We introduce Meta-Reasoning Prompting (MRP), a novel and efficient system prompting method for large language models (LLMs) MRP guides LLMs to dynamically select and apply different reasoning methods based on the specific requirements of each task. We evaluate the effectiveness of MRP through comprehensive benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T16:14:11Z)
• Beyond LLMs: Advancing the Landscape of Complex Reasoning [0.35813349058229593]
  EC AI platform takes a neuro-symbolic approach to solving constraint satisfaction and optimization problems. System employs precise and high performance logical reasoning engine. System supports developers in specifying application logic in natural and concise language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T21:14:45Z)
• Solution-oriented Agent-based Models Generation with Verifier-assisted Iterative In-context Learning [10.67134969207797]
  Agent-based models (ABMs) stand as an essential paradigm for proposing and validating hypothetical solutions or policies. Large language models (LLMs) encapsulating cross-domain knowledge and programming proficiency could potentially alleviate the difficulty of this process. We present SAGE, a general solution-oriented ABM generation framework designed for automatic modeling and generating solutions for targeted problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T07:59:06Z)
• Large Process Models: Business Process Management in the Age of Generative AI [4.249492423406116]
  Large Process Model (LPM) combines correlation power of Large Language Models with analytical precision and reliability of knowledge-based systems and automated reasoning approaches. LPM would allow organizations to receive context-specific (tailored) process and other business models, analytical deep-dives, and improvement recommendations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T10:32:53Z)
• Automatically Correcting Large Language Models: Surveying the landscape of diverse self-correction strategies [104.32199881187607]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable performance across a wide array of NLP tasks. A promising approach to rectify these flaws is self-correction, where the LLM itself is prompted or guided to fix problems in its own output. This paper presents a comprehensive review of this emerging class of techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-06T18:38:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.