Compressed Video Quality Enhancement: Classifying and Benchmarking over Standards

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10407v2
• Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 15:24:32 GMT
• Title: Compressed Video Quality Enhancement: Classifying and Benchmarking over Standards
• Authors: Xiem HoangVan, Dang BuiDinh, Sang NguyenQuang, Wen-Hsiao Peng,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel taxonomy classifying CVQE methods across architectural paradigms, coding standards, and compressed-domain feature utilization.<n>Second, it proposes a unified benchmarking framework integrating modern compression protocols and standard test sequences for fair multi-criteria evaluation.<n>Third, it provides a systematic analysis of the critical trade-offs between reconstruction performance and computational complexity observed in state-of-the-art methods.
• Score: 7.991926266678548
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Compressed video quality enhancement (CVQE) is crucial for improving user experience with lossy video codecs like H.264/AVC, H.265/HEVC, and H.266/VVC. While deep learning based CVQE has driven significant progress, existing surveys still suffer from limitations: lack of systematic classification linking methods to specific standards and artifacts, insufficient comparative analysis of architectural paradigms across coding types, and underdeveloped benchmarking practices. To address these gaps, this paper presents three key contributions. First, it introduces a novel taxonomy classifying CVQE methods across architectural paradigms, coding standards, and compressed-domain feature utilization. Second, it proposes a unified benchmarking framework integrating modern compression protocols and standard test sequences for fair multi-criteria evaluation. Third, it provides a systematic analysis of the critical trade-offs between reconstruction performance and computational complexity observed in state-of-the-art methods and highlighting promising directions for future research. This comprehensive review aims to establish a foundation for consistent assessment and informed model selection in CVQE research and deployment.

Related papers

• CAMP-VQA: Caption-Embedded Multimodal Perception for No-Reference Quality Assessment of Compressed Video [9.172799792564009]
  We propose CAMP-VQA, a novel NR-VQA framework that exploits the semantic understanding capabilities of large models.<n>Our approach introduces a quality-aware video metadata mechanism that integrates key fragments extracted from inter-frame variations.<n>Our model consistently outperforms existing NR-VQA methods, achieving improved accuracy without the need for costly manual fine-grained annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T16:37:47Z)
• VQAThinker: Exploring Generalizable and Explainable Video Quality Assessment via Reinforcement Learning [50.34205095371895]
  Video quality assessment aims to objectively quantify perceptual quality degradation.<n>Existing VQA models suffer from two critical limitations.<n>We propose textbfVQAThinker, a reasoning-based VQA framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-08T06:16:23Z)
• Compressed Feature Quality Assessment: Dataset and Baselines [89.62929964441962]
  We propose the first benchmark dataset for evaluating semantic fidelity of compressed features.<n>We systematically assess three widely used metrics -- MSE, cosine similarity, and Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) -- in terms of their ability to capture semantic degradation.<n>This work advances the field by establishing a foundational benchmark and providing a critical resource for the community to explore CFQA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-09T04:16:39Z)
• Breaking Annotation Barriers: Generalized Video Quality Assessment via Ranking-based Self-Supervision [49.46606936180063]
  Video quality assessment (VQA) is essential for quantifying quality in various video processing systems.<n>We introduce a self-supervised learning framework for VQA to learn quality assessment capabilities from large-scale, unlabeled web videos.<n>By training on a dataset $10times$ larger than the existing VQA benchmarks, our model achieves zero-shot performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-06T15:29:32Z)
• IQPFR: An Image Quality Prior for Blind Face Restoration and Beyond [56.99331967165238]
  Blind Face Restoration (BFR) addresses the challenge of reconstructing degraded low-quality (LQ) facial images into high-quality (HQ) outputs.<n>We propose a novel framework that incorporates an Image Quality Prior (IQP) derived from No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) models.<n>Our method outperforms state-of-the-art techniques across multiple benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T11:39:51Z)
• ReLaX-VQA: Residual Fragment and Layer Stack Extraction for Enhancing Video Quality Assessment [35.00766551093652]
  ReLaX-VQA is a novel No-Reference Video Quality Assessment (NRVQA) model.<n>It aims to address the challenges of evaluating the quality of diverse video content without reference to the original uncompressed videos.<n>It consistently outperforms existing NR-VQA methods, achieving an average S-Score of 0.8658 and PLCC of 0.8873.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T08:33:55Z)
• Hybrid Contrastive Quantization for Efficient Cross-View Video Retrieval [55.088635195893325]
  We propose the first quantized representation learning method for cross-view video retrieval, namely Hybrid Contrastive Quantization (HCQ) HCQ learns both coarse-grained and fine-grained quantizations with transformers, which provide complementary understandings for texts and videos. Experiments on three Web video benchmark datasets demonstrate that HCQ achieves competitive performance with state-of-the-art non-compressed retrieval methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T18:04:10Z)
• Regression or Classification? New Methods to Evaluate No-Reference Picture and Video Quality Models [45.974399400141685]
  We propose two new methods to evaluate and compare no-reference quality models at coarser levels. We conduct a benchmark experiment of popular no-reference quality models on recent in-the-wild picture and video quality datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T05:40:14Z)
• Study on the Assessment of the Quality of Experience of Streaming Video [117.44028458220427]
  In this paper, the influence of various objective factors on the subjective estimation of the QoE of streaming video is studied. The paper presents standard and handcrafted features, shows their correlation and p-Value of significance. We take SQoE-III database, so far the largest and most realistic of its kind.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-08T18:46:09Z)
• UGC-VQA: Benchmarking Blind Video Quality Assessment for User Generated Content [59.13821614689478]
  Blind quality prediction of in-the-wild videos is quite challenging, since the quality degradations of content are unpredictable, complicated, and often commingled. Here we contribute to advancing the problem by conducting a comprehensive evaluation of leading VQA models. By employing a feature selection strategy on top of leading VQA model features, we are able to extract 60 of the 763 statistical features used by the leading models. Our experimental results show that VIDEVAL achieves state-of-theart performance at considerably lower computational cost than other leading models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-29T00:39:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.