Safety and Security Analysis of Large Language Models: Benchmarking Risk Profile and Harm Potential
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.10655v2
- Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 02:00:08 GMT
- Title: Safety and Security Analysis of Large Language Models: Benchmarking Risk Profile and Harm Potential
- Authors: Charankumar Akiri, Harrison Simpson, Kshitiz Aryal, Aarav Khanna, Maanak Gupta,
- Abstract summary: This research provides an empirical analysis and risk profile of nine prominent Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>The RSI is an agile and scalable evaluation score, to quantify and compare the security posture and creating a risk profile of LLMs.<n>This research finds widespread vulnerabilities in the safety filters of the LLMs tested and highlights the urgent need for stronger alignment, responsible deployment practices, and model governance.
- Score: 0.1631115063641726
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
- Abstract: While the widespread deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs) holds great potential for society, their vulnerabilities to adversarial manipulation and exploitation can pose serious safety, security, and ethical risks. As new threats continue to emerge, it becomes critically necessary to assess the landscape of LLMs' safety and security against evolving adversarial prompt techniques. To understand the behavior of LLMs, this research provides an empirical analysis and risk profile of nine prominent LLMs, Claude Opus 4, DeepSeek V3 (both open-source and online), Gemini 2.5 Flash, GPT-4o, Grok 3, Llama 4 Scout, Mistral 7B, and Qwen 3 1.7B, against 24 different security and safety categories. These LLMs are evaluated on their ability to produce harmful responses for adversarially crafted prompts (dataset has been made public) for a broad range of safety and security topics, such as promotion of violent criminal behavior, promotion of non-violent criminal activity, societal harms related to safety, illegal sexual content, dangerous code generation, and cybersecurity threats beyond code. Our study introduces the Risk Severity Index (RSI), an agile and scalable evaluation score, to quantify and compare the security posture and creating a risk profile of LLMs. As the LLM development landscape progresses, the RSI is intended to be a valuable metric for comparing the risks of LLMs across evolving threats. This research finds widespread vulnerabilities in the safety filters of the LLMs tested and highlights the urgent need for stronger alignment, responsible deployment practices, and model governance, particularly for open-access and rapidly iterated models.
Related papers
- Security Concerns for Large Language Models: A Survey [4.1824815480811806]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have caused a revolution in natural language processing, but their capabilities also introduce new security vulnerabilities.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive overview of these emerging concerns, categorizing threats into several key areas.<n>We conclude by emphasizing the importance of advancing robust, multi-layered security strategies to ensure LLMs are safe and beneficial.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-24T22:22:43Z) - SafeMLRM: Demystifying Safety in Multi-modal Large Reasoning Models [50.34706204154244]
Acquiring reasoning capabilities catastrophically degrades inherited safety alignment.<n>Certain scenarios suffer 25 times higher attack rates.<n>Despite tight reasoning-answer safety coupling, MLRMs demonstrate nascent self-correction.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-09T06:53:23Z) - Large Language Model Safety: A Holistic Survey [35.42419096859496]
The rapid development and deployment of large language models (LLMs) have introduced a new frontier in artificial intelligence.<n>This survey provides a comprehensive overview of the current landscape of LLM safety, covering four major categories: value misalignment, robustness to adversarial attacks, misuse, and autonomous AI risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-23T16:11:27Z) - Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones.
Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored.
We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z) - SafeBench: A Safety Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Large Language Models [75.67623347512368]
We propose toolns, a comprehensive framework designed for conducting safety evaluations of MLLMs.
Our framework consists of a comprehensive harmful query dataset and an automated evaluation protocol.
Based on our framework, we conducted large-scale experiments on 15 widely-used open-source MLLMs and 6 commercial MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-24T17:14:40Z) - Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress.
Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief.
By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z) - ALERT: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Large Language Models' Safety through Red Teaming [64.86326523181553]
ALERT is a large-scale benchmark to assess safety based on a novel fine-grained risk taxonomy.
It aims to identify vulnerabilities, inform improvements, and enhance the overall safety of the language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-06T15:01:47Z) - Securing Large Language Models: Threats, Vulnerabilities and Responsible Practices [4.593170087121314]
Large language models (LLMs) have significantly transformed the landscape of Natural Language Processing (NLP)<n>This research paper thoroughly investigates security and privacy concerns related to LLMs from five thematic perspectives.<n>The paper recommends promising avenues for future research to enhance the security and risk management of LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-19T07:10:58Z) - A Security Risk Taxonomy for Prompt-Based Interaction With Large Language Models [5.077431021127288]
This paper addresses a gap in current research by focusing on security risks posed by large language models (LLMs)
Our work proposes a taxonomy of security risks along the user-model communication pipeline and categorizes the attacks by target and attack type alongside the commonly used confidentiality, integrity, and availability (CIA) triad.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-19T20:22:05Z) - Use of LLMs for Illicit Purposes: Threats, Prevention Measures, and
Vulnerabilities [14.684194175806203]
Large language models (LLMs) can be misused for fraud, impersonation, and the generation of malware.
We present a taxonomy describing the relationship between threats caused by the generative capabilities of LLMs, prevention measures intended to address such threats, and vulnerabilities arising from imperfect prevention measures.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-24T14:45:50Z) - Safety Assessment of Chinese Large Language Models [51.83369778259149]
Large language models (LLMs) may generate insulting and discriminatory content, reflect incorrect social values, and may be used for malicious purposes.
To promote the deployment of safe, responsible, and ethical AI, we release SafetyPrompts including 100k augmented prompts and responses by LLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-20T16:27:35Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.