Translate, then Detect: Leveraging Machine Translation for Cross-Lingual Toxicity Classification

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14493v1
• Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 23:58:07 GMT
• Title: Translate, then Detect: Leveraging Machine Translation for Cross-Lingual Toxicity Classification
• Authors: Samuel J. Bell, Eduardo Sánchez, David Dale, Pontus Stenetorp, Mikel Artetxe, Marta R. Costa-jussà,
• Abstract summary: We compare translation-based and language-specific/multilingual classification pipelines.<n>We find translation benefits strongly correlated with both the resource level of the target language and the quality of the machine translation system.
• Score: 35.35733615199578
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Multilingual toxicity detection remains a significant challenge due to the scarcity of training data and resources for many languages. While prior work has leveraged the translate-test paradigm to support cross-lingual transfer across a range of classification tasks, the utility of translation in supporting toxicity detection at scale remains unclear. In this work, we conduct a comprehensive comparison of translation-based and language-specific/multilingual classification pipelines. We find that translation-based pipelines consistently outperform out-of-distribution classifiers in 81.3% of cases (13 of 16 languages), with translation benefits strongly correlated with both the resource level of the target language and the quality of the machine translation (MT) system. Our analysis reveals that traditional classifiers outperform large language model (LLM) judges, with this advantage being particularly pronounced for low-resource languages, where translate-classify methods dominate translate-judge approaches in 6 out of 7 cases. We additionally show that MT-specific fine-tuning on LLMs yields lower refusal rates compared to standard instruction-tuned models, but it can negatively impact toxicity detection accuracy for low-resource languages. These findings offer actionable guidance for practitioners developing scalable multilingual content moderation systems.

Related papers

• Translation as a Scalable Proxy for Multilingual Evaluation [41.29816736489213]
  We evaluate the validity of a simpler alternative: can translation quality alone indicate a model's broader multilingual capabilities?<n>We find that translation performance is a good indicator of downstream task success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-16T21:01:40Z)
• Low-Resource English-Tigrinya MT: Leveraging Multilingual Models, Custom Tokenizers, and Clean Evaluation Benchmarks [6.177998679139308]
  Despite advances in Neural Machine Translation (NMT), low-resource languages like Tigrinya remain underserved.<n>This paper investigates transfer learning techniques using multilingual pretrained models to enhance translation quality for morphologically rich, low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T15:02:57Z)
• T3L: Translate-and-Test Transfer Learning for Cross-Lingual Text Classification [50.675552118811]
  Cross-lingual text classification is typically built on large-scale, multilingual language models (LMs) pretrained on a variety of languages of interest. We propose revisiting the classic "translate-and-test" pipeline to neatly separate the translation and classification stages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T07:33:22Z)
• Revisiting Machine Translation for Cross-lingual Classification [91.43729067874503]
  Most research in the area focuses on the multilingual models rather than the Machine Translation component. We show that, by using a stronger MT system and mitigating the mismatch between training on original text and running inference on machine translated text, translate-test can do substantially better than previously assumed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T16:56:10Z)
• MultiTACRED: A Multilingual Version of the TAC Relation Extraction Dataset [6.7839993945546215]
  We introduce the MultiTACRED dataset, covering 12 typologically diverse languages from 9 language families. We analyze translation and annotation projection quality, identify error categories, and experimentally evaluate fine-tuned pretrained mono- and multilingual language models. We find monolingual RE model performance to be comparable to the English original for many of the target languages, and that multilingual models trained on a combination of English and target language data can outperform their monolingual counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-08T09:48:21Z)
• High-resource Language-specific Training for Multilingual Neural Machine Translation [109.31892935605192]
  We propose the multilingual translation model with the high-resource language-specific training (HLT-MT) to alleviate the negative interference. Specifically, we first train the multilingual model only with the high-resource pairs and select the language-specific modules at the top of the decoder. HLT-MT is further trained on all available corpora to transfer knowledge from high-resource languages to low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-11T14:33:13Z)
• Distributionally Robust Multilingual Machine Translation [94.51866646879337]
  We propose a new learning objective for Multilingual neural machine translation (MNMT) based on distributionally robust optimization. We show how to practically optimize this objective for large translation corpora using an iterated best response scheme. Our method consistently outperforms strong baseline methods in terms of average and per-language performance under both many-to-one and one-to-many translation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-09T03:48:35Z)
• Modelling Latent Translations for Cross-Lingual Transfer [47.61502999819699]
  We propose a new technique that integrates both steps of the traditional pipeline (translation and classification) into a single model. We evaluate our novel latent translation-based model on a series of multilingual NLU tasks. We report gains for both zero-shot and few-shot learning setups, up to 2.7 accuracy points on average.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-23T17:11:27Z)
• On the Limitations of Cross-lingual Encoders as Exposed by Reference-Free Machine Translation Evaluation [55.02832094101173]
  Evaluation of cross-lingual encoders is usually performed either via zero-shot cross-lingual transfer in supervised downstream tasks or via unsupervised cross-lingual similarity. This paper concerns ourselves with reference-free machine translation (MT) evaluation where we directly compare source texts to (sometimes low-quality) system translations. We systematically investigate a range of metrics based on state-of-the-art cross-lingual semantic representations obtained with pretrained M-BERT and LASER. We find that they perform poorly as semantic encoders for reference-free MT evaluation and identify their two key limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-03T22:10:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.