The Sound of Syntax: Finetuning and Comprehensive Evaluation of Language Models for Speech Pathology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.16765v2
• Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 14:02:00 GMT
• Title: The Sound of Syntax: Finetuning and Comprehensive Evaluation of Language Models for Speech Pathology
• Authors: Fagun Patel, Duc Q. Nguyen, Sang T. Truong, Jody Vaynshtok, Sanmi Koyejo, Nick Haber,
• Abstract summary: More than 3.4 million children experience speech disorders that require clinical intervention.<n>The number of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) is roughly 20 times fewer than the number of affected children.
• Score: 28.33400979049354
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: According to the U.S. National Institutes of Health, more than 3.4 million children experience speech disorders that require clinical intervention. The number of speech-language pathologists (SLPs) is roughly 20 times fewer than the number of affected children, highlighting a significant gap in children's care and a pressing need for technological support that improves the productivity of SLPs. State-of-the-art multimodal language models (MLMs) show promise for supporting SLPs, but their use remains underexplored largely due to a limited understanding of their performance in high-stakes clinical settings. To address this gap, we collaborate with domain experts to develop a taxonomy of real-world use cases of MLMs in speech-language pathologies. Building on this taxonomy, we introduce the first comprehensive benchmark for evaluating MLM across five core use cases, each containing 1,000 manually annotated data points. This benchmark includes robustness and sensitivity tests under various settings, including background noise, speaker gender, and accent. Our evaluation of 15 state-of-the-art MLMs reveals that no single model consistently outperforms others across all tasks. Notably, we find systematic disparities, with models performing better on male speakers, and observe that chain-of-thought prompting can degrade performance on classification tasks with large label spaces and narrow decision boundaries. Furthermore, we study fine-tuning MLMs on domain-specific data, achieving improvements of over 10\% compared to base models. These findings highlight both the potential and limitations of current MLMs for speech-language pathology applications, underscoring the need for further research and targeted development.

Related papers

• RoBiologyDataChoiceQA: A Romanian Dataset for improving Biology understanding of Large Language Models [0.15293427903448023]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated significant potential across various natural language processing (NLP) tasks.<n>This study introduces a novel Romanian-language dataset for multiple-choice biology questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-30T05:41:50Z)
• BRIDGE: Benchmarking Large Language Models for Understanding Real-world Clinical Practice Text [10.071956824618418]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold great promise for medical applications and are evolving rapidly.<n>Most existing benchmarks rely on medical exam-style questions or PubMed-derived text.<n>We present BRIDGE, a comprehensive benchmark comprising 87 tasks sourced from real-world clinical data sources across nine languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T04:13:18Z)
• VisuLogic: A Benchmark for Evaluating Visual Reasoning in Multi-modal Large Language Models [121.03333569013148]
  We introduce VisuLogic: a benchmark of 1,000 human-verified problems across six categories.<n>These types of questions can be evaluated to assess the visual reasoning capabilities of MLLMs from multiple perspectives.<n>Most models score below 30% accuracy-only slightly above the 25% random baseline and far below the 51.4% achieved by humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T17:59:53Z)
• Conversation AI Dialog for Medicare powered by Finetuning and Retrieval Augmented Generation [0.0]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown impressive capabilities in natural language processing tasks, including dialogue generation.<n>This research aims to conduct a novel comparative analysis of two prominent techniques, fine-tuning with LoRA and the Retrieval-Augmented Generation framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-04T11:50:40Z)
• LlaMADRS: Prompting Large Language Models for Interview-Based Depression Assessment [75.44934940580112]
  This study introduces LlaMADRS, a novel framework leveraging open-source Large Language Models (LLMs) to automate depression severity assessment.<n>We employ a zero-shot prompting strategy with carefully designed cues to guide the model in interpreting and scoring transcribed clinical interviews.<n>Our approach, tested on 236 real-world interviews, demonstrates strong correlations with clinician assessments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-07T08:49:04Z)
• Understanding the Role of LLMs in Multimodal Evaluation Benchmarks [77.59035801244278]
  This paper investigates the role of the Large Language Model (LLM) backbone in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) evaluation. Our study encompasses four diverse MLLM benchmarks and eight state-of-the-art MLLMs. Key findings reveal that some benchmarks allow high performance even without visual inputs and up to 50% of error rates can be attributed to insufficient world knowledge in the LLM backbone.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:49:13Z)
• MMIE: Massive Multimodal Interleaved Comprehension Benchmark for Large Vision-Language Models [71.36392373876505]
  We introduce MMIE, a large-scale benchmark for evaluating interleaved multimodal comprehension and generation in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>MMIE comprises 20K meticulously curated multimodal queries, spanning 3 categories, 12 fields, and 102 subfields, including mathematics, coding, physics, literature, health, and arts.<n>It supports both interleaved inputs and outputs, offering a mix of multiple-choice and open-ended question formats to evaluate diverse competencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T04:15:00Z)
• GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals. GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z)
• DrBenchmark: A Large Language Understanding Evaluation Benchmark for French Biomedical Domain [8.246368441549967]
  We present the first-ever publicly available French biomedical language understanding benchmark called DrBenchmark. It encompasses 20 diversified tasks, including named-entity recognition, part-of-speech tagging, question-answering, semantic textual similarity, and classification. We evaluate 8 state-of-the-art pre-trained masked language models (MLMs) on general and biomedical-specific data, as well as English specifics to assess their cross-lingual capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T23:54:02Z)
• PMC-LLaMA: Towards Building Open-source Language Models for Medicine [62.39105735933138]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have showcased remarkable capabilities in natural language understanding. LLMs struggle in domains that require precision, such as medical applications, due to their lack of domain-specific knowledge. We describe the procedure for building a powerful, open-source language model specifically designed for medicine applications, termed as PMC-LLaMA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-27T18:29:05Z)
• Are Large Language Models Ready for Healthcare? A Comparative Study on Clinical Language Understanding [12.128991867050487]
  Large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in various domains, including healthcare. In this study, we evaluate state-of-the-art LLMs within the realm of clinical language understanding tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-09T16:31:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.