A Comprehensive Performance Comparison of Traditional and Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Online Fraud Detection
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17176v1
- Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 17:53:24 GMT
- Title: A Comprehensive Performance Comparison of Traditional and Ensemble Machine Learning Models for Online Fraud Detection
- Authors: Ganesh Khekare, Shivam Sunda, Yash Bothra,
- Abstract summary: Real-time fraud detection is essential for financial security but remains challenging due to high transaction volumes and the complexity of modern fraud patterns.<n>This study presents a comprehensive comparison between traditional machine learning models like Random Forest, SVM, Logistic Regression, and ensemble methods like Stacking and Voting.<n>The ensemble methods achieved an almost perfect precision of around 0.99, but traditional methods demonstrated superior performance in terms of recall.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In the era of the digitally driven economy, where there has been an exponential surge in digital payment systems and other online activities, various forms of fraudulent activities have accompanied the digital growth, out of which credit card fraud has become an increasingly significant threat. To deal with this, real-time fraud detection is essential for financial security but remains challenging due to high transaction volumes and the complexity of modern fraud patterns. This study presents a comprehensive performance comparison between traditional machine learning models like Random Forest, SVM, Logistic Regression, XGBoost, and ensemble methods like Stacking and Voting Classifier for detecting credit card fraud on a heavily imbalanced public dataset, where the number of fraudulent transactions is 492 out of 284,807 total transactions. Application-specific preprocessing techniques were applied, and the models were evaluated using various performance metrics. The ensemble methods achieved an almost perfect precision of around 0.99, but traditional methods demonstrated superior performance in terms of recall, which highlights the trade-off between false positives and false negatives. The comprehensive comparison reveals distinct performance strengths and limitations for each algorithm, offering insights to guide practitioners in selecting the most effective model for robust fraud detection applications in real-world settings.
Related papers
- Adversarial Bias: Data Poisoning Attacks on Fairness [48.17618627431355]
There is relatively little research on how an AI system's fairness can be intentionally compromised.<n>In this work, we provide a theoretical analysis demonstrating that a simple adversarial poisoning strategy is sufficient to induce maximally unfair behavior.<n>Our attack significantly outperforms existing methods in degrading fairness metrics across multiple models and datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-11T15:09:53Z) - Deep Learning Models for Robust Facial Liveness Detection [56.08694048252482]
This study introduces a robust solution through novel deep learning models addressing the deficiencies in contemporary anti-spoofing techniques.<n>By innovatively integrating texture analysis and reflective properties associated with genuine human traits, our models distinguish authentic presence from replicas with remarkable precision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-12T17:19:20Z) - Securing Transactions: A Hybrid Dependable Ensemble Machine Learning
Model using IHT-LR and Grid Search [2.4374097382908477]
We introduce a state-of-the-art hybrid ensemble (ENS) Machine learning (ML) model that intelligently combines multiple algorithms to enhance fraud identification.
Our experiments are conducted on a publicly available credit card dataset comprising 284,807 transactions.
The proposed model achieves impressive accuracy rates of 99.66%, 99.73%, 98.56%, and 99.79%, and a perfect 100% for the DT, RF, KNN, and ENS models, respectively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-22T09:01:42Z) - Towards Evaluating Transfer-based Attacks Systematically, Practically,
and Fairly [79.07074710460012]
adversarial vulnerability of deep neural networks (DNNs) has drawn great attention.
An increasing number of transfer-based methods have been developed to fool black-box DNN models.
We establish a transfer-based attack benchmark (TA-Bench) which implements 30+ methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-02T15:35:58Z) - Transaction Fraud Detection via an Adaptive Graph Neural Network [64.9428588496749]
We propose an Adaptive Sampling and Aggregation-based Graph Neural Network (ASA-GNN) that learns discriminative representations to improve the performance of transaction fraud detection.
A neighbor sampling strategy is performed to filter noisy nodes and supplement information for fraudulent nodes.
Experiments on three real financial datasets demonstrate that the proposed method ASA-GNN outperforms state-of-the-art ones.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T07:48:39Z) - Blockchain Large Language Models [65.7726590159576]
This paper presents a dynamic, real-time approach to detecting anomalous blockchain transactions.
The proposed tool, BlockGPT, generates tracing representations of blockchain activity and trains from scratch a large language model to act as a real-time Intrusion Detection System.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-25T11:56:18Z) - Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Enhanced Random Forest Classifier for
Imbalanced Data [0.8223798883838329]
This paper implements the random forest (RF) algorithm to solve the issue in the hand.
A dataset of credit card transactions was used in this study.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-11T22:59:37Z) - Empirical study of Machine Learning Classifier Evaluation Metrics
behavior in Massively Imbalanced and Noisy data [0.0]
We develop a theoretical foundation to model human annotation errors and extreme imbalance typical in real world fraud detection data sets.
We demonstrate that a combined F1 score and g-mean, in that specific order, is the best evaluation metric for typical imbalanced fraud detection model classification.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-08-25T07:30:31Z) - Evaluating resampling methods on a real-life highly imbalanced online
credit card payments dataset [0.0]
This paper evaluates numerous state-of-the-art resampling methods on a large real-life online credit card payments dataset.
We show they are inefficient because methods are intractable or because metrics do not exhibit substantial improvements.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-27T09:57:08Z) - Distributed Dynamic Safe Screening Algorithms for Sparse Regularization [73.85961005970222]
We propose a new distributed dynamic safe screening (DDSS) method for sparsity regularized models and apply it on shared-memory and distributed-memory architecture respectively.
We prove that the proposed method achieves the linear convergence rate with lower overall complexity and can eliminate almost all the inactive features in a finite number of iterations almost surely.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-04-23T02:45:55Z) - Application of Deep Reinforcement Learning to Payment Fraud [0.0]
A typical fraud detection system employs standard supervised learning methods where the focus is on maximizing the fraud recall rate.
We argue that such a formulation can lead to suboptimal solutions.
We formulate fraud detection as a sequential decision-making problem by including the utility within the model in the form of the reward function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-08T11:30:53Z) - Relational Graph Neural Networks for Fraud Detection in a Super-App
environment [53.561797148529664]
We propose a framework of relational graph convolutional networks methods for fraudulent behaviour prevention in the financial services of a Super-App.
We use an interpretability algorithm for graph neural networks to determine the most important relations to the classification task of the users.
Our results show that there is an added value when considering models that take advantage of the alternative data of the Super-App and the interactions found in their high connectivity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-29T00:02:06Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.