Mind the Gap: Comparing Model- vs Agentic-Level Red Teaming with Action-Graph Observability on GPT-OSS-20B

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17259v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 22:18:34 GMT
• Title: Mind the Gap: Comparing Model- vs Agentic-Level Red Teaming with Action-Graph Observability on GPT-OSS-20B
• Authors: Ilham Wicaksono, Zekun Wu, Rahul Patel, Theo King, Adriano Koshiyama, Philip Treleaven,
• Abstract summary: This paper conducts a comparative red teaming analysis of GPT-OSS-20B, a 20-billion parameter open-source model.<n>Our evaluation reveals fundamental differences between model level and agentic level vulnerability profiles.<n>Agentic level iterative attacks successfully compromise objectives that completely failed at the model level.
• Score: 1.036334370262262
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: As the industry increasingly adopts agentic AI systems, understanding their unique vulnerabilities becomes critical. Prior research suggests that security flaws at the model level do not fully capture the risks present in agentic deployments, where models interact with tools and external environments. This paper investigates this gap by conducting a comparative red teaming analysis of GPT-OSS-20B, a 20-billion parameter open-source model. Using our observability framework AgentSeer to deconstruct agentic systems into granular actions and components, we apply iterative red teaming attacks with harmful objectives from HarmBench at two distinct levels: the standalone model and the model operating within an agentic loop. Our evaluation reveals fundamental differences between model level and agentic level vulnerability profiles. Critically, we discover the existence of agentic-only vulnerabilities, attack vectors that emerge exclusively within agentic execution contexts while remaining inert against standalone models. Agentic level iterative attacks successfully compromise objectives that completely failed at the model level, with tool-calling contexts showing 24\% higher vulnerability than non-tool contexts. Conversely, certain model-specific exploits work exclusively at the model level and fail when transferred to agentic contexts, demonstrating that standalone model vulnerabilities do not always generalize to deployed systems.

Related papers

• CIBER: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Security Evaluation of Code Interpreter Agents [27.35968236632966]
  LLM-based code interpreter agents are increasingly deployed in critical situations.<n>Existing benchmarks fail to capture the security risks arising from dynamic code execution, tool interactions, and multi-turn context.<n>We introduce CIBER, an automated benchmark that combines dynamic attack generation, isolated secure sandboxing, and state-aware evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T06:41:41Z)
• OMNI-LEAK: Orchestrator Multi-Agent Network Induced Data Leakage [59.3826294523924]
  We investigate the security vulnerabilities of a popular multi-agent pattern known as the orchestrator setup.<n>We report the susceptibility of frontier models to different categories of attacks, finding that both reasoning and non-reasoning models are vulnerable.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-13T21:32:32Z)
• Just Ask: Curious Code Agents Reveal System Prompts in Frontier LLMs [65.6660735371212]
  We present textbftextscJustAsk, a framework that autonomously discovers effective extraction strategies through interaction alone.<n>It formulates extraction as an online exploration problem, using Upper Confidence Bound--based strategy selection and a hierarchical skill space spanning atomic probes and high-level orchestration.<n>Our results expose system prompts as a critical yet largely unprotected attack surface in modern agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T03:53:25Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• BackdoorAgent: A Unified Framework for Backdoor Attacks on LLM-based Agents [58.83028403414688]
  Large language model (LLM) agents execute tasks through multi-step workflow that combine planning, memory, and tool use.<n>Backdoor triggers injected into specific stages of an agent workflow can persist through multiple intermediate states and adversely influence downstream outputs.<n>We propose textbfBackdoorAgent, a modular and stage-aware framework that provides a unified agent-centric view of backdoor threats in LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T03:49:39Z)
• DREAM: Dynamic Red-teaming across Environments for AI Models [28.267208528754082]
  We introduce DREAM, a framework for evaluation of Large Language Models (LLMs) against dynamic, multi-stage attacks.<n>At its core, DREAM uses a Cross-Environment Adrial Knowledge Graph (CE-AKG) to maintain stateful, cross-domain understanding of vulnerabilities.<n>Our evaluation of 12 leading LLM agents reveals a critical vulnerability: these attack chains succeed in over 70% of cases for most models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-22T04:11:57Z)
• AgentCompass: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Agentic Workflows in Production [4.031479494871582]
  We present Agent, the first evaluation framework designed specifically for post-deployment monitoring and reasoning of agentic pipeline.<n>Agent achieves state-of-the-art results on key metrics, while uncovering critical issues missed in human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-18T05:59:04Z)
• Mind the Gap: Evaluating Model- and Agentic-Level Vulnerabilities in LLMs with Action Graphs [0.6087817758152709]
  We introduce AgentSeer, an observability-based evaluation framework that decomposes agentic executions into granular action and component graphs.<n>We demonstrate fundamental differences between model-level and agentic-level vulnerability profiles.<n>Agentic-level assessment exposes agent-specific risks invisible to traditional evaluation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-05T04:36:17Z)
• Towards Unifying Quantitative Security Benchmarking for Multi Agent Systems [0.0]
  Evolving AI systems increasingly deploy multi-agent architectures where autonomous agents collaborate, share information, and delegate tasks through developing protocols.<n>One such risk is a cascading risk: a breach in one agent can cascade through the system, compromising others by exploiting inter-agent trust.<n>In an ACI attack, a malicious input or tool exploit injected at one agent leads to cascading compromises and amplified downstream effects across agents that trust its outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T13:51:28Z)
• AgentVigil: Generic Black-Box Red-teaming for Indirect Prompt Injection against LLM Agents [54.29555239363013]
  We propose a generic black-box fuzzing framework, AgentVigil, to automatically discover and exploit indirect prompt injection vulnerabilities.<n>We evaluate AgentVigil on two public benchmarks, AgentDojo and VWA-adv, where it achieves 71% and 70% success rates against agents based on o3-mini and GPT-4o.<n>We apply our attacks in real-world environments, successfully misleading agents to navigate to arbitrary URLs, including malicious sites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T07:40:17Z)
• In-Context Experience Replay Facilitates Safety Red-Teaming of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [104.94706600050557]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models have shown remarkable progress, but their potential to generate harmful content remains a critical concern in the ML community.<n>We propose ICER, a novel red-teaming framework that generates interpretable and semantic meaningful problematic prompts.<n>Our work provides crucial insights for developing more robust safety mechanisms in T2I systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T04:17:24Z)
• Dissecting Adversarial Robustness of Multimodal LM Agents [70.2077308846307]
  We manually create 200 targeted adversarial tasks and evaluation scripts in a realistic threat model on top of VisualWebArena.<n>We find that we can successfully break latest agents that use black-box frontier LMs, including those that perform reflection and tree search.<n>We also use ARE to rigorously evaluate how the robustness changes as new components are added.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T17:32:48Z)
• Towards Scalable and Robust Model Versioning [30.249607205048125]
  Malicious incursions aimed at gaining access to deep learning models are on the rise. We show how to generate multiple versions of a model that possess different attack properties. We show theoretically that this can be accomplished by incorporating parameterized hidden distributions into the model training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-17T19:55:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.