AgentCompass: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Agentic Workflows in Production

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.14647v1
• Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2025 05:59:04 GMT
• Title: AgentCompass: Towards Reliable Evaluation of Agentic Workflows in Production
• Abstract summary: We present Agent, the first evaluation framework designed specifically for post-deployment monitoring and reasoning of agentic pipeline.<n>Agent achieves state-of-the-art results on key metrics, while uncovering critical issues missed in human annotations.
• Score: 4.031479494871582
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the growing adoption of Large Language Models (LLMs) in automating complex, multi-agent workflows, organizations face mounting risks from errors, emergent behaviors, and systemic failures that current evaluation methods fail to capture. We present AgentCompass, the first evaluation framework designed specifically for post-deployment monitoring and debugging of agentic workflows. AgentCompass models the reasoning process of expert debuggers through a structured, multi-stage analytical pipeline: error identification and categorization, thematic clustering, quantitative scoring, and strategic summarization. The framework is further enhanced with a dual memory system-episodic and semantic-that enables continual learning across executions. Through collaborations with design partners, we demonstrate the framework's practical utility on real-world deployments, before establishing its efficacy against the publicly available TRAIL benchmark. AgentCompass achieves state-of-the-art results on key metrics, while uncovering critical issues missed in human annotations, underscoring its role as a robust, developer-centric tool for reliable monitoring and improvement of agentic systems in production.

Related papers

• From Question Answering to Task Completion: A Survey on Agent System and Harness Design [67.8241530947325]
  This survey examines LLM-based agents through a model-harness lens.<n>We first clarify the functional definition of agents and the implementation view of an LLM-based agent as a foundation model and an execution harness.<n>We then analyze the limits of model-centric scaling, trace four paradigms of agent engineering, and decompose the execution harness into six coupled runtime responsibilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-14T05:40:16Z)
• The Meta-Agent Challenge: Are Current Agents Capable of Autonomous Agent Development? [80.24951682268332]
  We introduce the Meta-Agent Challenge (MAC), an evaluation framework designed to test the capacity of frontier models for autonomous agent development.<n>To ensure evaluation integrity, this framework is secured by multi-layer defenses against reward hacking.<n>We demonstrate that meta-agents rarely match human-engineered baseline policies, and the few that do are dominated by proprietary frontier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-03T04:58:17Z)
• Meta-Agent: From Task Descriptions to Verified Multi-Agent Systems [36.485119937780524]
  We present Meta-Agent, a two-phase framework that automatically constructs and executes specialized multi-agent systems.<n>We introduce a three-level error attribution mechanism that distinguishes local, upstream, and structural failures.<n>Experiments against strong multi-agent baselines and ablation studies demonstrate consistent improvements in task success rate, error recovery, and workflow stability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-24T19:38:54Z)
• Towards a Virtual Neuroscientist: Autonomous Neuroimaging Analysis via Multi-Agent Collaboration [53.772014300855375]
  We introduce NIAgent, a multi-agent system for autonomous end-to-end neuroimaging analysis.<n>Unlike conventional flat tool-calling agents, NIAgent adopts a code-centric execution paradigm.<n>We propose a hierarchical verification framework for autonomous quality control, integrating cohort-level metric screening with agentic visual inspection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-10T06:30:19Z)
• A Case-Driven Multi-Agent Framework for E-Commerce Search Relevance [0.0]
  Relevance is a foundation of user experience in e-commerce search.<n>We propose a case-driven multi-agent framework that automates the pipeline from bad-case identification to resolution.<n>We show that the framework performs relevance-related tasks effectively, improves annotation accuracy, and enables more timely and generalizable bad-case resolution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-07T10:41:50Z)
• Beyond the 'Diff': Addressing Agentic Entropy in Agentic Software Development [42.371764229953165]
  We propose a process-oriented explainability framework that exposes how agentic decisions unfold across time, tool calls, and architectural boundaries.<n>Our approach provides intent-level telemetry that complements, rather than replaces, existing review practices.<n>By treating cognitive drift as a first-class concern alongside code quality, our framework supports the minimum level of human comprehension required for agentic oversight to remain substantive.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-03T12:55:28Z)
• VeRO: An Evaluation Harness for Agents to Optimize Agents [5.227525836910522]
  We introduce VERO (Versioning, Rewards, and Observations), which provides a reproducible evaluation harness with versioned agent snapshots, budget-controlled evaluation, and structured execution traces.<n>We conduct an empirical study comparing target agents and analyzing which modifications reliably improve target agent performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-25T23:40:22Z)
• Case-Aware LLM-as-a-Judge Evaluation for Enterprise-Scale RAG Systems [0.0]
  We present a case-aware LLM-as-a-Judge evaluation framework for enterprise multi-turn RAG systems.<n>The framework evaluates each turn using eight operationally grounded metrics that separate retrieval quality, grounding fidelity, answer utility, precision integrity, and case/workflow alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-23T21:37:06Z)
• Co-RedTeam: Orchestrated Security Discovery and Exploitation with LLM Agents [57.49020237126194]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise in assisting cybersecurity tasks, yet existing approaches struggle with automatic vulnerability discovery and exploitation.<n>We propose Co-RedTeam, a security-aware multi-agent framework designed to mirror real-world red-teaming.<n>Co-RedTeam decomposes vulnerability analysis into coordinated discovery and exploitation stages, enabling agents to plan, execute, validate, and refine actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-02T14:38:45Z)
• The Why Behind the Action: Unveiling Internal Drivers via Agentic Attribution [63.61358761489141]
  Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents are widely used in real-world applications such as customer service, web navigation, and software engineering.<n>We propose a novel framework for textbfgeneral agentic attribution, designed to identify the internal factors driving agent actions regardless of the task outcome.<n>We validate our framework across a diverse suite of agentic scenarios, including standard tool use and subtle reliability risks like memory-induced bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-21T15:22:21Z)
• The Bitter Lesson of Diffusion Language Models for Agentic Workflows: A Comprehensive Reality Check [54.08619694620588]
  We present a comprehensive evaluation of dLLMs across two distinct agentic paradigms: Embodied Agents and Tool-Calling Agents.<n>Our results on Agentboard and BFCL reveal a "bitter lesson": current dLLMs fail to serve as reliable agentic backbones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T11:45:39Z)
• Beyond Task Completion: An Assessment Framework for Evaluating Agentic AI Systems [0.0]
  Recent advances in agentic AI have shifted the focus from standalone Large Language Models to integrated systems.<n>We propose an end-to-end Agent Assessment Framework with four evaluation pillars encompassing LLMs, Memory, Tools, and Environment.<n>We validate the framework on a representative Autonomous CloudOps use case, where experiments reveal behavioral deviations by conventional metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-14T18:17:40Z)
• LoCoBench-Agent: An Interactive Benchmark for LLM Agents in Long-Context Software Engineering [90.84806758077536]
  We introduce textbfLoCoBench-Agent, a comprehensive evaluation framework specifically designed to assess large language models (LLMs) agents in realistic, long-context software engineering.<n>Our framework extends LoCoBench's 8,000 scenarios into interactive agent environments, enabling systematic evaluation of multi-turn conversations.<n>Our framework provides agents with 8 specialized tools (file operations, search, code analysis) and evaluates them across context lengths ranging from 10K to 1M tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-17T23:57:24Z)
• Metacognitive Self-Correction for Multi-Agent System via Prototype-Guided Next-Execution Reconstruction [58.51530390018909]
  Large Language Model based multi-agent systems excel at collaborative problem solving but remain brittle to cascading errors.<n>We present MASC, a metacognitive framework that endows MAS with real-time, unsupervised, step-level error detection and self-correction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-16T05:35:37Z)
• Helpful Agent Meets Deceptive Judge: Understanding Vulnerabilities in Agentic Workflows [41.97051158610974]
  We present a systematic analysis of agentic robustness under deceptive or misleading feedback.<n>We reveal that even strongest agents are vulnerable to persuasive yet flawed critiques.<n>Our findings highlight fundamental vulnerabilities in feedback-based robustness and offer guidance for building more robust agentic systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T19:26:23Z)
• Agentic Predictor: Performance Prediction for Agentic Workflows via Multi-View Encoding [56.565200973244146]
  Agentic Predictor is a lightweight predictor for efficient agentic workflow evaluation.<n>By learning to approximate task success rates, Agentic Predictor enables fast and accurate selection of optimal agentic workflow configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T09:46:50Z)
• TRAIL: Trace Reasoning and Agentic Issue Localization [5.025960714013197]
  This work articulates the need for robust and dynamic evaluation methods for agentic workflow traces.<n>We present a set of 148 large human-annotated traces (TRAIL) constructed using this taxonomy and grounded in established agentic benchmarks.<n>To ensure ecological validity, we curate traces from both single and multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-13T14:55:31Z)
• MAMM-Refine: A Recipe for Improving Faithfulness in Generation with Multi-Agent Collaboration [63.31211701741323]
  We extend multi-agent multi-model reasoning to generation, specifically to improving faithfulness through refinement.<n>We design intrinsic evaluations for each subtask, with our findings indicating that both multi-agent (multiple instances) and multi-model (diverse LLM types) approaches benefit error detection and critiquing.<n>We consolidate these insights into a final "recipe" called Multi-Agent Multi-Model Refinement (MAMM-Refine), where multi-agent and multi-model collaboration significantly boosts performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-19T14:46:53Z)
• SOPBench: Evaluating Language Agents at Following Standard Operating Procedures and Constraints [59.645885492637845]
  SOPBench is an evaluation pipeline that transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions.<n>Our approach transforms each service-specific SOP code program into a directed graph of executable functions and requires agents to call these functions based on natural language SOP descriptions.<n>We evaluate 18 leading models, and results show the task is challenging even for top-tier models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-11T17:53:02Z)
• Investigating the Role of Instruction Variety and Task Difficulty in Robotic Manipulation Tasks [50.75902473813379]
  This work introduces a comprehensive evaluation framework that systematically examines the role of instructions and inputs in the generalisation abilities of such models. The proposed framework uncovers the resilience of multimodal models to extreme instruction perturbations and their vulnerability to observational changes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-04T14:36:49Z)
• AgentBoard: An Analytical Evaluation Board of Multi-turn LLM Agents [74.16170899755281]
  We introduce AgentBoard, a pioneering comprehensive benchmark and accompanied open-source evaluation framework tailored to analytical evaluation of LLM agents.<n>AgentBoard offers a fine-grained progress rate metric that captures incremental advancements as well as a comprehensive evaluation toolkit.<n>This not only sheds light on the capabilities and limitations of LLM agents but also propels the interpretability of their performance to the forefront.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T01:51:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.