Identifying and Upweighting Power-Niche Users to Mitigate Popularity Bias in Recommendations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17265v1
• Date: Sun, 21 Sep 2025 22:41:07 GMT
• Title: Identifying and Upweighting Power-Niche Users to Mitigate Popularity Bias in Recommendations
• Authors: David Liu, Erik Weis, Moritz Laber, Tina Eliassi-Rad, Brennan Klein,
• Abstract summary: We study interactions with niche items in benchmark recommendation datasets.<n>We find that, compared to mainstream users, niche-preferring users exhibit a longer-tailed activity-level distribution.<n>We propose a framework for reweighting the Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) loss that simultaneously reweights based on user activity level and item popularity.
• Score: 1.4513864254603666
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Recommender systems have been shown to exhibit popularity bias by over-recommending popular items and under-recommending relevant niche items. We seek to understand interactions with niche items in benchmark recommendation datasets as a step toward mitigating popularity bias. We find that, compared to mainstream users, niche-preferring users exhibit a longer-tailed activity-level distribution, indicating the existence of users who both prefer niche items and exhibit high activity levels. We partition users along two axes: (1) activity level ("power" vs. "light") and (2) item-popularity preference ("mainstream" vs. "niche"), and show that in several benchmark datasets, the number of power-niche users (high activity and niche preference) is statistically significantly larger than expected under a null configuration model. Motivated by this observation, we propose a framework for reweighting the Bayesian Personalized Ranking (BPR) loss that simultaneously reweights based on user activity level and item popularity. Our method introduces two interpretable parameters: one controlling the significance of user activity level, and the other of item popularity. Experiments on benchmark datasets show that upweighting power-niche users reduces popularity bias and can increase overall performance. In contrast to previous work that only considers user activity level or item popularity in isolation, our results suggest that considering their interaction leads to Pareto-dominant performance.

Related papers

• The Unfairness of Multifactorial Bias in Recommendation [68.35079031029616]
  Popularity bias and positivity bias are prominent sources of bias in recommender systems.<n>In this work, we examine how multifactorial bias influences item-side fairness.<n>We adapt a percentile-based rating transformation as a pre-processing strategy to mitigate multifactorial bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-19T08:37:43Z)
• Tree of Preferences for Diversified Recommendation [54.183647833064136]
  We study diversified recommendation from a data-bias perspective.<n>Inspired by the outstanding performance of large language models (LLMs) in zero-shot inference leveraging world knowledge, we propose a novel approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T04:13:17Z)
• PBiLoss: Popularity-Aware Regularization to Improve Fairness in Graph-Based Recommender Systems [1.0128808054306186]
  We propose PBiLoss, a regularization-based loss function designed to counteract popularity bias in graph-based recommender models explicitly.<n>We show that PBiLoss significantly improves fairness, as demonstrated by reductions in the Popularity-Rank Correlation for Users (PRU) and Popularity-Rank Correlation for Items (PRI)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-25T08:29:32Z)
• Taming Recommendation Bias with Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity [21.645389873171908]
  Popularity bias occurs when popular items are recommended far more frequently than they should be.<n>Existing debiasing methods mitigate popularity bias often uniformly across all users.<n>We propose a novel method called CausalEPP (Causal Intervention on Evolving Personal Popularity) for taming recommendation bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-20T12:59:16Z)
• Multi-agents based User Values Mining for Recommendation [52.26100802380767]
  We propose a zero-shot multi-LLM collaborative framework for effective and accurate user value extraction.<n>We apply text summarization techniques to condense item content while preserving essential meaning.<n>To mitigate hallucinations, we introduce two specialized agent roles: evaluators and supervisors.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T04:01:31Z)
• Enhancing Sequential Music Recommendation with Personalized Popularity Awareness [56.972624411205224]
  This paper introduces a novel approach that incorporates personalized popularity information into sequential recommendation. Experimental results demonstrate that a Personalized Most Popular recommender outperforms existing state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-06T15:05:12Z)
• Going Beyond Popularity and Positivity Bias: Correcting for Multifactorial Bias in Recommender Systems [74.47680026838128]
  Two typical forms of bias in user interaction data with recommender systems (RSs) are popularity bias and positivity bias. We consider multifactorial selection bias affected by both item and rating value factors. We propose smoothing and alternating gradient descent techniques to reduce variance and improve the robustness of its optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T12:18:21Z)
• Personalizing Intervened Network for Long-tailed Sequential User Behavior Modeling [66.02953670238647]
  Tail users suffer from significantly lower-quality recommendation than the head users after joint training. A model trained on tail users separately still achieve inferior results due to limited data. We propose a novel approach that significantly improves the recommendation performance of the tail users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-19T02:50:19Z)
• The Unfairness of Popularity Bias in Book Recommendation [0.0]
  Popularity bias refers to the problem that popular items are recommended frequently while less popular items are recommended rarely or not at all. We analyze the well-known Book-Crossing dataset and define three user groups based on their tendency towards popular items. Our results indicate that most state-of-the-art recommendation algorithms suffer from popularity bias in the book domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-27T20:21:46Z)
• Revisiting Popularity and Demographic Biases in Recommender Evaluation and Effectiveness [6.210698627561645]
  We investigate how recommender performance varies according to popularity and demographics. We find statistically significant differences in recommender performance by both age and gender. We observe that recommendation utility steadily degrades for older users, and is lower for women than men.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T20:30:51Z)
• On component interactions in two-stage recommender systems [82.38014314502861]
  Two-stage recommenders are used by many online platforms, including YouTube, LinkedIn, and Pinterest. We show that interactions between the ranker and the nominators substantially affect the overall performance. In particular, using a Mixture-of-Experts approach, we train the nominators to specialize on different subsets of the item pool.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-28T20:53:23Z)
• Set2setRank: Collaborative Set to Set Ranking for Implicit Feedback based Recommendation [59.183016033308014]
  In this paper, we explore the unique characteristics of the implicit feedback and propose Set2setRank framework for recommendation. Our proposed framework is model-agnostic and can be easily applied to most recommendation prediction approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-16T08:06:22Z)
• User-centered Evaluation of Popularity Bias in Recommender Systems [4.30484058393522]
  Recommendation and ranking systems suffer from popularity bias; the tendency of the algorithm to favor a few popular items while under-representing the majority of other items. In this paper, we show the limitations of the existing metrics to evaluate popularity bias mitigation when we want to assess these algorithms from the users' perspective. We present an effective approach that mitigates popularity bias from the user-centered point of view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-10T22:12:51Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.