Is It Certainly a Deepfake? Reliability Analysis in Detection & Generation Ecosystem

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.17550v3
• Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2025 09:32:18 GMT
• Title: Is It Certainly a Deepfake? Reliability Analysis in Detection & Generation Ecosystem
• Abstract summary: We present the first comprehensive uncertainty analysis of deepfake detectors.<n>We investigate how generative artifacts influence prediction confidence.<n>Based on our observations, the uncertainty manifold holds enough consistent information to leverage uncertainty for deepfake source detection.
• Score: 3.997629738288533
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: As generative models are advancing in quality and quantity for creating synthetic content, deepfakes begin to cause online mistrust. Deepfake detectors are proposed to counter this effect, however, misuse of detectors claiming fake content as real or vice versa further fuels this misinformation problem. We present the first comprehensive uncertainty analysis of deepfake detectors, systematically investigating how generative artifacts influence prediction confidence. As reflected in detectors' responses, deepfake generators also contribute to this uncertainty as their generative residues vary, so we cross the uncertainty analysis of deepfake detectors and generators. Based on our observations, the uncertainty manifold holds enough consistent information to leverage uncertainty for deepfake source detection. Our approach leverages Bayesian Neural Networks and Monte Carlo dropout to quantify both aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties across diverse detector architectures. We evaluate uncertainty on two datasets with nine generators, with four blind and two biological detectors, compare different uncertainty methods, explore region- and pixel-based uncertainty, and conduct ablation studies. We conduct and analyze binary real/fake, multi-class real/fake, source detection, and leave-one-out experiments between the generator/detector combinations to share their generalization capability, model calibration, uncertainty, and robustness against adversarial attacks. We further introduce uncertainty maps that localize prediction confidence at the pixel level, revealing distinct patterns correlated with generator-specific artifacts. Our analysis provides critical insights for deploying reliable deepfake detection systems and establishes uncertainty quantification as a fundamental requirement for trustworthy synthetic media detection.

Related papers

• Conformal Changepoint Localization and Root Cause Analysis with Corrupted Observations [55.76952683833966]
  This paper proposes weighted CONCH (W-CONCH) and weighted CROC (W-CROC) to reduce confidence set size when data may be corrupted.<n>Experiments on image-based and real-world changepoint and root-cause benchmarks show that uncertainty-based weighting substantially reduces confidence set size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-07-29T05:16:59Z)
• Conditional Uncertainty-Aware Political Deepfake Detection with Stochastic Convolutional Neural Networks [0.0]
  generative image models have enabled the creation of highly realistic political deepfakes, posing risks to information integrity, public trust, and democratic processes.<n>While automated deepfake detectors are increasingly deployed in moderation and investigative pipelines, most existing systems provide only point predictions and fail to indicate when outputs are unreliable.<n>This work investigates conditional, uncertainty-aware political deepfake detection using convolutional neural networks within an empirical, decision-oriented reliability framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-10T22:31:18Z)
• Rethinking Cross-Generator Image Forgery Detection through DINOv3 [62.80415066351157]
  Cross-generator detection has emerged as a new challenge forgenerative models.<n>We show that frozen visual foundation models, especially DINOv3, already exhibit strong cross-generator detection capability.<n>We introduce a training-free token-ranking strategy followed by a lightweight linear probe to select a small subset of authenticity-relevant tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-27T14:01:50Z)
• Towards Adversarial Robustness and Uncertainty Quantification in DINOv2-based Few-Shot Anomaly Detection [6.288045889067255]
  Foundation models such as DINOv2 have shown strong performance in few-shot anomaly detection.<n>We present one of the first systematic studies of adversarial attacks and uncertainty estimation in this setting.<n>We find that raw anomaly scores are poorly calibrated, revealing a gap between confidence and correctness that limits safety-critical use.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T15:06:45Z)
• Reliable Smoke Detection via Optical Flow-Guided Feature Fusion and Transformer-Based Uncertainty Modeling [6.270500509647152]
  Smoke plumes exhibit complex dynamics influenced by illumination variability, flow kinematics, and environmental noise.<n>We propose an information-fusion framework by integrating smoke feature representations extracted from monocular imagery.<n>A Two-Phase Uncertainty-Aware Shifted Windows Transformer is proposed for robust and reliable smoke detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-20T10:28:53Z)
• Deep Learning Models for Robust Facial Liveness Detection [56.08694048252482]
  This study introduces a robust solution through novel deep learning models addressing the deficiencies in contemporary anti-spoofing techniques.<n>By innovatively integrating texture analysis and reflective properties associated with genuine human traits, our models distinguish authentic presence from replicas with remarkable precision.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T17:19:20Z)
• Unmasking Synthetic Realities in Generative AI: A Comprehensive Review of Adversarially Robust Deepfake Detection Systems [4.359154048799454]
  Deepfake proliferation-synthetic media poses challenges to digital security, misinformation mitigation, and identity preservation.<n>This systematic review evaluates state-of-the-art deepfake detection methodologies, emphasizing reproducible implementations for transparency and validation.<n>We delineate two core paradigms: (1) detection of fully synthetic media leveraging statistical anomalies and hierarchical feature extraction, and (2) localization of manipulated regions within authentic content employing multi-modal cues such as visual artifacts and temporal inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-24T22:05:52Z)
• Rethinking Individual Fairness in Deepfake Detection [7.926090411049054]
  Generative AI models have substantially improved the realism of synthetic media, yet their misuse through sophisticated DeepFakes poses significant risks.<n>Despite recent advances in deepfake detection, fairness remains inadequately addressed, enabling deepfake markers to exploit biases against specific populations.<n>We propose the first generalizable framework that can be integrated into existing deepfake detectors to enhance individual fairness and generalization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-18T19:04:47Z)
• Probabilistic Modeling of Disparity Uncertainty for Robust and Efficient Stereo Matching [61.73532883992135]
  We propose a new uncertainty-aware stereo matching framework.<n>We adopt Bayes risk as the measurement of uncertainty and use it to separately estimate data and model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-24T23:28:20Z)
• Deepfake Media Generation and Detection in the Generative AI Era: A Survey and Outlook [101.30779332427217]
  We survey deepfake generation and detection techniques, including the most recent developments in the field.<n>We identify various kinds of deepfakes, according to the procedure used to alter or generate the fake content.<n>We develop a novel multimodal benchmark to evaluate deepfake detectors on out-of-distribution content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-29T08:29:25Z)
• Spatial-Frequency Discriminability for Revealing Adversarial Perturbations [53.279716307171604]
  Vulnerability of deep neural networks to adversarial perturbations has been widely perceived in the computer vision community. Current algorithms typically detect adversarial patterns through discriminative decomposition for natural and adversarial data. We propose a discriminative detector relying on a spatial-frequency Krawtchouk decomposition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-18T10:18:59Z)
• Uncertainty-Aware AB3DMOT by Variational 3D Object Detection [74.8441634948334]
  Uncertainty estimation is an effective tool to provide statistically accurate predictions. In this paper, we propose a Variational Neural Network-based TANet 3D object detector to generate 3D object detections with uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-12T14:30:03Z)
• A Review of Uncertainty Calibration in Pretrained Object Detectors [5.440028715314566]
  We investigate the uncertainty calibration properties of different pretrained object detection architectures in a multi-class setting. We propose a framework to ensure a fair, unbiased, and repeatable evaluation. We deliver novel insights into why poor detector calibration emerges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-06T14:06:36Z)
• CertainNet: Sampling-free Uncertainty Estimation for Object Detection [65.28989536741658]
  Estimating the uncertainty of a neural network plays a fundamental role in safety-critical settings. In this work, we propose a novel sampling-free uncertainty estimation method for object detection. We call it CertainNet, and it is the first to provide separate uncertainties for each output signal: objectness, class, location and size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-04T17:59:31Z)
• Gradient-Based Quantification of Epistemic Uncertainty for Deep Object Detectors [8.029049649310213]
  We introduce novel gradient-based uncertainty metrics and investigate them for different object detection architectures. Experiments show significant improvements in true positive / false positive discrimination and prediction of intersection over union. We also find improvement over Monte-Carlo dropout uncertainty metrics and further significant boosts by aggregating different sources of uncertainty metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-09T16:04:11Z)
• No Need to Know Physics: Resilience of Process-based Model-free Anomaly Detection for Industrial Control Systems [95.54151664013011]
  We present a novel framework to generate adversarial spoofing signals that violate physical properties of the system. We analyze four anomaly detectors published at top security conferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T11:02:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.