Think Smart, Not Hard: Difficulty Adaptive Reasoning for Large Audio Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.21960v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 06:49:14 GMT
• Title: Think Smart, Not Hard: Difficulty Adaptive Reasoning for Large Audio Language Models
• Authors: Zhichao Sheng, Shilin Zhou, Chen Gong, Zhenghua Li,
• Abstract summary: Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities.<n>We propose a difficulty-adaptive reasoning method for LALMs.
• Score: 28.578488403845146
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Audio Language Models (LALMs), powered by the chain-of-thought (CoT) paradigm, have shown remarkable reasoning capabilities. Intuitively, different problems often require varying depths of reasoning. While some methods can determine whether to reason for a given problem, they typically lack a fine-grained mechanism to modulate how much to reason. This often results in a ``one-size-fits-all'' reasoning depth, which generates redundant overthinking for simple questions while failing to allocate sufficient thought to complex ones. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth analysis of LALMs and find that an effective and efficient LALM should reason smartly by adapting its reasoning depth to the problem's complexity. To achieve this, we propose a difficulty-adaptive reasoning method for LALMs. Specifically, we propose a reward function that dynamically links reasoning length to the model's perceived problem difficulty. This reward encourages shorter, concise reasoning for easy tasks and more elaborate, in-depth reasoning for complex ones. Extensive experiments demonstrate that our method is both effective and efficient, simultaneously improving task performance and significantly reducing the average reasoning length. Further analysis on reasoning structure paradigm offers valuable insights for future work.

Related papers

• Explore Briefly, Then Decide: Mitigating LLM Overthinking via Cumulative Entropy Regulation [82.62935304152239]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable reasoning abilities on complex problems using long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning.<n>They often suffer from overthinking, meaning generating unnecessarily lengthy reasoning steps for simpler problems.<n>We introduce a novel metric Token Entropy Cumulative Average (TECA), which measures the extent of exploration throughout the reasoning process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-02T17:36:50Z)
• Frontier LLMs Still Struggle with Simple Reasoning Tasks [53.497499123166804]
  This work studies the performance of frontier language models on a broad set of "easy" reasoning problems.<n>We create a suite of procedurally generated simple reasoning tasks, including counting, first-order logic, proof trees, and travel planning.<n>We show that even state-of-the-art thinking models consistently fail on such problems and for similar reasons.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T22:22:49Z)
• Thinkless: LLM Learns When to Think [57.857534644932194]
  Reasoning Language Models, capable of extended chain-of-thought reasoning, have demonstrated remarkable performance on tasks requiring complex logical inference.<n>We propose Thinkless, a learnable framework that empowers an LLM to adaptively select between short-form and long-form reasoning.<n>On several benchmarks such as Minerva Algebra, MATH-500, and GSM8K, Thinkless is able to reduce the usage of long-chain thinking by 50% - 90%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T17:24:16Z)
• Between Underthinking and Overthinking: An Empirical Study of Reasoning Length and correctness in LLMs [52.405085773954596]
  We find that large language models (LLMs) tend to overthink simple problems, generating unnecessarily long outputs, and underthink harder ones.<n>This indicates that models might misjudge problem difficulty and fail to calibrate their response length appropriately.<n> Experiments show that the generation length can be significantly reduced while maintaining acceptable accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-30T18:48:06Z)
• Think When You Need: Self-Adaptive Chain-of-Thought Learning [20.22448368125018]
  Chain of Thought (CoT) reasoning enhances language models' performance but often leads to inefficient "overthinking" on simple problems.<n>We identify that existing approaches directly penalizing reasoning length fail to account for varying problem complexity.<n>Our approach constructs rewards through length and quality comparisons, guided by theoretical assumptions that jointly enhance solution correctness with conciseness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-04T07:34:01Z)
• FReM: A Flexible Reasoning Mechanism for Balancing Quick and Slow Thinking in Long-Context Question Answering [18.213334065233465]
  We propose FReM: Flexible Reasoning Mechanism, a method that adjusts reasoning depth according to the complexity of each question.<n>Specifically, FReM leverages synthetic reference QA examples to provide an explicit chain of thought, enabling efficient handling of simple queries.<n>Experiments on seven QA datasets show that FReM improves reasoning accuracy and scalability, particularly for complex multihop questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T06:20:12Z)
• On Memorization of Large Language Models in Logical Reasoning [70.94164038947078]
  Large language models (LLMs) achieve good performance on challenging reasoning benchmarks, yet could also make basic reasoning mistakes.<n>One hypothesis is that the increasingly high and nearly saturated performance could be due to the memorization of similar problems.<n>We show that fine-tuning leads to heavy memorization, but it also consistently improves generalization performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T15:31:54Z)
• Make LLMs better zero-shot reasoners: Structure-orientated autonomous reasoning [52.83539473110143]
  We introduce a novel structure-oriented analysis method to help Large Language Models (LLMs) better understand a question. To further improve the reliability in complex question-answering tasks, we propose a multi-agent reasoning system, Structure-oriented Autonomous Reasoning Agents (SARA) Extensive experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed reasoning system. Surprisingly, in some cases, the system even surpasses few-shot methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T05:30:33Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.