Does AI Coaching Prepare us for Workplace Negotiations?

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.22545v1
• Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2025 16:21:24 GMT
• Title: Does AI Coaching Prepare us for Workplace Negotiations?
• Authors: Veda Duddu, Jash Rajesh Parekh, Andy Mao, Hanyi Min, Ziang Xiao, Vedant Das Swain, Koustuv Saha,
• Abstract summary: We compare Trucey, a prototype AI coach, with a traditional negotiation Handbook.<n>The Handbook's comprehensive, reviewable content was crucial for participants' confidence and preparedness.<n>Although participants valued AI's rehearsal capability, its guidance often felt verbose and fragmented.
• Score: 15.57105036031543
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Workplace negotiations are undermined by psychological barriers, which can even derail well-prepared tactics. AI offers personalized and always -- available negotiation coaching, yet its effectiveness for negotiation preparedness remains unclear. We built Trucey, a prototype AI coach grounded in Brett's negotiation model. We conducted a between-subjects experiment (N=267), comparing Trucey, ChatGPT, and a traditional negotiation Handbook, followed by in-depth interviews (N=15). While Trucey showed the strongest reductions in fear relative to both comparison conditions, the Handbook outperformed both AIs in usability and psychological empowerment. Interviews revealed that the Handbook's comprehensive, reviewable content was crucial for participants' confidence and preparedness. In contrast, although participants valued AI's rehearsal capability, its guidance often felt verbose and fragmented -- delivered in bits and pieces that required additional effort -- leaving them uncertain or overwhelmed. These findings challenge assumptions of AI superiority and motivate hybrid designs that integrate structured, theory-driven content with targeted rehearsal, clear boundaries, and adaptive scaffolds to address psychological barriers and support negotiation preparedness.

Related papers

• EQ-Negotiator: Dynamic Emotional Personas Empower Small Language Models for Edge-Deployable Credit Negotiation [66.09161596959771]
  Small language models (SLMs) offer a practical alternative, but suffer from a significant performance gap compared to large language models (LLMs)<n>This paper introduces EQ-Negotiator, a novel framework that bridges this capability gap using emotional personas.<n>We show that a 7B parameter language model with EQ-Negotiator achieves better debt recovery and negotiation efficiency than baseline LLMs more than 10 times its size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-05T11:25:07Z)
• Advancing AI Negotiations: New Theory and Evidence from a Large-Scale Autonomous Negotiations Competition [0.0]
  We conducted an International AI Negotiation Competition in which participants designed and refined prompts for AI negotiation agents.<n>We then facilitated over 180,000 negotiations between these agents across multiple scenarios with diverse characteristics and objectives.<n>Surprisingly, warmth--a traditionally human relationship-building trait--was consistently associated with superior outcomes across all key performance metrics.<n> Dominant agents, meanwhile, were especially effective at claiming value.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T03:25:48Z)
• Interactive Dialogue Agents via Reinforcement Learning on Hindsight Regenerations [58.65755268815283]
  Many real dialogues are interactive, meaning an agent's utterances will influence their conversational partner, elicit information, or change their opinion. We use this fact to rewrite and augment existing suboptimal data, and train via offline reinforcement learning (RL) an agent that outperforms both prompting and learning from unaltered human demonstrations. Our results in a user study with real humans show that our approach greatly outperforms existing state-of-the-art dialogue agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:37:51Z)
• How Performance Pressure Influences AI-Assisted Decision Making [52.997197698288936]
  We show how pressure and explainable AI (XAI) techniques interact with AI advice-taking behavior.<n>Our results show complex interaction effects, with different combinations of pressure and XAI techniques either improving or worsening AI advice taking behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T22:39:52Z)
• Be Selfish, But Wisely: Investigating the Impact of Agent Personality in Mixed-Motive Human-Agent Interactions [24.266490660606497]
  We find that self-play RL fails to learn the value of compromise in a negotiation. We modify the training procedure in two novel ways to design agents with diverse personalities and analyze their performance with human partners. We find that although both techniques show promise, a selfish agent, which maximizes its own performance while also avoiding walkaways, performs superior to other variants by implicitly learning to generate value for both itself and the negotiation partner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-22T20:31:35Z)
• Rehearsal: Simulating Conflict to Teach Conflict Resolution [54.32934135393982]
  Rehearsal is a system that allows users to rehearse conflicts with a believable simulated interlocutor. Users can utilize Rehearsal to practice handling a variety of predefined conflict scenarios. Rehearsal uses IRP to generate utterances grounded in conflict resolution theory.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-21T17:59:20Z)
• Language of Bargaining [60.218128617765046]
  We build a novel dataset for studying how the use of language shapes bilateral bargaining. Our work also reveals linguistic signals that are predictive of negotiation outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-12T13:52:01Z)
• Towards Emotion-Aware Agents For Negotiation Dialogues [2.1454205511807234]
  Negotiation is a complex social interaction that encapsulates emotional encounters in human decision-making. Virtual agents that can negotiate with humans are useful in pedagogy and conversational AI. We analyze the extent to which emotion attributes extracted from the negotiation help in the prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T04:42:36Z)
• Structural Pre-training for Dialogue Comprehension [51.215629336320305]
  We present SPIDER, Structural Pre-traIned DialoguE Reader, to capture dialogue exclusive features. To simulate the dialogue-like features, we propose two training objectives in addition to the original LM objectives. Experimental results on widely used dialogue benchmarks verify the effectiveness of the newly introduced self-supervised tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-23T15:16:54Z)
• CaSiNo: A Corpus of Campsite Negotiation Dialogues for Automatic Negotiation Systems [11.43342650898619]
  We present CaSiNo: a novel corpus of over a thousand negotiation dialogues in English. Our design results in diverse and linguistically rich negotiations while maintaining a tractable, closed-domain environment. We propose and evaluate a multi-task framework to recognize these strategies in a given utterance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-29T16:07:25Z)
• Combining Self-Training and Self-Supervised Learning for Unsupervised Disfluency Detection [80.68446022994492]
  In this work, we explore the unsupervised learning paradigm which can potentially work with unlabeled text corpora. Our model builds upon the recent work on Noisy Student Training, a semi-supervised learning approach that extends the idea of self-training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-29T05:29:26Z)
• Negotiating Team Formation Using Deep Reinforcement Learning [32.066083116314815]
  We propose a framework for training agents to negotiate and form teams using deep reinforcement learning. We evaluate our approach on both non-spatial and spatially extended team-formation negotiation environments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T15:41:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.