Gradient Flow Convergence Guarantee for General Neural Network Architectures

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.23887v1
• Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2025 13:52:13 GMT
• Title: Gradient Flow Convergence Guarantee for General Neural Network Architectures
• Authors: Yash Jakhmola,
• Abstract summary: This article presents a unified proof for linear convergence of continuous gradient descent, also called gradient flow, while training any neural network with piecewise non-zero activations or ReLU, sigmoid activations.<n>Our results are only exact in the infinitesimal step size limit, but we find excellent empirical agreement between the predictions of our result and those of the practical step-size gradient descent method.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: A key challenge in modern deep learning theory is to explain the remarkable success of gradient-based optimization methods when training large-scale, complex deep neural networks. Though linear convergence of such methods has been proved for a handful of specific architectures, a united theory still evades researchers. This article presents a unified proof for linear convergence of continuous gradient descent, also called gradient flow, while training any neural network with piecewise non-zero polynomial activations or ReLU, sigmoid activations. Our primary contribution is a single, general theorem that not only covers architectures for which this result was previously unknown but also consolidates existing results under weaker assumptions. While our focus is theoretical and our results are only exact in the infinitesimal step size limit, we nevertheless find excellent empirical agreement between the predictions of our result and those of the practical step-size gradient descent method.

Related papers

• Generalization Bound of Gradient Flow through Training Trajectory and Data-dependent Kernel [55.82768375605861]
  We establish a generalization bound for gradient flow that aligns with the classical Rademacher complexity for kernel methods.<n>Unlike static kernels such as NTK, the LPK captures the entire training trajectory, adapting to both data and optimization dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T23:17:09Z)
• AdaGrad under Anisotropic Smoothness [10.995979046710893]
  We propose a novel anisotropic generalized smoothness assumption and provide corresponding analyses of Adagrad. It is shown that under anisotropic smoothness and noise conditions, AdaGrad can achieve faster convergence guarantees in terms of better dimensional dependence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T15:29:31Z)
• On the Convergence of Gradient Descent for Large Learning Rates [55.33626480243135]
  We show that convergence is impossible when a fixed step size is used.<n>We provide a proof of this in the case of linear neural networks with a squared loss.<n>We also prove the impossibility of convergence for more general losses without requiring strong assumptions such as Lipschitz continuity for the gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T16:01:42Z)
• Convergence Analysis for Learning Orthonormal Deep Linear Neural Networks [27.29463801531576]
  We provide convergence analysis for training orthonormal deep linear neural networks. Our results shed light on how increasing the number of hidden layers can impact the convergence speed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-24T18:46:54Z)
• Towards Training Without Depth Limits: Batch Normalization Without Gradient Explosion [83.90492831583997]
  We show that a batch-normalized network can keep the optimal signal propagation properties, but avoid exploding gradients in depth. We use a Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) with linear activations and batch-normalization that provably has bounded depth. We also design an activation shaping scheme that empirically achieves the same properties for certain non-linear activations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-03T12:35:02Z)
• The Implicit Bias of Gradient Descent on Generalized Gated Linear Networks [3.3946853660795893]
  We derive the infinite-time training limit of a mathematically tractable class of deep nonlinear neural networks (GLNs) We show how architectural constraints and the implicit bias of gradient descent affect performance. By making the inductive bias explicit, our framework is poised to inform the development of more efficient, biologically plausible, and robust learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-05T22:37:39Z)
• Training invariances and the low-rank phenomenon: beyond linear networks [44.02161831977037]
  We show that when one trains a deep linear network with logistic or exponential loss on linearly separable data, the weights converge to rank-$1$ matrices. This is the first time a low-rank phenomenon is proven rigorously for nonlinear ReLU-activated feedforward networks. Our proof relies on a specific decomposition of the network into a multilinear function and another ReLU network whose weights are constant under a certain parameter directional convergence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-28T07:31:19Z)
• Optimization-Based Separations for Neural Networks [57.875347246373956]
  We show that gradient descent can efficiently learn ball indicator functions using a depth 2 neural network with two layers of sigmoidal activations. This is the first optimization-based separation result where the approximation benefits of the stronger architecture provably manifest in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-04T18:07:47Z)
• Proxy Convexity: A Unified Framework for the Analysis of Neural Networks Trained by Gradient Descent [95.94432031144716]
  We propose a unified non- optimization framework for the analysis of a learning network. We show that existing guarantees can be trained unified through gradient descent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-25T17:45:00Z)
• Learning Fast Approximations of Sparse Nonlinear Regression [50.00693981886832]
  In this work, we bridge the gap by introducing the Threshold Learned Iterative Shrinkage Algorithming (NLISTA) Experiments on synthetic data corroborate our theoretical results and show our method outperforms state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T11:31:08Z)
• Directional convergence and alignment in deep learning [38.73942298289583]
  We show that although the minimizers of cross-entropy and related classification losses at infinity, network weights learn by gradient flow converge in direction. This proof holds for deep homogeneous networks allowing for ReLU, max-pooling, linear, and convolutional layers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-11T17:50:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.