Radiology's Last Exam (RadLE): Benchmarking Frontier Multimodal AI Against Human Experts and a Taxonomy of Visual Reasoning Errors in Radiology

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25559v1
• Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2025 22:31:20 GMT
• Title: Radiology's Last Exam (RadLE): Benchmarking Frontier Multimodal AI Against Human Experts and a Taxonomy of Visual Reasoning Errors in Radiology
• Authors: Suvrankar Datta, Divya Buchireddygari, Lakshmi Vennela Chowdary Kaza, Mrudula Bhalke, Kautik Singh, Ayush Pandey, Sonit Sai Vasipalli, Upasana Karnwal, Hakikat Bir Singh Bhatti, Bhavya Ratan Maroo, Sanjana Hebbar, Rahul Joseph, Gurkawal Kaur, Devyani Singh, Akhil V, Dheeksha Devasya Shama Prasad, Nishtha Mahajan, Ayinaparthi Arisha, Rajesh Vanagundi, Reet Nandy, Kartik Vuthoo, Snigdhaa Rajvanshi, Nikhileswar Kondaveeti, Suyash Gunjal, Rishabh Jain, Rajat Jain, Anurag Agrawal,
• Abstract summary: General multimodal AI systems such as large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly accessed by clinicians and patients alike.<n>We developed a benchmark of 50 expert-level "spot diagnosis" cases across multiple imaging modalities.<n>We evaluated the performance of frontier AI models against board-certified radiologists and radiology trainees.
• Score: 2.626353375402704
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Generalist multimodal AI systems such as large language models (LLMs) and vision language models (VLMs) are increasingly accessed by clinicians and patients alike for medical image interpretation through widely available consumer-facing chatbots. Most evaluations claiming expert level performance are on public datasets containing common pathologies. Rigorous evaluation of frontier models on difficult diagnostic cases remains limited. We developed a pilot benchmark of 50 expert-level "spot diagnosis" cases across multiple imaging modalities to evaluate the performance of frontier AI models against board-certified radiologists and radiology trainees. To mirror real-world usage, the reasoning modes of five popular frontier AI models were tested through their native web interfaces, viz. OpenAI o3, OpenAI GPT-5, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Grok-4, and Claude Opus 4.1. Accuracy was scored by blinded experts, and reproducibility was assessed across three independent runs. GPT-5 was additionally evaluated across various reasoning modes. Reasoning quality errors were assessed and a taxonomy of visual reasoning errors was defined. Board-certified radiologists achieved the highest diagnostic accuracy (83%), outperforming trainees (45%) and all AI models (best performance shown by GPT-5: 30%). Reliability was substantial for GPT-5 and o3, moderate for Gemini 2.5 Pro and Grok-4, and poor for Claude Opus 4.1. These findings demonstrate that advanced frontier models fall far short of radiologists in challenging diagnostic cases. Our benchmark highlights the present limitations of generalist AI in medical imaging and cautions against unsupervised clinical use. We also provide a qualitative analysis of reasoning traces and propose a practical taxonomy of visual reasoning errors by AI models for better understanding their failure modes, informing evaluation standards and guiding more robust model development.

Related papers

• A DeepSeek-Powered AI System for Automated Chest Radiograph Interpretation in Clinical Practice [83.11942224668127]
  Janus-Pro-CXR (1B) is a chest X-ray interpretation system based on DeepSeek Janus-Pro model.<n>Our system outperforms state-of-the-art X-ray report generation models in automated report generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T13:26:13Z)
• RAD: Towards Trustworthy Retrieval-Augmented Multi-modal Clinical Diagnosis [56.373297358647655]
  Retrieval-Augmented Diagnosis (RAD) is a novel framework that injects external knowledge into multimodal models directly on downstream tasks.<n>RAD operates through three key mechanisms: retrieval and refinement of disease-centered knowledge from multiple medical sources, a guideline-enhanced contrastive loss transformer, and a dual decoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-24T10:36:14Z)
• How to Evaluate Medical AI [4.23552814358972]
  We introduce Relative Precision and Recall of Algorithmic Diagnostics (RPAD and RRAD)<n>RPAD and RRAD compare AI outputs against multiple expert opinions rather than a single reference.<n>Large-scale study shows that top-performing models, such as DeepSeek-V3, achieve consistency on par with or exceeding expert consensus.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-15T14:01:22Z)
• Design and Validation of a Responsible Artificial Intelligence-based System for the Referral of Diabetic Retinopathy Patients [65.57160385098935]
  Early detection of Diabetic Retinopathy can reduce the risk of vision loss by up to 95%.<n>We developed RAIS-DR, a Responsible AI System for DR screening that incorporates ethical principles across the AI lifecycle.<n>We evaluated RAIS-DR against the FDA-approved EyeArt system on a local dataset of 1,046 patients, unseen by both systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T21:54:11Z)
• Sequential Diagnosis with Language Models [21.22416732642907]
  We introduce the Sequential Diagnosis Benchmark, which transforms 304 diagnostically challenging cases into stepwise diagnostic encounters.<n>Performance is assessed not just by diagnostic accuracy but also by the cost of physician visits and tests performed.<n>We also present the MAI Diagnostic Orchestrator (MAI-DxO), a model-agnostic orchestrator that simulates a panel of physicians.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T17:27:26Z)
• ReXVQA: A Large-scale Visual Question Answering Benchmark for Generalist Chest X-ray Understanding [3.5568372183159203]
  ReXVQA is the largest and most comprehensive benchmark for visual question answering (VQA) in chest radiology.<n>It comprises approximately 696,000 questions paired with 160,000 chest X-rays studies across training, validation, and test sets.<n>We evaluate eight state-of-the-art multimodal large language models, including MedGemma-4B-it, Qwen2.5-VL, Janus-Pro-7B, and Eagle2-9B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-04T18:11:59Z)
• Potential of Multimodal Large Language Models for Data Mining of Medical Images and Free-text Reports [51.45762396192655]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently transformed many domains, significantly affecting the medical field. Notably, Gemini-Vision-series (Gemini) and GPT-4-series (GPT-4) models have epitomized a paradigm shift in Artificial General Intelligence for computer vision. This study evaluated the performance of the Gemini, GPT-4, and 4 popular large models for an exhaustive evaluation across 14 medical imaging datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T09:08:42Z)
• Towards a clinically accessible radiology foundation model: open-access and lightweight, with automated evaluation [113.5002649181103]
  Training open-source small multimodal models (SMMs) to bridge competency gaps for unmet clinical needs in radiology. For training, we assemble a large dataset of over 697 thousand radiology image-text pairs. For evaluation, we propose CheXprompt, a GPT-4-based metric for factuality evaluation, and demonstrate its parity with expert evaluation. The inference of LlaVA-Rad is fast and can be performed on a single V100 GPU in private settings, offering a promising state-of-the-art tool for real-world clinical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T18:12:02Z)
• A Concept-based Interpretable Model for the Diagnosis of Choroid Neoplasias using Multimodal Data [28.632437578685842]
  We focus on choroid neoplasias, the most prevalent form of eye cancer in adults, albeit rare with 5.1 per million. Our work introduces a concept-based interpretable model that distinguishes between three types of choroidal tumors, integrating insights from domain experts via radiological reports. Remarkably, this model achieves an F1 score of 0.91, rivaling that of black-box models, but also boosts the diagnostic accuracy of junior doctors by 42%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T07:15:53Z)
• Leveraging Professional Radiologists' Expertise to Enhance LLMs' Evaluation for Radiology Reports [22.599250713630333]
  Our proposed method synergizes the expertise of professional radiologists with Large Language Models (LLMs) Our approach aligns LLM evaluations with radiologist standards, enabling detailed comparisons between human and AI generated reports. Experimental results show that our "Detailed GPT-4 (5-shot)" model achieves a 0.48 score, outperforming the METEOR metric by 0.19.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T21:24:43Z)
• ChatRadio-Valuer: A Chat Large Language Model for Generalizable Radiology Report Generation Based on Multi-institution and Multi-system Data [115.0747462486285]
  ChatRadio-Valuer is a tailored model for automatic radiology report generation that learns generalizable representations. The clinical dataset utilized in this study encompasses a remarkable total of textbf332,673 observations. ChatRadio-Valuer consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models, especially ChatGPT (GPT-3.5-Turbo) and GPT-4 et al.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T17:23:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.