Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning Abilities
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25725v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 03:37:14 GMT
- Title: Atomic Thinking of LLMs: Decoupling and Exploring Mathematical Reasoning Abilities
- Authors: Jiayi Kuang, Haojing Huang, Yinghui Li, Xinnian Liang, Zhikun Xu, Yangning Li, Xiaoyu Tan, Chao Qu, Meishan Zhang, Ying Shen, Philip S. Yu,
- Abstract summary: We argue that current large-scale reasoning models rely on scaling up training datasets with diverse mathematical problems and long thinking chains.<n>In contrast, humans tend to break down complex problems into multiple fundamental atomic capabilities.<n>Our work categorizes atomic abilities into two dimensions: (1) field-specific abilities across four major mathematical fields, algebra, geometry, analysis, and topology, and (2) logical abilities at different levels, including conceptual understanding.
- Score: 81.86909922715368
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated outstanding performance in mathematical reasoning capabilities. However, we argue that current large-scale reasoning models primarily rely on scaling up training datasets with diverse mathematical problems and long thinking chains, which raises questions about whether LLMs genuinely acquire mathematical concepts and reasoning principles or merely remember the training data. In contrast, humans tend to break down complex problems into multiple fundamental atomic capabilities. Inspired by this, we propose a new paradigm for evaluating mathematical atomic capabilities. Our work categorizes atomic abilities into two dimensions: (1) field-specific abilities across four major mathematical fields, algebra, geometry, analysis, and topology, and (2) logical abilities at different levels, including conceptual understanding, forward multi-step reasoning with formal math language, and counterexample-driven backward reasoning. We propose corresponding training and evaluation datasets for each atomic capability unit, and conduct extensive experiments about how different atomic capabilities influence others, to explore the strategies to elicit the required specific atomic capability. Evaluation and experimental results on advanced models show many interesting discoveries and inspirations about the different performances of models on various atomic capabilities and the interactions between atomic capabilities. Our findings highlight the importance of decoupling mathematical intelligence into atomic components, providing new insights into model cognition and guiding the development of training strategies toward a more efficient, transferable, and cognitively grounded paradigm of "atomic thinking".
Related papers
- Can Atomic Step Decomposition Enhance the Self-structured Reasoning of Multimodal Large Models? [68.72260770171212]
We propose a paradigm of Self-structured Chain of Thought (SCoT), which is composed of minimal semantic atomic steps.<n>Our method can not only generate cognitive CoT structures for various complex tasks but also mitigates the phenomenon of overthinking.<n>We conduct extensive experiments to show that the proposed AtomThink significantly improves the performance of baseline MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-08T15:23:47Z) - AtomThink: Multimodal Slow Thinking with Atomic Step Reasoning [68.65389926175506]
We propose a novel paradigm of Self-structured Chain of Thought (SCoT)<n>Our method can not only generate cognitive CoT structures for various complex tasks but also mitigates the phenomena of overthinking for easier tasks.<n>We conduct extensive experiments to show that the proposed AtomThink significantly improves the performance of baseline MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-18T11:54:58Z) - MathBench: Evaluating the Theory and Application Proficiency of LLMs with a Hierarchical Mathematics Benchmark [82.64129627675123]
MathBench is a new benchmark that rigorously assesses the mathematical capabilities of large language models.
MathBench spans a wide range of mathematical disciplines, offering a detailed evaluation of both theoretical understanding and practical problem-solving skills.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-20T17:52:29Z) - Laying the Foundation First? Investigating the Generalization from Atomic Skills to Complex Reasoning Tasks [40.7766635942194]
We propose a probing framework to investigate whether the atomic skill can spontaneously generalize to complex reasoning tasks.
We then introduce a hierarchical curriculum learning training strategy to achieve better skill generalization.
By leveraging hierarchical curriculum learning, we successfully induce generalization, significantly improve the performance of open-source LMs on complex reasoning tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-14T15:20:54Z) - Towards a Holistic Understanding of Mathematical Questions with
Contrastive Pre-training [65.10741459705739]
We propose a novel contrastive pre-training approach for mathematical question representations, namely QuesCo.
We first design two-level question augmentations, including content-level and structure-level, which generate literally diverse question pairs with similar purposes.
Then, to fully exploit hierarchical information of knowledge concepts, we propose a knowledge hierarchy-aware rank strategy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-18T14:23:29Z) - A Survey of Deep Learning for Mathematical Reasoning [71.88150173381153]
We review the key tasks, datasets, and methods at the intersection of mathematical reasoning and deep learning over the past decade.
Recent advances in large-scale neural language models have opened up new benchmarks and opportunities to use deep learning for mathematical reasoning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-12-20T18:46:16Z) - Symbolic Regression in Materials Science: Discovering Interatomic
Potentials from Data [1.7149364927872015]
Machine learning can offset the high computational costs of ab initio atomic potentials.
symbolic regression is a powerful "white-box" approach for discovering functional forms of interatomic potentials.
Genetic programming-based approach for modeling atomic potentials is presented.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-06-13T19:05:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.