Improving Sampling Efficiency in RLVR through Adaptive Rollout and Response Reuse
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.25808v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 05:29:53 GMT
- Title: Improving Sampling Efficiency in RLVR through Adaptive Rollout and Response Reuse
- Abstract summary: We propose a sampling efficient RLVR algorithm that introduces two novel techniques: adaptive rollout and response reuse.<n>AR3PO consistently outperforms GRPO and matches or surpasses DAPO.<n>On the larger 32B model, AR3PO achieves comparable performance to DAPO at similar training steps while maintaining substantially lower rollout cost.
- Score: 43.07257245849851
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) have achieved impressive reasoning performance, with reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) emerging as a standard paradigm for post-training. A representative algorithm, group relative policy optimization (GRPO) (Shao et al., 2024), computes advantages by normalizing outcome rewards within response groups, but suffers from a vanishing advantage issue when all responses in a group receive identical rewards. To address this issue, we propose Adaptive Rollout and Response Reuse Policy Optimization (AR3PO), a sampling efficient RLVR algorithm that introduces two novel techniques: adaptive rollout, which dynamically allocates more responses to difficult prompts while saving computation on easier ones, and response reuse, which leverages previously generated correct responses to provide useful training signals. We compare AR3PO with strong RLVR baselines on multiple representative benchmarks using two different families of base models. Across the 7B and 8B models, AR3PO consistently outperforms GRPO and matches or surpasses DAPO (Yu et al., 2025), reducing rollout cost by up to 4.2x. On the larger 32B model, AR3PO achieves comparable performance to DAPO at similar training steps while maintaining substantially lower rollout cost.
Related papers
- Learning from Failures: Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization with Verifiable Rewards [73.44333771806282]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) has emerged as an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose Correction-Oriented Policy Optimization (CIPO), a simple and effective extension to RLVR that converts on-policy failed trajectories into correction-oriented supervision.<n>CIPO improves learning effectiveness while explicitly enhancing the model's ability to correct its own errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-14T08:22:21Z) - Where to Spend Rollouts: Hit-Utility Optimal Rollout Allocation for Group-Based RLVR [25.35547462790362]
Group-based policy optimization methods typically allocate a fixed number of rollouts to every prompt.<n>We introduce hit utility, the posterior probability that at least one rollout in a proposed additional allocation for a prompt will be correct.<n>We propose Hit-Utility Optimal Rollout Allocation (HORA), a learning-free rollout allocation policy.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-05-08T01:42:25Z) - Train Less, Learn More: Adaptive Efficient Rollout Optimization for Group-Based Reinforcement Learning [37.10958874118462]
Reinforcement learning (RL) plays a central role in large language model (LLM) post-training.<n>In GRPO, each query prompts the LLM to generate a group of rollouts with a fixed group size $N$.<n>When all rollouts in a group share the same outcome, either all correct or all incorrect, the group-normalized advantages become zero.<n>We introduce Adaptive Efficient Rollout Optimization (AERO), an enhancement of GRPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-15T23:14:05Z) - iGRPO: Self-Feedback-Driven LLM Reasoning [88.83313431248473]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown promise in solving complex mathematical problems, yet they still fall short of producing accurate and consistent solutions.<n>We introduce Iterative Group Relative Policy Optimization (iGRPO), a two-stage extension of GRPO that adds dynamic self-conditioning through model-generated drafts.<n>Under matched rollout budgets, iGRPO consistently outperforms GRPO across base models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T18:45:11Z) - Contextual Rollout Bandits for Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards [69.74686029941881]
Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Rewards (RLVR) is an effective paradigm for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models.<n>We propose a unified neural scheduling framework that adaptively selects high-value rollouts throughout training.<n>Experiments on six mathematical reasoning benchmarks demonstrate consistent gains in performance and training efficiency across multiple RLVR optimization methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-02-09T10:51:58Z) - GDPO: Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization for Multi-reward RL Optimization [133.27496265096445]
We show how to apply Group Relative Policy Optimization under multi-reward setting without examining its suitability.<n>We then introduce Group reward-Decoupled Normalization Policy Optimization (GDPO), a new policy optimization method to resolve these issues.<n>GDPO consistently outperforms GRPO, demonstrating its effectiveness and generalizability for multi-reward reinforcement learning optimization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-08T18:59:24Z) - IRPO: Scaling the Bradley-Terry Model via Reinforcement Learning [11.499402258204375]
Intergroup Relative Preference Optimization (IRPO) is a novel RL framework that incorporates the well-established Bradley-Terry model into GRPO.<n>By generating a pointwise score for each response, IRPO enables efficient evaluation of arbitrarily many candidates during RL training.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that IRPO achieves state-of-the-art (SOTA) performance among pointwise GRMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-02T12:57:06Z) - Value-Free Policy Optimization via Reward Partitioning [0.08192907805418585]
We introduce Reward Partitioning Optimization (RPO), a new method for single-trajectory reinforcement learning.<n>RPO normalizes observed rewards using a approach estimated directly from data.<n>We validate RPO on scalar-feedback language modeling tasks using Flan-T5 encoder-decoder models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-16T17:06:27Z) - Reverse Preference Optimization for Complex Instruction Following [61.39734201711077]
We propose a simple yet effective method called Reverse Preference Optimization (RPO)<n>It mitigates noise in preference pairs by dynamically reversing the constraints within the instruction to ensure the chosen response is perfect.<n>RPO scales effectively across model sizes, with the 70B RPO model surpassing GPT-4o.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-28T09:44:27Z) - REINFORCE++: An Efficient RLHF Algorithm with Robustness to Both Prompt and Reward Models [9.950083479263293]
REINFORCE++ is a novel approach that removes the critic model while using the global advantage normalization.<n>It exhibits robust performance across various reward models without requiring prompt set truncation.<n>It achieves superior generalization in both RLHF and long chain-of-thought settings.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-04T02:08:06Z) - Iterative Nash Policy Optimization: Aligning LLMs with General Preferences via No-Regret Learning [55.65738319966385]
We propose a novel online algorithm, iterative Nash policy optimization (INPO)<n>Unlike previous methods, INPO bypasses the need for estimating the expected win rate for individual responses.<n>With an LLaMA-3-8B-based SFT model, INPO achieves a 42.6% length-controlled win rate on AlpacaEval 2.0 and a 37.8% win rate on Arena-Hard.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-30T08:00:34Z) - REBEL: Reinforcement Learning via Regressing Relative Rewards [59.68420022466047]
We propose REBEL, a minimalist RL algorithm for the era of generative models.<n>In theory, we prove that fundamental RL algorithms like Natural Policy Gradient can be seen as variants of REBEL.<n>We find that REBEL provides a unified approach to language modeling and image generation with stronger or similar performance as PPO and DPO.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-25T17:20:45Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.