Agent-based code generation for the Gammapy framework

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26110v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 11:29:24 GMT
• Title: Agent-based code generation for the Gammapy framework
• Abstract summary: This contribution summarizes the design, reports our current status, and outlines next steps.<n>We develop an agent capable of writing, executing, and validating code in a controlled environment.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Software code generation using Large Language Models (LLMs) is one of the most successful applications of modern artificial intelligence. Foundational models are very effective for popular frameworks that benefit from documentation, examples, and strong community support. In contrast, specialized scientific libraries often lack these resources and may expose unstable APIs under active development, making it difficult for models trained on limited or outdated data. We address these issues for the Gammapy library by developing an agent capable of writing, executing, and validating code in a controlled environment. We present a minimal web demo and an accompanying benchmarking suite. This contribution summarizes the design, reports our current status, and outlines next steps.

Related papers

• PRAXIS: Graph-Grounded Tacit Knowledge for Domain Code Generation [61.752289169878566]
  We identify the root cause of the agent's lack of tacit knowledge, including domain-specific business rules, interface contracts, and operational conventions that developers internalize through practice but never document.<n>This knowledge is deeply buried beneath the domain code, across code entities and their dependency relations, and invisible to the agent that lacks it.<n>We propose PRAXIS, a framework that enables agents to extract, represent, and reuse tacit knowledge for domain code generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-20T08:28:28Z)
• Exploring the Agentic Frontier of Verilog Code Generation [21.677000877812063]
  We present the first systematic evaluation of agentic LLMs for Verilog generation.<n>We study how structured prompting and tool design affect performance.<n>We find that the performance gap between open and closed source models is driven by both higher crash rates and weaker tool output interpretation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-19T16:48:19Z)
• On LLM-Assisted Generation of Smart Contracts from Business Processes [0.08192907805418582]
  Large language models (LLMs) have changed the reality of how software is produced.<n>We present an exploratory study to investigate the use of LLMs for generating smart contract code from business process descriptions.<n>Our results show that LLM performance falls short of the perfect reliability required for smart contract development.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-30T20:39:45Z)
• Commit0: Library Generation from Scratch [77.38414688148006]
  Commit0 is a benchmark that challenges AI agents to write libraries from scratch.<n>Agents are provided with a specification document outlining the library's API as well as a suite of interactive unit tests.<n> Commit0 also offers an interactive environment where models receive static analysis and execution feedback on the code they generate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-02T18:11:30Z)
• Free and Customizable Code Documentation with LLMs: A Fine-Tuning Approach [0.0]
  We present a large language model (LLM)-based application that developers can use as a support tool to generate basic documentation for any publicly available repository.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T08:38:18Z)
• CodeRAG-Bench: Can Retrieval Augment Code Generation? [78.37076502395699]
  We conduct a systematic, large-scale analysis of code generation using retrieval-augmented generation.<n>We first curate a comprehensive evaluation benchmark, CodeRAG-Bench, encompassing three categories of code generation tasks.<n>We examine top-performing models on CodeRAG-Bench by providing contexts retrieved from one or multiple sources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T16:59:52Z)
• VersiCode: Towards Version-controllable Code Generation [58.82709231906735]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have made tremendous strides in code generation, but existing research fails to account for the dynamic nature of software development. We propose two novel tasks aimed at bridging this gap: version-specific code completion (VSCC) and version-aware code migration (VACM) We conduct an extensive evaluation on VersiCode, which reveals that version-controllable code generation is indeed a significant challenge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T16:15:06Z)
• RepoAgent: An LLM-Powered Open-Source Framework for Repository-level Code Documentation Generation [79.83270415843857]
  We introduce RepoAgent, a large language model powered open-source framework aimed at proactively generating, maintaining, and updating code documentation. We have validated the effectiveness of our approach, showing that RepoAgent excels in generating high-quality repository-level documentation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-26T15:39:52Z)
• Executable Code Actions Elicit Better LLM Agents [76.95566120678787]
  This work proposes to use Python code to consolidate Large Language Model (LLM) agents' actions into a unified action space (CodeAct) integrated with a Python interpreter, CodeAct can execute code actions and dynamically revise prior actions or emit new actions upon new observations through multi-turn interactions. The encouraging performance of CodeAct motivates us to build an open-source LLM agent that interacts with environments by executing interpretable code and collaborates with users using natural language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T21:38:58Z)
• Better Language Models of Code through Self-Improvement [18.75015225501755]
  We propose a simple data augmentation framework for pre-trained language models for code (PLMCs) Our framework utilizes knowledge gained during the pre-training and fine-tuning stage to generate pseudo data, which is then used as training data for the next step. The results show that our framework significantly improves PLMCs' performance in code-related sequence generation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-02T10:59:19Z)
• CodeLMSec Benchmark: Systematically Evaluating and Finding Security Vulnerabilities in Black-Box Code Language Models [58.27254444280376]
  Large language models (LLMs) for automatic code generation have achieved breakthroughs in several programming tasks. Training data for these models is usually collected from the Internet (e.g., from open-source repositories) and is likely to contain faults and security vulnerabilities. This unsanitized training data can cause the language models to learn these vulnerabilities and propagate them during the code generation procedure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-08T11:54:07Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.