Bubble, Bubble, AI's Rumble: Why Global Financial Regulatory Incident Reporting is Our Shield Against Systemic Stumbles

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26150v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 12:01:25 GMT
• Title: Bubble, Bubble, AI's Rumble: Why Global Financial Regulatory Incident Reporting is Our Shield Against Systemic Stumbles
• Authors: Anchal Gupta, Gleb Pappyshev, James T Kwok,
• Abstract summary: Current AI incident databases, reliant on crowdsourcing or news scraping, systematically over-look capital market anomalies.<n>We propose a regulatory-grade global database that synthesises post-trade reporting frameworks with proven incident documentation models from healthcare and aviation.<n>We call for immediate action to strengthen risk management and foster resilience in AI-driven financial markets against the volatile "cauldron" of AI-driven systemic risks.
• Score: 29.86669983369923
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: "Double, double toil and trouble; Fire burn and cauldron bubble." As Shakespeare's witches foretold chaos through cryptic prophecies, modern capital markets grapple with systemic risks concealed by opaque AI systems. According to IMF, the August 5, 2024, plunge in Japanese and U.S. equities can be linked to algorithmic trading yet ab-sent from existing AI incidents database exemplifies this transparency crisis. Current AI incident databases, reliant on crowdsourcing or news scraping, systematically over-look capital market anomalies, particularly in algorithmic and high-frequency trading. We address this critical gap by proposing a regulatory-grade global database that elegantly synthesises post-trade reporting frameworks with proven incident documentation models from healthcare and aviation. Our framework's temporal data omission technique masking timestamps while preserving percent-age-based metrics enables sophisticated cross-jurisdictional analysis of emerging risks while safeguarding confidential business information. Synthetic data validation (modelled after real life published incidents , sentiments, data) reveals compelling pat-terns: systemic risks transcending geographical boundaries, market manipulation clusters distinctly identifiable via K-means algorithms, and AI system typology exerting significantly greater influence on trading behaviour than geographical location, This tripartite solution empowers regulators with unprecedented cross-jurisdictional oversight, financial institutions with seamless compliance integration, and investors with critical visibility into previously obscured AI-driven vulnerabilities. We call for immediate action to strengthen risk management and foster resilience in AI-driven financial markets against the volatile "cauldron" of AI-driven systemic risks., promoting global financial stability through enhanced transparency and coordinated oversight.

Related papers

• Frontier AI Risk Management Framework in Practice: A Risk Analysis Technical Report v1.5 [61.787178868669265]
  This technical report presents an updated and granular assessment of five critical dimensions: cyber offense, persuasion and manipulation, strategic deception, uncontrolled AI R&D, and self-replication.<n>This work reflects our current understanding of AI frontier risks and urges collective action to mitigate these challenges.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-16T04:30:06Z)
• WebCryptoAgent: Agentic Crypto Trading with Web Informatics [14.90235632188933]
  WebCryptoAgent is an agentic trading framework that decomposes web-informed decision making into modality-specific agents.<n>We introduce a decoupled control architecture that separates strategic hourly reasoning from a real-time second-level risk model.<n>Experiments on real-world cryptocurrency markets demonstrate that WebCryptoAgent improves trading stability, reduces spurious activity, and enhances tail-risk handling compared to existing baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-08T07:55:10Z)
• AI, Digital Platforms, and the New Systemic Risk [2.0090452213078445]
  We develop a rigorous framework for understanding systemic risk in AI, platform, and hybrid system governance.<n>We argue that recent legislation, including the EU's AI Act and Digital Services Act, invokes systemic risk but relies on narrow or ambiguous characterizations.<n>Our framework highlights novel risk pathways, including the possibility of systemic failures arising from the interaction of multiple AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T15:14:23Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• When Autonomy Goes Rogue: Preparing for Risks of Multi-Agent Collusion in Social Systems [78.04679174291329]
  We introduce a proof-of-concept to simulate the risks of malicious multi-agent systems (MAS)<n>We apply this framework to two high-risk fields: misinformation spread and e-commerce fraud.<n>Our findings show that decentralized systems are more effective at carrying out malicious actions than centralized ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-19T15:17:30Z)
• Rethinking Data Protection in the (Generative) Artificial Intelligence Era [138.07763415496288]
  We propose a four-level taxonomy that captures the diverse protection needs arising in modern (generative) AI models and systems.<n>Our framework offers a structured understanding of the trade-offs between data utility and control, spanning the entire AI pipeline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-03T02:45:51Z)
• The Problem of Algorithmic Collisions: Mitigating Unforeseen Risks in a Connected World [2.8775022881551666]
  The increasing deployment of Artificial Intelligence (AI) and other autonomous algorithmic systems presents the world with new systemic risks.<n>Current governance frameworks are inadequate as they lack visibility into this complex ecosystem of interactions.<n>This paper outlines the nature of this challenge and proposes some initial policy suggestions centered on increasing transparency and accountability through phased system registration, a licensing framework for deployment, and enhanced monitoring capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-26T16:22:18Z)
• Risk Management for Distributed Arbitrage Systems: Integrating Artificial Intelligence [0.0]
  This study offers a survey and comparative analysis of the integration of artificial intelligence in risk management for distributed arbitrage systems.<n>We examine several modern caching techniques namely in memory caching, distributed caching, and proxy caching and their functions in enhancing performance in decentralized settings.<n>This comparison research evaluates various case studies from prominent DeFi technologies, emphasizing critical performance metrics like latency reduction, load balancing, and system resilience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-24T01:15:43Z)
• Deep Learning Approaches for Anti-Money Laundering on Mobile Transactions: Review, Framework, and Directions [51.43521977132062]
  Money laundering is a financial crime that obscures the origin of illicit funds.<n>The proliferation of mobile payment platforms and smart IoT devices has significantly complicated anti-money laundering investigations.<n>This paper conducts a comprehensive review of deep learning solutions and the challenges associated with their use in AML.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T05:19:44Z)
• Coordinated Flaw Disclosure for AI: Beyond Security Vulnerabilities [1.3225694028747144]
  We propose a Coordinated Flaw Disclosure framework tailored to the complexities of machine learning (ML) issues. Our framework introduces innovations such as extended model cards, dynamic scope expansion, an independent adjudication panel, and an automated verification process. We argue that CFD could significantly enhance public trust in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T20:39:04Z)
• Adverse Media Mining for KYC and ESG Compliance [2.381399746981591]
  Adverse media or negative news screening is crucial for the identification of such non-financial risks. We present an automated system to conduct both real-time and batch search of adverse media for users' queries. Our scalable, machine-learning driven approach to high-precision, adverse news filtering is based on four perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-22T01:04:16Z)
• Taking Over the Stock Market: Adversarial Perturbations Against Algorithmic Traders [47.32228513808444]
  We present a realistic scenario in which an attacker influences algorithmic trading systems by using adversarial learning techniques. We show that when added to the input stream, our perturbation can fool the trading algorithms at future unseen data points.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-19T06:28:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.