MENLO: From Preferences to Proficiency - Evaluating and Modeling Native-like Quality Across 47 Languages

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2509.26601v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 17:48:58 GMT
• Title: MENLO: From Preferences to Proficiency - Evaluating and Modeling Native-like Quality Across 47 Languages
• Authors: Chenxi Whitehouse, Sebastian Ruder, Tony Lin, Oksana Kurylo, Haruka Takagi, Janice Lam, Nicolò Busetto, Denise Diaz,
• Abstract summary: We introduce MENLO, a framework that operationalizes the evaluation of native-like response quality based on audience-inspired mechanisms.<n>We create a dataset of 6,423 human-annotated prompt-response preference pairs covering four quality dimensions with high inter-annotator agreement in 47 language varieties.
• Score: 18.278876042011383
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Ensuring native-like quality of large language model (LLM) responses across many languages is challenging. To address this, we introduce MENLO, a framework that operationalizes the evaluation of native-like response quality based on audience design-inspired mechanisms. Using MENLO, we create a dataset of 6,423 human-annotated prompt-response preference pairs covering four quality dimensions with high inter-annotator agreement in 47 language varieties. Our evaluation reveals that zero-shot LLM judges benefit significantly from pairwise evaluation and our structured annotation rubrics, yet they still underperform human annotators on our dataset. We demonstrate substantial improvements through fine-tuning with reinforcement learning, reward shaping, and multi-task learning approaches. Additionally, we show that RL-trained judges can serve as generative reward models to enhance LLMs' multilingual proficiency, though discrepancies with human judgment remain. Our findings suggest promising directions for scalable multilingual evaluation and preference alignment. We release our dataset and evaluation framework to support further research in multilingual LLM evaluation.

Related papers

• How Reliable is Multilingual LLM-as-a-Judge? [11.639184489330368]
  We evaluate five models from different model families across five diverse tasks involving 25 languages.<n>We find that consistency varies significantly across languages, with particularly poor performance in low-resource languages.<n>We propose an ensemble strategy which improves the consistency of the multilingual judge in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-18T02:32:35Z)
• M-Prometheus: A Suite of Open Multilingual LLM Judges [64.22940792713713]
  We introduce M-Prometheus, a suite of open-weight LLM judges that can provide both direct assessment and pairwise comparison feedback on multilingual outputs.<n>M-Prometheus models outperform state-of-the-art open LLM judges on multilingual reward benchmarks spanning more than 20 languages, as well as on literary machine translation (MT) evaluation covering 4 language pairs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T11:37:26Z)
• MMLU-ProX: A Multilingual Benchmark for Advanced Large Language Model Evaluation [86.7047714187813]
  MMLU-ProX is a benchmark covering 29 languages, built on an English benchmark.<n>Each language version consists of 11,829 identical questions, enabling direct cross-linguistic comparisons.<n>To meet efficient evaluation needs, we provide a lite version containing 658 questions per language.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-13T15:59:20Z)
• Challenges in Adapting Multilingual LLMs to Low-Resource Languages using LoRA PEFT Tuning [0.4194295877935868]
  This study investigates the effects of Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) -Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) on multilingual Gemma models for Marathi.<n>Using a translated dataset with 52,000 instruction-response pairs, our findings reveal that while evaluation performance decline post-fine-tuning, manual assessments frequently suggest that the fine-tuned models outperform their original counterparts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-27T18:14:38Z)
• Cross-Lingual Auto Evaluation for Assessing Multilingual LLMs [36.30321941154582]
  Hercule is a cross-lingual evaluation model that learns to assign scores to responses based on easily available reference answers in English.<n>This study is the first comprehensive examination of cross-lingual evaluation using LLMs, presenting a scalable and effective approach for multilingual assessment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T09:45:32Z)
• OMGEval: An Open Multilingual Generative Evaluation Benchmark for Large Language Models [59.54423478596468]
  We introduce OMGEval, the first Open-source Multilingual Generative test set that can assess the capability of LLMs in different languages. For each language, OMGEval provides 804 open-ended questions, covering a wide range of important capabilities of LLMs. Specifically, the current version of OMGEval includes 5 languages (i.e., Zh, Ru, Fr, Es, Ar)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T04:42:41Z)
• LLaMA Beyond English: An Empirical Study on Language Capability Transfer [49.298360366468934]
  We focus on how to effectively transfer the capabilities of language generation and following instructions to a non-English language. We analyze the impact of key factors such as vocabulary extension, further pretraining, and instruction tuning on transfer. We employ four widely used standardized testing benchmarks: C-Eval, MMLU, AGI-Eval, and GAOKAO-Bench.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T06:29:02Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
  We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages. Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba) We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z)
• Are Large Language Model-based Evaluators the Solution to Scaling Up Multilingual Evaluation? [20.476500441734427]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel in various Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. Their evaluation, particularly in languages beyond the top $20$, remains inadequate due to existing benchmarks and metrics limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-14T06:41:58Z)
• CMMLU: Measuring massive multitask language understanding in Chinese [133.70911295934746]
  This paper introduces a comprehensive Chinese benchmark that covers various subjects, including natural science, social sciences, engineering, and humanities. CMMLU fills the gap in evaluating the knowledge and reasoning capabilities of large language models within the Chinese context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T15:49:51Z)
• Evaluating the Performance of Large Language Models on GAOKAO Benchmark [53.663757126289795]
  This paper introduces GAOKAO-Bench, an intuitive benchmark that employs questions from the Chinese GAOKAO examination as test samples. With human evaluation, we obtain the converted total score of LLMs, including GPT-4, ChatGPT and ERNIE-Bot. We also use LLMs to grade the subjective questions, and find that model scores achieve a moderate level of consistency with human scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T14:39:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.