ARS: Adaptive Reasoning Suppression for Efficient Large Reasoning Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00071v2
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 15:04:19 GMT
• Title: ARS: Adaptive Reasoning Suppression for Efficient Large Reasoning Language Models
• Authors: Dongqi Zheng,
• Abstract summary: Reasoning Suppression (ARS) is a training-free approach that dynamically suppresses redundant reasoning steps.<n>ARS achieves up to 53%, 46.1%, and 57.9% in token, latency and energy reduction, while maintaining or improving accuracy.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Reasoning Language Models (LRLMs or LRMs) demonstrate remarkable capabilities in complex reasoning tasks, but suffer from significant computational inefficiencies due to overthinking phenomena. Existing efficient reasoning methods face the challenge of balancing reasoning quality with inference cost reduction. We propose \textbf{Adaptive Reasoning Suppression (ARS)}, a novel training-free approach that dynamically suppresses redundant reasoning steps while preserving accuracy through adaptive certainty monitoring. ARS introduces a multi-checkpoint certainty estimation mechanism with progressive suppression thresholds, achieving superior efficiency compared to static suppression methods. Our extensive evaluation across mathematical reasoning benchmarks using multiple model architectures demonstrates that ARS achieves up to 53%, 46.1%, and 57.9% in token, latency and energy reduction, while maintaining or improving accuracy.

Related papers

• Stable Adaptive Thinking via Advantage Shaping and Length-Aware Gradient Regulation [14.501114943020589]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) achieve strong performance through extended reasoning traces.<n>LRMs often exhibit overthinking behavior for low-complexity queries.<n>We propose a two-stage framework for stable adaptive thinking in LRMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-26T02:49:36Z)
• EntroCut: Entropy-Guided Adaptive Truncation for Efficient Chain-of-Thought Reasoning in Small-scale Large Reasoning Models [42.49934375597466]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) excel at complex reasoning tasks through extended chain-of-thought generation.<n>We find that the entropy of the model's output distribution in early reasoning steps reliably distinguishes correct from incorrect reasoning.<n>We propose EntroCut, a training-free method that dynamically truncates reasoning by identifying high-confidence states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-30T06:19:16Z)
• Identifying and Transferring Reasoning-Critical Neurons: Improving LLM Inference Reliability via Activation Steering [50.63386303357225]
  We propose AdaRAS, a lightweight test-time framework that improves reasoning reliability by selectively intervening on neuron activations.<n>AdaRAS identifies Reasoning-Critical Neurons (RCNs) via a polarity-aware mean-difference criterion and adaptively steers their activations during inference.<n> Experiments on 10 mathematics and coding benchmarks demonstrate consistent improvements, including over 13% gains on AIME-24 and AIME-25.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T17:53:01Z)
• Aware First, Think Less: Dynamic Boundary Self-Awareness Drives Extreme Reasoning Efficiency in Large Language Models [38.225442399592936]
  We introduce the Dynamic Reasoning-Boundary Self-Awareness Framework (DR. SAF)<n>DR. SAF integrates three key components: Boundary Self-Awareness Alignment, Adaptive Reward Management, and a Boundary Preservation Mechanism.<n>Our experimental results demonstrate that DR. SAF achieves a 49.27% reduction in total response tokens with minimal loss in accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-15T16:40:29Z)
• MUR: Momentum Uncertainty guided Reasoning for Large Language Models [23.766037094142117]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved impressive performance on reasoning-intensive tasks.<n>Momentum Uncertainty-guided Reasoning (MUR) allocates thinking budgets to critical reasoning steps by tracking and aggregating stepwise uncertainty over time.<n>Results demonstrate that MUR reduces by over 50% on average while improving accuracy by 0.62-3.37%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-20T13:36:19Z)
• Lost at the Beginning of Reasoning [82.18834329384514]
  We show that the first reasoning step exerts a disproportionately large influence on the final prediction.<n>We propose an efficient sampling strategy that leverages a reward model to identify and retain high-quality first reasoning steps.<n>We introduce a new benchmark specifically constructed with deliberately flawed first reasoning steps to systematically evaluate model self-correction capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T09:53:57Z)
• Exploring and Exploiting the Inherent Efficiency within Large Reasoning Models for Self-Guided Efficiency Enhancement [101.77467538102924]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) exhibit overthinking, which hinders efficiency and inflates inference cost.<n>We propose two lightweight methods to enhance LRM efficiency.<n>First, we introduce Efficiency Steering, a training-free activation steering technique that modulates reasoning behavior via a single direction.<n>Second, we develop Self-Rewarded Efficiency RL, a reinforcement learning framework that dynamically balances task accuracy and brevity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-18T17:18:12Z)
• Reasoning Models Are More Easily Gaslighted Than You Think [85.84943447589511]
  We evaluate three state-of-the-art reasoning models, including OpenAI's o4-mini, Claude-3.7-Sonnet and Gemini-2.5-Flash.<n>Our evaluation reveals significant accuracy drops following gaslighting negation prompts.<n>We introduce GaslightingBench-R, a new diagnostic benchmark designed to evaluate reasoning models' susceptibility to defend their belief.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T12:52:25Z)
• Don't Think Longer, Think Wisely: Optimizing Thinking Dynamics for Large Reasoning Models [68.96619605651155]
  Large reasoning models (LRMs) may drastically increase the output length due to overthinking.<n>We propose a dynamic optimization framework that segments model-generated reasoning paths into distinct thinking patterns.<n>Our method achieves up to a 12% accuracy improvement and reducing token usage from approximately 5,000 to 3,000 tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T20:59:29Z)
• Think or Not? Exploring Thinking Efficiency in Large Reasoning Models via an Information-Theoretic Lens [51.90059610606049]
  This paper revisits the efficiency of such reasoning processes through an information-theoretic lens.<n>We propose two metrics, InfoBias and InfoGain, to quantify divergence from ideal reasoning paths and stepwise information contribution.<n>Motivated by these findings, we introduce an entropy-based Adaptive Think strategy that dynamically halts reasoning once confidence is sufficiently high.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-23T13:38:56Z)
• ConCISE: Confidence-guided Compression in Step-by-step Efficient Reasoning [64.93140713419561]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) perform strongly in complex reasoning tasks via Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, but often suffer from verbose outputs.<n>Existing fine-tuning-based compression methods either operate post-hoc pruning, risking disruption to reasoning coherence, or rely on sampling-based selection.<n>We introduce ConCISE, a framework designed to generate concise reasoning chains, integrating Confidence Injection to boost reasoning confidence, and Early Stopping to terminate reasoning when confidence is sufficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-08T01:40:40Z)
• Derailer-Rerailer: Adaptive Verification for Efficient and Reliable Language Model Reasoning [11.765298236504155]
  Derailer-Rerailer is a novel framework that balances reasoning accuracy and computational efficiency.<n>Our framework achieves significant accuracy improvements (8-11% across various reasoning tasks) while maintaining 2-3 times better efficiency than existing verification methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T21:20:17Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.