Personalized Reasoning: Just-In-Time Personalization and Why LLMs Fail At It

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.00177v1
• Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 18:55:28 GMT
• Title: Personalized Reasoning: Just-In-Time Personalization and Why LLMs Fail At It
• Abstract summary: Current large language model (LLM) development treats task-solving and preference alignment as separate challenges.<n>We introduce PREFDISCO, an evaluation methodology that transforms static benchmarks into interactive personalization tasks.<n>Our framework creates scenarios where identical questions require different reasoning chains depending on user context.
• Score: 81.50711040539566
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Current large language model (LLM) development treats task-solving and preference alignment as separate challenges, optimizing first for objective correctness, then for alignment to aggregated human preferences. This paradigm fails in human-facing applications where solving a problem correctly is insufficient if the response mismatches the user's needs. This challenge intensifies in just-in-time scenarios where no prior user interaction history exists due to cold-start conditions or privacy constraints. LLMs need to identify what they don't know about user preferences, strategically elicit preference values through questioning, then adapt their reasoning processes and responses accordingly -- a complicated chain of cognitive processes which we term personalized reasoning. We introduce PREFDISCO, an evaluation methodology that transforms static benchmarks into interactive personalization tasks using psychologically-grounded personas with sparse preferences. Our framework creates scenarios where identical questions require different reasoning chains depending on user context, as optimal explanation approaches vary by individual expertise and preferences while maintaining factual accuracy. Evaluation of 21 frontier models across 10 tasks reveals 29.0% of naive personalization attempts produce worse preference alignment than generic responses, yet generic responses also fail to serve individual user needs effectively. These findings suggest personalized reasoning requires dedicated development rather than emerging naturally. PREFDISCO establishes personalized reasoning as a measurable research frontier and reveals fundamental limitations in current LLMs' interactive capabilities, providing a foundation for developing systems that can adapt to individual users in education, healthcare, and technical domains where personalization is critical.

Related papers

• Evaluating the Hidden Costs of Personalization in Large Language Models [55.07935163900691]
  We identify three emerging risks: (1) irrelevant personalization, where models reference personal information in unnecessary contexts; (2) preference narrowing, where models reinforce informational echo chambers; and (3) sycophantic bias, where models agree excessively with user opinions.<n>We propose PRISK, a dynamic evaluation framework with automated data generation and tailored metrics that uncovers systematic limitations in current AI assistants.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-08-28T20:05:12Z)
• Large Language Models Should Learn Personalized Rather Than Aggregated Human Preferences [2.276729420256043]
  We show that aggregation masks critical information about preference diversity, individual values, and contextual dependencies.<n>We conclude with a concrete research and policy agenda for developing preference-aware models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-30T18:47:52Z)
• Preference-Aware Rubric Learning for Personalized Evaluation [59.539429430690156]
  Existing evaluation methods fail to capture user-specific preferences embedded in long-term interaction histories.<n>We propose Personalized Evaluation as Learning, a paradigm that formulates personalized evaluation as a learning problem rather than a static judgment.<n>Experiments show that PARL consistently induces high-fidelity rubrics that reliably identify user-aligned responses and generalize across users.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-29T17:00:55Z)
• Learning Transferable Latent User Preferences for Human-Aligned Decision Making [4.1789291746171715]
  Human-aligned decision making requires accounting for both explicitly stated goals and latent user preferences.<n>We introduce CLIPR (Conversational Learning for Inferring Preferences and Reasoning), a framework that learns actionable, transferable natural language rules.<n> Evaluations on three datasets and a user study show that CLIPR consistently outperforms existing methods in improving alignment and reducing inference costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-05-12T19:32:10Z)
• Towards Realistic Personalization: Evaluating Long-Horizon Preference Following in Personalized User-LLM Interactions [50.70965714314064]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly serving as personal assistants, where users share complex and diverse preferences over extended interactions.<n>This work proposes RealPref, a benchmark for evaluating realistic preference-following in personalized user-LLM interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-04T15:42:43Z)
• Synthetic Interaction Data for Scalable Personalization in Large Language Models [67.31884245564086]
  We introduce a high-fidelity synthetic data generation framework called PersonaGym.<n>Unlike prior work that treats personalization as static persona-preference pairs, PersonaGym models a dynamic preference process.<n>We release PersonaAtlas, a large-scale, high-quality, and diverse synthetic dataset of high-fidelity multi-turn personalized interaction trajectories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-12T20:41:22Z)
• Towards Proactive Personalization through Profile Customization for Individual Users in Dialogues [28.522406727886395]
  PersonalAgent is a lifelong agent designed to continuously infer and adapt to user preferences.<n>Experiments show that PersonalAgent achieves superior performance over strong prompt-based and policy optimization baselines.<n>Our findings underscore the importance of lifelong personalization for developing more inclusive and adaptive conversational agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-17T10:47:06Z)
• Towards Effective Model Editing for LLM Personalization [36.236438676571034]
  We conceptualize personalization as a model editing task and introduce Personalization Editing.<n>This framework applies localized edits guided by clustered preference representations.<n>It achieves higher editing accuracy and greater computational efficiency than fine-tuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-15T18:58:15Z)
• Pathways of Thoughts: Multi-Directional Thinking for Long-form Personalized Question Answering [57.12316804290369]
  Personalization is essential for adapting question answering systems to user-specific information needs.<n>We propose Pathways of Thoughts (PoT), an inference-stage method that applies to any large language model (LLM) without requiring task-specific fine-tuning.<n>PoT consistently outperforms competitive baselines, achieving up to a 13.1% relative improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-23T14:44:46Z)
• NextQuill: Causal Preference Modeling for Enhancing LLM Personalization [82.15961484963256]
  We introduce NextQuill, a novel personalization framework grounded in causal preference modeling.<n>Building on this insight, NextQuill introduces two complementary alignment strategies.<n> Experiments across multiple personalization benchmarks demonstrate that NextQuill significantly improves personalization quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T02:08:55Z)
• A Survey on Personalized Alignment -- The Missing Piece for Large Language Models in Real-World Applications [28.181295575180293]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities, yet their transition to real-world applications reveals a critical limitation.<n>This paper presents the first comprehensive survey of personalized alignment.<n>We propose a unified framework comprising preference memory management, personalized generation, and feedback-based alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T10:09:16Z)
• FSPO: Few-Shot Preference Optimization of Synthetic Preference Data in LLMs Elicits Effective Personalization to Real Users [111.56469697145519]
  We propose Few-Shot Preference Optimization, which reframes reward modeling as a meta-learning problem.<n>Under this framework, an LLM learns to quickly adapt to a user via a few labeled preferences from that user, constructing a personalized reward function for them.<n>We generate over 1M synthetic personalized preferences using publicly available LLMs.<n>We evaluate FSPO on personalized open-ended generation for up to 1,500 synthetic users across three domains: movie reviews, pedagogical adaptation based on educational background, and general question answering, along with a controlled human study.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T17:08:46Z)
• Few-shot Steerable Alignment: Adapting Rewards and LLM Policies with Neural Processes [50.544186914115045]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly embedded in everyday applications.<n> Ensuring their alignment with the diverse preferences of individual users has become a critical challenge.<n>We present a novel framework for few-shot steerable alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-18T16:14:59Z)
• Aligning LLMs with Individual Preferences via Interaction [51.72200436159636]
  We train large language models (LLMs) that can ''interact to align''<n>We develop a multi-turn preference dataset containing 3K+ multi-turn conversations in tree structures.<n>For evaluation, we establish the ALOE benchmark, consisting of 100 carefully selected examples and well-designed metrics to measure the customized alignment performance during conversations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-04T17:48:29Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.