Data Selection for Fine-tuning Vision Language Models via Cross Modal Alignment Trajectories

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.01454v1
• Date: Wed, 01 Oct 2025 20:47:29 GMT
• Title: Data Selection for Fine-tuning Vision Language Models via Cross Modal Alignment Trajectories
• Authors: Nilay Naharas, Dang Nguyen, Nesihan Bulut, Mohammadhossein Bateni, Vahab Mirrokni, Baharan Mirzasoleiman,
• Abstract summary: We propose the first principled method for data-efficient instruction tuning of Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)<n>XMAS clusters examples based on the trajectories of the top singular values of their attention matrices obtained from fine-tuning a small proxy LVLM.<n>XMAS can discard 50% of the LLaVA-665k dataset and 85% of the Vision-Flan dataset while preserving performance of LLaVA-1.5-7B on 10 downstream benchmarks.
• Score: 45.580892667483674
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Data-efficient learning aims to eliminate redundancy in large training datasets by training models on smaller subsets of the most informative examples. While data selection has been extensively explored for vision models and large language models (LLMs), it remains underexplored for Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs). Notably, none of existing methods can outperform random selection at different subset sizes. In this work, we propose the first principled method for data-efficient instruction tuning of LVLMs. We prove that examples with similar cross-modal attention matrices during instruction tuning have similar gradients. Thus, they influence model parameters in a similar manner and convey the same information to the model during training. Building on this insight, we propose XMAS, which clusters examples based on the trajectories of the top singular values of their attention matrices obtained from fine-tuning a small proxy LVLM. By sampling a balanced subset from these clusters, XMAS effectively removes redundancy in large-scale LVLM training data. Extensive experiments show that XMAS can discard 50% of the LLaVA-665k dataset and 85% of the Vision-Flan dataset while fully preserving performance of LLaVA-1.5-7B on 10 downstream benchmarks and speeding up its training by 1.2x. This is 30% more data reduction compared to the best baseline for LLaVA-665k. The project's website can be found at https://bigml-cs-ucla.github.io/XMAS-project-page/.

Related papers

• SPaRFT: Self-Paced Reinforcement Fine-Tuning for Large Language Models [51.74498855100541]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown strong reasoning capabilities when fine-tuned with reinforcement learning (RL)<n>We propose textbfSPaRFT, a self-paced learning framework that enables efficient learning based on the capability of the model being trained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T03:50:48Z)
• LIMR: Less is More for RL Scaling [25.477841726836836]
  We introduce Learning Impact Measurement (LIM), an automated method to evaluate and prioritize training samples.<n>Our method achieves comparable or even superior performance using only 1,389 samples versus the full 8,523 samples dataset.<n>For reproducible research and future innovation, we are open-sourcing LIMR, including implementation of LIM, training and evaluation code, curated datasets, and trained models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T15:13:29Z)
• Concept-skill Transferability-based Data Selection for Large Vision-Language Models [56.0725292404808]
  We introduce COINCIDE, an effective and scalable data selection technique for training vision-language models. We cluster the training data using internal activations from a small model, which identifies concept-skill compositions needed by a target LVLM. Experiments demonstrate that COINCIDE achieves superior performance and data selection efficiency against 8 strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-16T16:15:20Z)
• How to Train Data-Efficient LLMs [56.41105687693619]
  We study data-efficient approaches for pre-training language models (LLMs) We find that Ask-LLM and Density sampling are the best methods in their respective categories. In our comparison of 19 samplers, involving hundreds of evaluation tasks and pre-training runs, we find that Ask-LLM and Density are the best methods in their respective categories.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-15T02:27:57Z)
• MoE-LLaVA: Mixture of Experts for Large Vision-Language Models [49.32669226551026]
  We propose a simple yet effective training strategy MoE-Tuning for LVLMs.<n>MoE-LLaVA, a MoE-based sparse LVLM architecture, uniquely activates only the top-k experts through routers.<n>Experiments show the significant performance of MoE-LLaVA in a variety of visual understanding and object hallucination benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T08:13:40Z)
• Bad Students Make Great Teachers: Active Learning Accelerates Large-Scale Visual Understanding [9.112203072394648]
  Power-law scaling indicates that large-scale training with uniform sampling is prohibitively slow. Active learning methods aim to increase data efficiency by prioritizing learning on the most relevant examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-08T19:26:13Z)
• Distilling Step-by-Step! Outperforming Larger Language Models with Less Training Data and Smaller Model Sizes [91.58845026796149]
  We introduce Distilling step-by-step, a new mechanism that trains small models that outperform large language models. We present three findings across 4 NLP benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-03T17:50:56Z)
• Complementary Ensemble Learning [1.90365714903665]
  We derive a technique to improve performance of state-of-the-art deep learning models. Specifically, we train auxiliary models which are able to complement state-of-the-art model uncertainty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T03:23:05Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.