Model-brain comparison using inter-animal transforms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.02523v1
• Date: Thu, 02 Oct 2025 19:51:55 GMT
• Title: Model-brain comparison using inter-animal transforms
• Authors: Imran Thobani, Javier Sagastuy-Brena, Aran Nayebi, Jacob Prince, Rosa Cao, Daniel Yamins,
• Abstract summary: We propose a comparison methodology based on the Inter-Animal Transform Class.<n>We identify the IATC in three settings: a simulated population of neural network models, a population of mouse subjects, and a population of human subjects.<n>We find that the IATC enables accurate predictions of neural activity while also achieving high specificity in mechanism identification.
• Score: 2.272803181721709
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Artificial neural network models have emerged as promising mechanistic models of the brain. However, there is little consensus on the correct method for comparing model activations to brain responses. Drawing on recent work in philosophy of neuroscience, we propose a comparison methodology based on the Inter-Animal Transform Class (IATC) - the strictest set of functions needed to accurately map neural responses between subjects in an animal population. Using the IATC, we can map bidirectionally between a candidate model's responses and brain data, assessing how well the model can masquerade as a typical subject using the same kinds of transforms needed to map across real subjects. We identify the IATC in three settings: a simulated population of neural network models, a population of mouse subjects, and a population of human subjects. We find that the IATC resolves detailed aspects of the neural mechanism, such as the non-linear activation function. Most importantly, we find that the IATC enables accurate predictions of neural activity while also achieving high specificity in mechanism identification, evidenced by its ability to separate response patterns from different brain areas while strongly aligning same-brain-area responses between subjects. In other words, the IATC is a proof-by-existence that there is no inherent tradeoff between the neural engineering goal of high model-brain predictivity and the neuroscientific goal of identifying mechanistically accurate brain models. Using IATC-guided transforms, we obtain new evidence in favor of topographical deep neural networks (TDANNs) as models of the visual system. Overall, the IATC enables principled model-brain comparisons, contextualizing previous findings about the predictive success of deep learning models of the brain, while improving upon previous approaches to model-brain comparison.

Related papers

• SynBrain: Enhancing Visual-to-fMRI Synthesis via Probabilistic Representation Learning [54.390403684665834]
  Deciphering how visual stimuli are transformed into cortical responses is a fundamental challenge in computational neuroscience.<n>We propose SynBrain, a generative framework that simulates the transformation from visual semantics to neural responses in a probabilistic and biologically interpretable manner.<n> Experimental results demonstrate that SynBrain surpasses state-of-the-art methods in subject-specific visual-to-fMRI encoding performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-14T03:01:05Z)
• NOBLE -- Neural Operator with Biologically-informed Latent Embeddings to Capture Experimental Variability in Biological Neuron Models [68.89389652724378]
  NOBLE is a neural operator framework that learns a mapping from a continuous frequency-modulated embedding of interpretable neuron features to the somatic voltage response induced by current injection.<n>It predicts distributions of neural dynamics accounting for the intrinsic experimental variability.<n>NOBLE is the first scaled-up deep learning framework validated on real experimental data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T01:01:18Z)
• Rethinking Functional Brain Connectome Analysis: Do Graph Deep Learning Models Help? [26.993152836226084]
  We re-examine graph deep learning models based on four large-scale neuroimaging studies.<n>We find that the message aggregation mechanism, a hallmark of graph deep learning models, does not help with predictive performance as typically assumed.<n>To address this issue, we propose a hybrid model combining a linear model with a graph attention network through dual pathways.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-28T07:24:16Z)
• Neural Dynamics Model of Visual Decision-Making: Learning from Human Experts [28.340344705437758]
  We implement a comprehensive visual decision-making model that spans from visual input to behavioral output. Our model aligns closely with human behavior and reflects neural activities in primates. A neuroimaging-informed fine-tuning approach was introduced and applied to the model, leading to performance improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-04T02:38:52Z)
• Neuroformer: Multimodal and Multitask Generative Pretraining for Brain Data [3.46029409929709]
  State-of-the-art systems neuroscience experiments yield large-scale multimodal data, and these data sets require new tools for analysis. Inspired by the success of large pretrained models in vision and language domains, we reframe the analysis of large-scale, cellular-resolution neuronal spiking data into an autoregressive generation problem. We first trained Neuroformer on simulated datasets, and found that it both accurately predicted intrinsically simulated neuronal circuit activity, and also inferred the underlying neural circuit connectivity, including direction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T20:17:32Z)
• Cross-Model Comparative Loss for Enhancing Neuronal Utility in Language Understanding [82.46024259137823]
  We propose a cross-model comparative loss for a broad range of tasks. We demonstrate the universal effectiveness of comparative loss through extensive experiments on 14 datasets from 3 distinct NLU tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-10T03:04:27Z)
• Neural Language Models are not Born Equal to Fit Brain Data, but Training Helps [75.84770193489639]
  We examine the impact of test loss, training corpus and model architecture on the prediction of functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging timecourses of participants listening to an audiobook. We find that untrained versions of each model already explain significant amount of signal in the brain by capturing similarity in brain responses across identical words. We suggest good practices for future studies aiming at explaining the human language system using neural language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-07T15:37:17Z)
• Simple and complex spiking neurons: perspectives and analysis in a simple STDP scenario [0.7829352305480283]
  Spiking neural networks (SNNs) are inspired by biology and neuroscience to create fast and efficient learning systems. This work considers various neuron models in the literature and then selects computational neuron models that are single-variable, efficient, and display different types of complexities. We make a comparative study of three simple I&F neuron models, namely the LIF, the Quadratic I&F (QIF) and the Exponential I&F (EIF), to understand whether the use of more complex models increases the performance of the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T10:01:51Z)
• Overcoming the Domain Gap in Neural Action Representations [60.47807856873544]
  3D pose data can now be reliably extracted from multi-view video sequences without manual intervention. We propose to use it to guide the encoding of neural action representations together with a set of neural and behavioral augmentations. To reduce the domain gap, during training, we swap neural and behavioral data across animals that seem to be performing similar actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-02T12:45:46Z)
• Overcoming the Domain Gap in Contrastive Learning of Neural Action Representations [60.47807856873544]
  A fundamental goal in neuroscience is to understand the relationship between neural activity and behavior. We generated a new multimodal dataset consisting of the spontaneous behaviors generated by fruit flies. This dataset and our new set of augmentations promise to accelerate the application of self-supervised learning methods in neuroscience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T15:27:51Z)
• The Neural Coding Framework for Learning Generative Models [91.0357317238509]
  We propose a novel neural generative model inspired by the theory of predictive processing in the brain. In a similar way, artificial neurons in our generative model predict what neighboring neurons will do, and adjust their parameters based on how well the predictions matched reality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-07T01:20:38Z)
• Learning identifiable and interpretable latent models of high-dimensional neural activity using pi-VAE [10.529943544385585]
  We propose a method that integrates key ingredients from latent models and traditional neural encoding models. Our method, pi-VAE, is inspired by recent progress on identifiable variational auto-encoder. We validate pi-VAE using synthetic data, and apply it to analyze neurophysiological datasets from rat hippocampus and macaque motor cortex.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-09T22:00:38Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.