Scaling Laws Revisited: Modeling the Role of Data Quality in Language Model Pretraining
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.03313v1
- Date: Tue, 30 Sep 2025 22:45:06 GMT
- Title: Scaling Laws Revisited: Modeling the Role of Data Quality in Language Model Pretraining
- Authors: Anirudh Subramanyam, Yuxin Chen, Robert L. Grossman,
- Abstract summary: We propose a quality-aware scaling law extending the Chinchilla framework to predict loss as a joint function of model size, data volume, and data quality.<n>We show that loss scales predictably with data quality and that higher-quality data can substantially reduce model size and hence compute requirements.
- Score: 13.89166201149496
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Scaling laws for language model training traditionally characterize how performance scales with model size and dataset volume. Prior work has explored architecture variants and data treatments such as dataset filtering and noise injection in language model pretraining; however, these studies have not formalized data quality within a principled scaling law. We introduce a dimensionless data-quality parameter Q, and propose a quality-aware scaling law extending the Chinchilla framework to predict loss as a joint function of model size, data volume, and data quality. The law is motivated by an effective-sample-size and information-theoretic view of noisy or redundant corpora, and it admits two practical estimators for Q: (i) a corruption rate proxy and (ii) a deficiency measure. Through synthetic experiments in neural machine translation and autoregressive modeling -- where we systematically control data quality via multiple levels of noise injection and coverage variation -- we show that loss scales predictably with data quality and that higher-quality data can substantially reduce model size and hence compute requirements. Our results demonstrate a sublinear decay of effective data with quality and robustness to moderate data corruption; out-of-sample evaluations further validate the predictive form of the law. Unlike prior empirical analyses, our work establishes an explicit, generalizable law for data quality, offering concrete guidance for balancing data curation effort and model scale in large-scale pretraining.
Related papers
- Model State Arithmetic for Machine Unlearning [43.773053236733425]
We propose a new algorithm, MSA, for estimating and undoing the influence of datapoints.<n>Our experimental results demonstrate that MSA consistently outperforms existing machine unlearning algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T02:16:16Z) - Dynamic Loss-Based Sample Reweighting for Improved Large Language Model Pretraining [55.262510814326035]
Existing reweighting strategies primarily focus on group-level data importance.<n>We introduce novel algorithms for dynamic, instance-level data reweighting.<n>Our framework allows us to devise reweighting strategies deprioritizing redundant or uninformative data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-10T17:57:15Z) - The interplay between domain specialization and model size [8.653321928148547]
We investigate the interplay between domain and model size during continued pretraining under compute-constrained scenarios.<n>Our goal is to identify an optimal training regime for this scenario and detect patterns in this interplay that can be generalized across different model sizes and domains.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-01-03T19:28:53Z) - A Conformal Approach to Feature-based Newsvendor under Model Misspecification [2.801095519296785]
We propose a model-free and distribution-free framework inspired by conformal prediction.<n>We validate our framework using both simulated data and a real-world dataset from the Capital Bikeshare program in Washington, D.C.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-17T18:34:43Z) - Optimizing Sequential Recommendation Models with Scaling Laws and Approximate Entropy [104.48511402784763]
Performance Law for SR models aims to theoretically investigate and model the relationship between model performance and data quality.<n>We propose Approximate Entropy (ApEn) to assess data quality, presenting a more nuanced approach compared to traditional data quantity metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-30T10:56:30Z) - Scaling Parameter-Constrained Language Models with Quality Data [32.35610029333478]
Scaling laws in language modeling traditionally quantify training loss as a function of dataset size and model parameters.
We extend the conventional understanding of scaling law by offering a microscopic view of data quality within the original formulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-04T02:07:17Z) - Impact of Noisy Supervision in Foundation Model Learning [91.56591923244943]
This paper is the first work to comprehensively understand and analyze the nature of noise in pre-training datasets.<n>We propose a tuning method (NMTune) to affine the feature space to mitigate the malignant effect of noise and improve generalization.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-11T16:22:41Z) - A Solvable Model of Neural Scaling Laws [72.8349503901712]
Large language models with a huge number of parameters, when trained on near internet-sized number of tokens, have been empirically shown to obey neural scaling laws.
We propose a statistical model -- a joint generative data model and random feature model -- that captures this neural scaling phenomenology.
Key findings are the manner in which the power laws that occur in the statistics of natural datasets are extended by nonlinear random feature maps.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-30T15:13:18Z) - Measuring Causal Effects of Data Statistics on Language Model's
`Factual' Predictions [59.284907093349425]
Large amounts of training data are one of the major reasons for the high performance of state-of-the-art NLP models.
We provide a language for describing how training data influences predictions, through a causal framework.
Our framework bypasses the need to retrain expensive models and allows us to estimate causal effects based on observational data alone.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-28T17:36:24Z) - Data Scaling Laws in NMT: The Effect of Noise and Architecture [59.767899982937756]
We study the effect of varying the architecture and training data quality on the data scaling properties of Neural Machine Translation (NMT)
We find that the data scaling exponents are minimally impacted, suggesting that marginally worse architectures or training data can be compensated for by adding more data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-04T06:53:49Z) - How Training Data Impacts Performance in Learning-based Control [67.7875109298865]
This paper derives an analytical relationship between the density of the training data and the control performance.
We formulate a quality measure for the data set, which we refer to as $rho$-gap.
We show how the $rho$-gap can be applied to a feedback linearizing control law.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-25T12:13:49Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.