A Neural Network Algorithm for KL Divergence Estimation with Quantitative Error Bounds
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.05386v1
- Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 21:25:13 GMT
- Title: A Neural Network Algorithm for KL Divergence Estimation with Quantitative Error Bounds
- Abstract summary: Estimating the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between random variables is a fundamental problem in statistical analysis.<n>We propose a KL divergence estimation algorithm using a shallow neural network with randomized hidden weights and biases.
- Score: 0.0
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Estimating the Kullback-Leibler (KL) divergence between random variables is a fundamental problem in statistical analysis. For continuous random variables, traditional information-theoretic estimators scale poorly with dimension and/or sample size. To mitigate this challenge, a variety of methods have been proposed to estimate KL divergences and related quantities, such as mutual information, using neural networks. The existing theoretical analyses show that neural network parameters achieving low error exist. However, since they rely on non-constructive neural network approximation theorems, they do not guarantee that the existing algorithms actually achieve low error. In this paper, we propose a KL divergence estimation algorithm using a shallow neural network with randomized hidden weights and biases (i.e. a random feature method). We show that with high probability, the algorithm achieves a KL divergence estimation error of $O(m^{-1/2}+T^{-1/3})$, where $m$ is the number of neurons and $T$ is both the number of steps of the algorithm and the number of samples.
Related papers
- Accuracy estimation of neural networks by extreme value theory [0.0]
It is not obvious how to quantify the error of the neural network, i.e., the remaining bias between the function and the neural network.<n>We propose the application of extreme value theory to quantify large values of the error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-01T10:52:51Z) - Dimension-independent learning rates for high-dimensional classification
problems [53.622581586464634]
We show that every $RBV2$ function can be approximated by a neural network with bounded weights.
We then prove the existence of a neural network with bounded weights approximating a classification function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T16:02:13Z) - Matching the Statistical Query Lower Bound for $k$-Sparse Parity Problems with Sign Stochastic Gradient Descent [83.85536329832722]
We solve the $k$-sparse parity problem with sign gradient descent (SGD) on two-layer fully-connected neural networks.<n>We show that this approach can efficiently solve the $k$-sparse parity problem on a $d$-dimensional hypercube.<n>We then demonstrate how a trained neural network with sign SGD can effectively approximate this good network, solving the $k$-parity problem with small statistical errors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T17:57:53Z) - Jensen-Shannon Divergence Based Novel Loss Functions for Bayesian Neural Networks [2.4554686192257424]
We formulate a novel loss function for BNNs based on a new modification to the generalized Jensen-Shannon (JS) divergence, which is bounded.<n>We find that the JS divergence-based variational inference is intractable, and hence employed a constrained optimization framework to formulate these losses.<n>Our theoretical analysis and empirical experiments on multiple regression and classification data sets suggest that the proposed losses perform better than the KL divergence-based loss, especially when the data sets are noisy or biased.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-23T01:47:09Z) - NUQ: Nonparametric Uncertainty Quantification for Deterministic Neural
Networks [151.03112356092575]
We show the principled way to measure the uncertainty of predictions for a classifier based on Nadaraya-Watson's nonparametric estimate of the conditional label distribution.
We demonstrate the strong performance of the method in uncertainty estimation tasks on a variety of real-world image datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-02-07T12:30:45Z) - Inverting brain grey matter models with likelihood-free inference: a
tool for trustable cytoarchitecture measurements [62.997667081978825]
characterisation of the brain grey matter cytoarchitecture with quantitative sensitivity to soma density and volume remains an unsolved challenge in dMRI.
We propose a new forward model, specifically a new system of equations, requiring a few relatively sparse b-shells.
We then apply modern tools from Bayesian analysis known as likelihood-free inference (LFI) to invert our proposed model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-11-15T09:08:27Z) - Neural Estimation of Statistical Divergences [24.78742908726579]
A modern method for estimating statistical divergences relies on parametrizing an empirical variational form by a neural network (NN)
In particular, there is a fundamental tradeoff between the two sources of error involved: approximation and empirical estimation.
We show that neural estimators with a slightly different NN growth-rate are near minimax rate-optimal, achieving the parametric convergence rate up to logarithmic factors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-10-07T17:42:44Z) - Near-Minimax Optimal Estimation With Shallow ReLU Neural Networks [19.216784367141972]
We study the problem of estimating an unknown function from noisy data using shallow (single-hidden layer) ReLU neural networks.
We quantify the performance of these neural network estimators when the data-generating function belongs to the space of functions of second-order bounded variation in the Radon domain.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-18T05:56:06Z) - The Separation Capacity of Random Neural Networks [78.25060223808936]
We show that a sufficiently large two-layer ReLU-network with standard Gaussian weights and uniformly distributed biases can solve this problem with high probability.
We quantify the relevant structure of the data in terms of a novel notion of mutual complexity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-07-31T10:25:26Z) - The Rate of Convergence of Variation-Constrained Deep Neural Networks [35.393855471751756]
We show that a class of variation-constrained neural networks can achieve near-parametric rate $n-1/2+delta$ for an arbitrarily small constant $delta$.
The result indicates that the neural function space needed for approximating smooth functions may not be as large as what is often perceived.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-22T21:28:00Z) - Understanding the Under-Coverage Bias in Uncertainty Estimation [58.03725169462616]
quantile regression tends to emphunder-cover than the desired coverage level in reality.
We prove that quantile regression suffers from an inherent under-coverage bias.
Our theory reveals that this under-coverage bias stems from a certain high-dimensional parameter estimation error.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-10T06:11:55Z) - Neural Thompson Sampling [94.82847209157494]
We propose a new algorithm, called Neural Thompson Sampling, which adapts deep neural networks for both exploration and exploitation.
At the core of our algorithm is a novel posterior distribution of the reward, where its mean is the neural network approximator, and its variance is built upon the neural tangent features of the corresponding neural network.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-10-02T07:44:09Z) - CRAUM-Net: Contextual Recursive Attention with Uncertainty Modeling for Salient Object Detection [0.0]
We present a novel framework that integrates multi-scale context aggregation, advanced attention mechanisms, and an uncertainty-aware module for improved SOD performance.<n>Our Adaptive Cross-Scale Context Module effectively fuses features from multiple levels, leveraging Recursive Channel Spatial Attention and Convolutional Block Attention.<n>To train our network robustly, we employ a combination of boundary-sensitive and topology-preserving loss functions, including Boundary IoU, Focal Tversky, and Topological Saliency losses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-06-04T18:33:59Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.