Taxonomy of User Needs and Actions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06124v2
• Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 16:13:43 GMT
• Title: Taxonomy of User Needs and Actions
• Authors: Renee Shelby, Fernando Diaz, Vinodkumar Prabhakaran,
• Abstract summary: The growing ubiquity of conversational AI highlights the need for frameworks that capture users' instrumental goals and the situated, adaptive, and social practices through which they achieve them.<n>To address this gap, we introduce the Taxonomy of User Needs and Actions (TUNA), an empirically grounded framework developed through iterative qualitative analysis of 1193 human-AI conversations.<n> TUNA organizes user actions into a three-level hierarchy encompassing behaviors associated with information seeking, synthesis, procedural guidance, content creation, social interaction, and meta-conversation.
• Score: 51.86289485979439
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The growing ubiquity of conversational AI highlights the need for frameworks that capture not only users' instrumental goals but also the situated, adaptive, and social practices through which they achieve them. Existing taxonomies of conversational behavior either overgeneralize, remain domain-specific, or reduce interactions to narrow dialogue functions. To address this gap, we introduce the Taxonomy of User Needs and Actions (TUNA), an empirically grounded framework developed through iterative qualitative analysis of 1193 human-AI conversations, supplemented by theoretical review and validation across diverse contexts. TUNA organizes user actions into a three-level hierarchy encompassing behaviors associated with information seeking, synthesis, procedural guidance, content creation, social interaction, and meta-conversation. By centering user agency and appropriation practices, TUNA enables multi-scale evaluation, supports policy harmonization across products, and provides a backbone for layering domain-specific taxonomies. This work contributes a systematic vocabulary for describing AI use, advancing both scholarly understanding and practical design of safer, more responsive, and more accountable conversational systems.

Related papers

• Decoding Psychological States Through Movement: Inferring Human Kinesic Functions with Application to Built Environments [1.433758865948252]
  We introduce the Dyadic User Engagement DataseT dataset and an embedded kinesics recognition framework.<n>DUET captures 12 dyadic interactions spanning all five kinesic functions-emblems, illustrators, affect displays, adaptors, and regulators-across four sensing modalities and three built-environment contexts.<n>Our recognition framework infers communicative function directly from privacy-preserving skeletal motion without handcrafted action-to-function dictionaries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-23T21:50:06Z)
• Conversational Alignment with Artificial Intelligence in Context [0.0]
  This article explores what it means for AI agents to be conversationally aligned to human communicative norms and practices.<n>We suggest that current large language model (LLM) architectures, constraints, and affordances may impose fundamental limitations on achieving full conversational alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T22:14:34Z)
• A Desideratum for Conversational Agents: Capabilities, Challenges, and Future Directions [51.96890647837277]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have propelled conversational AI from traditional dialogue systems into sophisticated agents capable of autonomous actions, contextual awareness, and multi-turn interactions with users.<n>This survey paper presents a desideratum for next-generation Conversational Agents - what has been achieved, what challenges persist, and what must be done for more scalable systems that approach human-level intelligence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T21:01:25Z)
• Revisiting Conversation Discourse for Dialogue Disentanglement [88.3386821205896]
  We propose enhancing dialogue disentanglement by taking full advantage of the dialogue discourse characteristics. We develop a structure-aware framework to integrate the rich structural features for better modeling the conversational semantic context. Our work has great potential to facilitate broader multi-party multi-thread dialogue applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T19:17:47Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• Semantic Interactive Learning for Text Classification: A Constructive Approach for Contextual Interactions [0.0]
  We propose a novel interaction framework called Semantic Interactive Learning for the text domain. We frame the problem of incorporating constructive and contextual feedback into the learner as a task to find an architecture that enables more semantic alignment between humans and machines. We introduce a technique called SemanticPush that is effective for translating conceptual corrections of humans to non-extrapolating training examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T08:13:45Z)
• User Satisfaction Estimation with Sequential Dialogue Act Modeling in Goal-oriented Conversational Systems [65.88679683468143]
  We propose a novel framework, namely USDA, to incorporate the sequential dynamics of dialogue acts for predicting user satisfaction. USDA incorporates the sequential transitions of both content and act features in the dialogue to predict the user satisfaction. Experimental results on four benchmark goal-oriented dialogue datasets show that the proposed method substantially and consistently outperforms existing methods on USE.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-07T02:50:07Z)
• Conversational Recommendation: Theoretical Model and Complexity Analysis [6.084774669743511]
  We present a theoretical, domain-independent model of conversational recommendation. We show that finding an efficient conversational strategy is NP-hard. We also show that catalog characteristics can strongly influence the efficiency of individual conversational strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-10T09:05:52Z)
• Detecting and Classifying Malevolent Dialogue Responses: Taxonomy, Data and Methodology [68.8836704199096]
  Corpus-based conversational interfaces are able to generate more diverse and natural responses than template-based or retrieval-based agents. With their increased generative capacity of corpusbased conversational agents comes the need to classify and filter out malevolent responses. Previous studies on the topic of recognizing and classifying inappropriate content are mostly focused on a certain category of malevolence.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-21T22:43:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.