Exploring Human-AI Collaboration Using Mental Models of Early Adopters of Multi-Agent Generative AI Tools
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06224v1
- Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2025 05:35:38 GMT
- Title: Exploring Human-AI Collaboration Using Mental Models of Early Adopters of Multi-Agent Generative AI Tools
- Authors: Suchismita Naik, Austin L. Toombs, Amanda Snellinger, Scott Saponas, Amanda K. Hall,
- Abstract summary: We investigated how early adopters and developers conceptualize multi-agent Gen AI tools.<n>We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 developers, all early adopters of multi-agent Gen AI technology who work at Microsoft.<n>We identified key challenges, including error propagation, unpredictable and unproductive agent loop behavior, and the need for clear communication to mitigate the layered transparency issues.
- Score: 4.382163871275696
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: With recent advancements in multi-agent generative AI (Gen AI), technology organizations like Microsoft are adopting these complex tools, redefining AI agents as active collaborators in complex workflows rather than as passive tools. In this study, we investigated how early adopters and developers conceptualize multi-agent Gen AI tools, focusing on how they understand human-AI collaboration mechanisms, general collaboration dynamics, and transparency in the context of AI tools. We conducted semi-structured interviews with 13 developers, all early adopters of multi-agent Gen AI technology who work at Microsoft. Our findings revealed that these early adopters conceptualize multi-agent systems as "teams" of specialized role-based and task-based agents, such as assistants or reviewers, structured similar to human collaboration models and ranging from AI-dominant to AI-assisted, user-controlled interactions. We identified key challenges, including error propagation, unpredictable and unproductive agent loop behavior, and the need for clear communication to mitigate the layered transparency issues. Early adopters' perspectives about the role of transparency underscored its importance as a way to build trust, verify and trace errors, and prevent misuse, errors, and leaks. The insights and design considerations we present contribute to CSCW research about collaborative mechanisms with capabilities ranging from AI-dominant to AI-assisted interactions, transparency and oversight strategies in human-agent and agent-agent interactions, and how humans make sense of these multi-agent systems as dynamic, role-diverse collaborators which are customizable for diverse needs and workflows. We conclude with future research directions that extend CSCW approaches to the design of inter-agent and human mediation interactions.
Related papers
- Agentsway -- Software Development Methodology for AI Agents-based Teams [4.226647687395254]
"Agentsway" is a novel software development framework designed for ecosystems where AI agents operate as first-class collaborators.<n>The framework defines distinct roles for planning, prompting, coding, testing, and fine-tuning agents.<n>Agentsway represents a foundational step toward the next generation of AI-native, self-improving software development methodologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-26T11:58:42Z) - A Survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models [84.18778056010629]
We present a comprehensive survey on Agentic Multimodal Large Language Models (Agentic MLLMs)<n>We explore the emerging paradigm of agentic MLLMs, delineating their conceptual foundations and distinguishing characteristics from conventional MLLM-based agents.<n>To further accelerate research in this area for the community, we compile open-source training frameworks, training and evaluation datasets for developing agentic MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-13T04:07:01Z) - Agentic AI Frameworks: Architectures, Protocols, and Design Challenges [0.0]
Large Language Models have ushered in a transformative paradigm in artificial intelligence, where intelligent agents exhibit goal-directed autonomy, contextual reasoning, and dynamic multi-agent coordination.<n>This paper provides a systematic review and comparative analysis of leading Agentic AI frameworks, including CrewAI, LangGraph, AutoGen, Semantic Kernel, Agno, Google ADK, and MetaGPT.<n>We identify key limitations, emerging trends, and open challenges in the field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-13T19:16:18Z) - A Comprehensive Survey of Self-Evolving AI Agents: A New Paradigm Bridging Foundation Models and Lifelong Agentic Systems [53.37728204835912]
Most existing AI systems rely on manually crafted configurations that remain static after deployment.<n>Recent research has explored agent evolution techniques that aim to automatically enhance agent systems based on interaction data and environmental feedback.<n>This survey aims to provide researchers and practitioners with a systematic understanding of self-evolving AI agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-08-10T16:07:32Z) - Agentic Web: Weaving the Next Web with AI Agents [109.13815627467514]
The emergence of AI agents powered by large language models (LLMs) marks a pivotal shift toward the Agentic Web.<n>In this paradigm, agents interact directly with one another to plan, coordinate, and execute complex tasks on behalf of users.<n>We present a structured framework for understanding and building the Agentic Web.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-28T17:58:12Z) - Agentic AI in Product Management: A Co-Evolutionary Model [0.0]
This study explores agentic AI's transformative role in product management.<n>It proposes a conceptual co-evolutionary framework to guide its integration across the product lifecycle.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-01T02:32:32Z) - AI Agents vs. Agentic AI: A Conceptual Taxonomy, Applications and Challenges [3.7414278978078204]
This review critically distinguishes between AI Agents and Agentic AI, offering a structured, conceptual taxonomy, application mapping, and analysis of opportunities and challenges to clarify their divergent design philosophies and capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-15T16:21:33Z) - Internet of Agents: Fundamentals, Applications, and Challenges [68.9543153075464]
We introduce the Internet of Agents (IoA) as a foundational framework that enables seamless interconnection, dynamic discovery, and collaborative orchestration among heterogeneous agents at scale.<n>We analyze the key operational enablers of IoA, including capability notification and discovery, adaptive communication protocols, dynamic task matching, consensus and conflict-resolution mechanisms, and incentive models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-12T02:04:37Z) - Internet of Agents: Weaving a Web of Heterogeneous Agents for Collaborative Intelligence [79.5316642687565]
Existing multi-agent frameworks often struggle with integrating diverse capable third-party agents.
We propose the Internet of Agents (IoA), a novel framework that addresses these limitations.
IoA introduces an agent integration protocol, an instant-messaging-like architecture design, and dynamic mechanisms for agent teaming and conversation flow control.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T17:33:24Z) - Position Paper: Agent AI Towards a Holistic Intelligence [53.35971598180146]
We emphasize developing Agent AI -- an embodied system that integrates large foundation models into agent actions.
In this paper, we propose a novel large action model to achieve embodied intelligent behavior, the Agent Foundation Model.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-28T16:09:56Z) - ProAgent: Building Proactive Cooperative Agents with Large Language
Models [89.53040828210945]
ProAgent is a novel framework that harnesses large language models to create proactive agents.
ProAgent can analyze the present state, and infer the intentions of teammates from observations.
ProAgent exhibits a high degree of modularity and interpretability, making it easily integrated into various coordination scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-22T10:36:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.