SID: Multi-LLM Debate Driven by Self Signals

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.06843v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 10:10:11 GMT
• Title: SID: Multi-LLM Debate Driven by Self Signals
• Authors: Xuhang Chen, Zhifan Song, Deyi Ji, Shuo Gao, Lanyun Zhu,
• Abstract summary: Self-Signals Driven Multi-LLM Debate (SID)<n>We introduce a Self-Signals Driven Multi-LLM Debate (SID)<n>Our approach enables high-confidence agents to exit early at the model level and compress the redundant debate contents based on the attention mechanism.
• Score: 17.45752619450614
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive capabilities across diverse application domains. Recent work has explored Multi-LLM Agent Debate (MAD) as a way to enhance performance by enabling multiple LLMs to discuss and refine responses iteratively. Nevertheless, existing MAD methods predominantly focus on utilizing external structures, such as debate graphs, using LLM-as-a-Judge, while neglecting the application of self signals, such as token logits and attention, that arise during generation. This omission leads to redundant computation and potential performance degradation. In this paper, we shift the focus to the self signals of multi-LLM debate and introduce a Self-Signals Driven Multi-LLM Debate (SID), which leverages two types of self-signals: model-level confidence and token-level semantic focus, to adaptively guide the debate process. Our approach enables high-confidence agents to exit early at the model level and compress the redundant debate contents based on the attention mechanism. We evaluate our method on various LLMs and Multimodal LLMs across multiple challenging benchmarks. Experimental results demonstrate that our method not only outperforms existing MAD techniques in accuracy but also reduces token consumption, highlighting the effectiveness of utilizing self signals in enhancing both the performance and efficiency of multi-agent debate systems. Our code will be available at~\href{https://github.com/xuhang2019/SID}{\texttt{https://github.com/xuhang2019/SID}}.

Related papers

• Prepare Reasoning Language Models for Multi-Agent Debate with Self-Debate Reinforcement Learning [49.99694105650486]
  Self-Debate Reinforcement Learning (SDRL) is a training framework that equips a single large language model with strong problem-solving ability.<n>We show that SDRL improves overall Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) performance while simultaneously strengthening single model reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-29T20:21:44Z)
• A Comprehensive Study on Visual Token Redundancy for Discrete Diffusion-based Multimodal Large Language Models [85.30893355216486]
  We study how visual token redundancy evolves with different dMLLM architectures and tasks.<n>Our study reveals that visual redundancy emerges only in from-scratch dMLLMs while handling long-answer tasks.<n>Layer-skipping is promising for accelerating AR-to-diffusion dMLLMs, whereas progressive or late-step pruning is more effective for from-scratch dMLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T04:13:36Z)
• MADIAVE: Multi-Agent Debate for Implicit Attribute Value Extraction [52.89860691282002]
  Implicit Attribute Value Extraction (AVE) is essential for accurately representing products in e-commerce.<n>Despite advances in multimodal large language models (MLLMs), implicit AVE remains challenging due to the complexity of multidimensional data.<n>We introduce textscmodelname, a multi-agent debate framework that employs multiple MLLM agents to iteratively refine inferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-07T06:27:42Z)
• PUMA: Layer-Pruned Language Model for Efficient Unified Multimodal Retrieval with Modality-Adaptive Learning [54.73049408950049]
  We propose a Layer-Pruned Language Model for Efficient Unified Multimodal Retrieval with Modality-Adaptive Learning.<n>Our approach improves unified multimodal retrieval from both structural and learning perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-10T16:47:25Z)
• CortexDebate: Debating Sparsely and Equally for Multi-Agent Debate [11.155092859033784]
  Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) has emerged as an effective strategy to mitigate issues with single Large Language Model (LLM)<n>Existing MAD methods face two major issues: (a) too lengthy input contexts, which causes LLM agents to get lost in plenty of input information and experiences performance drop; and (b) the overconfidence dilemma, where self-assured LLM agents dominate the debate, leading to low debating effectiveness.<n>We propose a novel MAD method called "CortexDebate", inspired by the human brain's tendency to establish a sparse and dynamically optimized network among cortical areas governed by white matter.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-05T07:23:15Z)
• Prompt Highlighter: Interactive Control for Multi-Modal LLMs [50.830448437285355]
  This study targets a critical aspect of multi-modal LLMs' (LLMs&VLMs) inference: explicit controllable text generation. We introduce a novel inference method, Prompt Highlighter, which enables users to highlight specific prompt spans to interactively control the focus during generation. We find that, during inference, guiding the models with highlighted tokens through the attention weights leads to more desired outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-07T13:53:29Z)
• Should we be going MAD? A Look at Multi-Agent Debate Strategies for LLMs [7.7433783185451075]
  We benchmark a range of debating and prompting strategies to explore the trade-offs between cost, time, and accuracy. We find that multi-agent debating systems, in their current form, do not reliably outperform other proposed prompting strategies. We build on these results to offer insights into improving debating strategies, such as adjusting agent agreement levels.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T05:54:41Z)
• Encouraging Divergent Thinking in Large Language Models through Multi-Agent Debate [85.3444184685235]
  We propose a Multi-Agent Debate (MAD) framework, in which multiple agents express their arguments in the state of "tit for tat" and a judge manages the debate process to obtain a final solution. Our framework encourages divergent thinking in LLMs which would be helpful for tasks that require deep levels of contemplation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T15:25:45Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.