A Unified Multi-Task Learning Framework for Generative Auto-Bidding with Validation-Aligned Optimization
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.07760v1
- Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 03:59:51 GMT
- Title: A Unified Multi-Task Learning Framework for Generative Auto-Bidding with Validation-Aligned Optimization
- Authors: Yiqin Lv, Zhiyu Mou, Miao Xu, Jinghao Chen, Qi Wang, Yixiu Mao, Yun Qu, Rongquan Bai, Chuan Yu, Jian Xu, Bo Zheng, Xiangyang Ji,
- Abstract summary: Multi-task learning offers a principled framework to train these tasks jointly through shared representations.<n>Existing multi-task optimization strategies are primarily guided by training dynamics and often generalize poorly in volatile bidding environments.<n>We present Validation-Aligned Multi-task Optimization (VAMO), which adaptively assigns task weights based on the alignment between per-task training gradients and a held-out validation gradient.
- Score: 51.27959658504722
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: In online advertising, heterogeneous advertiser requirements give rise to numerous customized bidding tasks that are typically optimized independently, resulting in extensive computation and limited data efficiency. Multi-task learning offers a principled framework to train these tasks jointly through shared representations. However, existing multi-task optimization strategies are primarily guided by training dynamics and often generalize poorly in volatile bidding environments. To this end, we present Validation-Aligned Multi-task Optimization (VAMO), which adaptively assigns task weights based on the alignment between per-task training gradients and a held-out validation gradient, thereby steering updates toward validation improvement and better matching deployment objectives. We further equip the framework with a periodicity-aware temporal module and couple it with an advanced generative auto-bidding backbone to enhance cross-task transfer of seasonal structure and strengthen bidding performance. Meanwhile, we provide theoretical insights into the proposed method, e.g., convergence guarantee and alignment analysis. Extensive experiments on both simulated and large-scale real-world advertising systems consistently demonstrate significant improvements over typical baselines, illuminating the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Related papers
- Teaching RL Agents to Act Better: VLM as Action Advisor for Online Reinforcement Learning [5.025037011107095]
Vision-language action (VLA) policies represent a promising direction for solving diverse tasks.<n>We propose textbf VARL (textbfVLM as textbfAction advisor for online textbfReinforcement textbfL), a framework that leverages the domain knowledge of vision-language models (VLMs) to provide action suggestions for reinforcement learning agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-09-25T13:16:34Z) - Preference-based Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning [5.031225669460861]
This paper introduces preference-based MORL (Pb-MORL), which formalizes the integration of preferences into the MORL framework.<n>To guide policy optimization using preferences, our method constructs a multi-objective reward model that aligns with the given preferences.<n>Experiments in benchmark multi-objective tasks, a multi-energy management task, and an autonomous driving task on a multi-line highway show that our method performs competitively.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-18T16:43:04Z) - Bridging Offline and Online Reinforcement Learning for LLMs [71.48552761763158]
We investigate the effectiveness of reinforcement learning methods for finetuning large language models when transitioning from offline to semi-online.<n>Our experiments cover training on verifiable math as well as non-verifiable instruction following with a set of benchmark evaluations for both.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-26T17:25:49Z) - Towards Unified Modeling in Federated Multi-Task Learning via Subspace Decoupling [23.642760378344335]
Federated Multi-Task Learning (FMTL) enables multiple clients performing heterogeneous tasks without exchanging their local data.<n>Most existing FMTL methods focus on building personalized models for each client and unable to support the aggregation of multiple heterogeneous tasks into a unified model.<n>We propose FedDEA, an update-structure-aware aggregation method specifically designed for multi-task model integration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-30T03:53:21Z) - On the Role of Feedback in Test-Time Scaling of Agentic AI Workflows [71.92083784393418]
Agentic AI (systems that autonomously plan and act) are becoming widespread, yet their task success rate on complex tasks remains low.<n>Inference-time alignment relies on three components: sampling, evaluation, and feedback.<n>We introduce Iterative Agent Decoding (IAD), a procedure that repeatedly inserts feedback extracted from different forms of critiques.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-02T17:40:47Z) - Multi Activity Sequence Alignment via Implicit Clustering [50.3168866743067]
We propose a novel framework that overcomes limitations using sequence alignment via implicit clustering.<n>Specifically, our key idea is to perform implicit clip-level clustering while aligning frames in sequences.<n>Our experiments show that our proposed method outperforms state-of-the-art results.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-03-16T14:28:46Z) - Towards more Contextual Agents: An extractor-Generator Optimization Framework [0.0]
Large Language Model (LLM)-based agents have demonstrated remarkable success in solving complex tasks across a wide range of general-purpose applications.<n>However, their performance often degrades in context-specific scenarios, such as specialized industries or research domains.<n>To address this challenge, our work introduces a systematic approach to enhance the contextual adaptability of LLM-based agents.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-18T15:07:06Z) - M$^2$PT: Multimodal Prompt Tuning for Zero-shot Instruction Learning [90.75075886543404]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) demonstrate remarkable performance across a wide range of domains.
In this work, we introduce a novel Multimodal Prompt Tuning (M$2$PT) approach for efficient instruction tuning of MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-24T01:40:24Z) - T-REX: Mixture-of-Rank-One-Experts with Semantic-aware Intuition for Multi-task Large Language Model Finetuning [31.276142111455847]
Large language models (LLMs) encounter significant adaptation challenges in diverse multitask finetuning.<n>We design a novel framework, mixunderlinetextbfTureunderlinetextbf-of-underlinetextbfRank-onunderlinetextbfE-eunderlinetextbfXper ts (textttT-REX)<n>Rank-1 experts enable a mix-and-match mechanism to quadratically expand the vector subspace of experts with linear parameter overheads, achieving approximate error reduction with optimal
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-13T12:14:58Z) - Effective Adaptation in Multi-Task Co-Training for Unified Autonomous
Driving [103.745551954983]
In this paper, we investigate the transfer performance of various types of self-supervised methods, including MoCo and SimCLR, on three downstream tasks.
We find that their performances are sub-optimal or even lag far behind the single-task baseline.
We propose a simple yet effective pretrain-adapt-finetune paradigm for general multi-task training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-09-19T12:15:31Z) - In Defense of the Unitary Scalarization for Deep Multi-Task Learning [121.76421174107463]
We present a theoretical analysis suggesting that many specialized multi-tasks can be interpreted as forms of regularization.
We show that, when coupled with standard regularization and stabilization techniques, unitary scalarization matches or improves upon the performance of complex multitasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-11T18:44:17Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.