Pattern or Not? QAOA Parameter Heuristics and Potentials of Parsimony

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08153v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 12:35:30 GMT
• Title: Pattern or Not? QAOA Parameter Heuristics and Potentials of Parsimony
• Authors: Vincent Eichenseher, Maja Franz, Christian Wolff, Wolfgang Mauerer,
• Abstract summary: Structured variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) have emerged as leading candidates for exploiting advantages of near-term quantum hardware.<n>We systematically investigate the role of classical parameters in QAOA performance through extensive numerical simulations.<n>Our results demonstrate that: (i) optimal parameters often deviate substantially from expected patterns; (ii) QAOA performance becomes progressively less sensitive to specific parameter choices as depth increases; and (iii) iterative component-wise fixing performs on par with, and at shallow depth may even outperform, several established parameter-selection strategies.
• Score: 3.230880354632914
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Structured variational quantum algorithms such as the Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) have emerged as leading candidates for exploiting advantages of near-term quantum hardware. They interlace classical computation, in particular optimisation of variational parameters, with quantum-specific routines, and combine problem-specific advantages -- sometimes even provable -- with adaptability to the constraints of noisy, intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) devices. While circuit depth can be parametrically increased and is known to improve performance in an ideal (noiseless) setting, on realistic hardware greater depth exacerbates noise: The overall quality of results depends critically on both, variational parameters and circuit depth. Although identifying optimal parameters is NP-hard, prior work has suggested that they may exhibit regular, predictable patterns for increasingly deep circuits and depending on the studied class of problems. In this work, we systematically investigate the role of classical parameters in QAOA performance through extensive numerical simulations and suggest a simple, yet effective heuristic scheme to find good parameters for low-depth circuits. Our results demonstrate that: (i) optimal parameters often deviate substantially from expected patterns; (ii) QAOA performance becomes progressively less sensitive to specific parameter choices as depth increases; and (iii) iterative component-wise fixing performs on par with, and at shallow depth may even outperform, several established parameter-selection strategies. We identify conditions under which structured parameter patterns emerge, and when deviations from the patterns warrant further consideration. These insights for low-depth circuits may inform more robust pathways to harnessing QAOA in realistic quantum compute scenarios.

Related papers

• Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm with Fixed Number of Parameters [0.0]
  We introduce a novel quantum optimization paradigm: the Fixed--Count Approximate Quantum Optimization Algorithm (FPC-QAOA)<n>It is a scalable variational framework that maintains a constant number of trainable parameters regardless of the number of qubits, Hamiltonian complexity, or circuit depth.<n>We benchmark FPC-QAOA on random MaxCut instances and the Tail Assignment Problem, achieving performance comparable to or better than standard QAOA.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T14:02:31Z)
• Quantum Optimization with Classical Chaos [0.0]
  Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm (QAOA) is a powerful tool in solving various problems such as Maximum Satisfiability and Maximum Cut.<n>Hard computational problems, however, require deep circuits that place high demands on classical variational parameter optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-01T18:02:46Z)
• Transferring linearly fixed QAOA angles: performance and real device results [0.0]
  We investigate a simplified approach that combines linear parameterization with parameter transferring, reducing the parameter space to just 4 dimensions regardless of the number of layers.<n>We compare this combined approach with standard QAOA and other parameter setting strategies such as INTERP and FOURIER, which require computationally demanding incremental layer-by-layer optimization.<n>Our experiments extend from classical simulation to actual quantum hardware implementation on IBM's Eagle processor, demonstrating the approach's viability on current NISQ devices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-17T04:17:51Z)
• Optuna vs Code Llama: Are LLMs a New Paradigm for Hyperparameter Tuning? [45.58422897857411]
  This work explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for hyperparameter optimization by fine-tuning a parameter-efficient version of Code Llama using LoRA.<n>Our approach achieves competitive or superior Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) while substantially reducing computational overhead.<n>Results demonstrate that LLM-based optimization not only rivals established Bayesian methods like Tree-structured Parzen Estimators (TPE) but also accelerates tuning for real-world applications requiring perceptual quality and low-latency processing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T13:15:47Z)
• Characterizing randomness in parameterized quantum circuits through expressibility and average entanglement [39.58317527488534]
  Quantum Circuits (PQCs) are still not fully understood outside the scope of their principal application.<n>We analyse the generation of random states in PQCs under restrictions on the qubits connectivities.<n>We place a connection between how steep is the increase on the uniformity of the distribution of the generated states and the generation of entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T17:32:55Z)
• Bayesian Parameterized Quantum Circuit Optimization (BPQCO): A task and hardware-dependent approach [49.89480853499917]
  Variational quantum algorithms (VQA) have emerged as a promising quantum alternative for solving optimization and machine learning problems. In this paper, we experimentally demonstrate the influence of the circuit design on the performance obtained for two classification problems. We also study the degradation of the obtained circuits in the presence of noise when simulating real quantum computers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-17T11:00:12Z)
• Analyzing Prospects for Quantum Advantage in Topological Data Analysis [35.423446067065576]
  We analyze and optimize an improved quantum algorithm for topological data analysis. We show that super-quadratic quantum speedups are only possible when targeting a multiplicative error approximation. We argue that quantum circuits with tens of billions of Toffoli can solve seemingly classically intractable instances.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T17:56:15Z)
• Parameters Fixing Strategy for Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm [0.0]
  We propose a strategy to give high approximation ratio on average, even at large circuit depths, by initializing QAOA with the optimal parameters obtained from the previous depths. We test our strategy on the Max-cut problem of certain classes of graphs such as the 3-regular graphs and the Erd"os-R'enyi graphs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-11T15:44:16Z)
• FLIP: A flexible initializer for arbitrarily-sized parametrized quantum circuits [105.54048699217668]
  We propose a FLexible Initializer for arbitrarily-sized Parametrized quantum circuits. FLIP can be applied to any family of PQCs, and instead of relying on a generic set of initial parameters, it is tailored to learn the structure of successful parameters. We illustrate the advantage of using FLIP in three scenarios: a family of problems with proven barren plateaus, PQC training to solve max-cut problem instances, and PQC training for finding the ground state energies of 1D Fermi-Hubbard models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-15T17:38:33Z)
• Adaptive pruning-based optimization of parameterized quantum circuits [62.997667081978825]
  Variisy hybrid quantum-classical algorithms are powerful tools to maximize the use of Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum devices. We propose a strategy for such ansatze used in variational quantum algorithms, which we call "Efficient Circuit Training" (PECT) Instead of optimizing all of the ansatz parameters at once, PECT launches a sequence of variational algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-01T18:14:11Z)
• An Asymptotically Optimal Multi-Armed Bandit Algorithm and Hyperparameter Optimization [48.5614138038673]
  We propose an efficient and robust bandit-based algorithm called Sub-Sampling (SS) in the scenario of hyper parameter search evaluation. We also develop a novel hyper parameter optimization algorithm called BOSS. Empirical studies validate our theoretical arguments of SS and demonstrate the superior performance of BOSS on a number of applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-11T03:15:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.