The Digital Mirror: Gender Bias and Occupational Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08628v1
• Date: Wed, 08 Oct 2025 12:49:18 GMT
• Title: The Digital Mirror: Gender Bias and Occupational Stereotypes in AI-Generated Images
• Authors: Siiri Leppälampi, Sonja M. Hyrynsalmi, Erno Vanhala,
• Abstract summary: This study tests representation biases in AI-generated pictures in an occupational setting.<n>We evaluate how two AI image generator tools, DALL-E 3 and Ideogram, compare.<n>We propose suggestions for practitioners, individuals and researchers to increase representation when generating images with visible genders.
• Score: 2.198430261120653
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Generative AI offers vast opportunities for creating visualisations, such as graphics, videos, and images. However, recent studies around AI-generated visualisations have primarily focused on the creation process and image quality, overlooking representational biases. This study addresses this gap by testing representation biases in AI-generated pictures in an occupational setting and evaluating how two AI image generator tools, DALL-E 3 and Ideogram, compare. Additionally, the study discusses topics such as ageing and emotions in AI-generated images. As AI image tools are becoming more widely used, addressing and mitigating harmful gender biases becomes essential to ensure diverse representation in media and professional settings. In this study, over 750 AI-generated images of occupations were prompted. The thematic analysis results revealed that both DALL-E 3 and Ideogram reinforce traditional gender stereotypes in AI-generated images, although to varying degrees. These findings emphasise that AI visualisation tools risk reinforcing narrow representations. In our discussion section, we propose suggestions for practitioners, individuals and researchers to increase representation when generating images with visible genders.

Related papers

• Quality Assessment and Distortion-aware Saliency Prediction for AI-Generated Omnidirectional Images [70.49595920462579]
  This work studies the quality assessment and distortion-aware saliency prediction problems for AIGODIs.<n>We propose two models with shared encoders based on the BLIP-2 model to evaluate the human visual experience and predict distortion-aware saliency for AI-generated omnidirectional images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T05:36:04Z)
• Using complex prompts to identify fine-grained biases in image generation through ChatGPT-4o [0.0]
  Two dimensions of bias can be revealed through the study of large AI models.<n>Not only bias in training data or the products of an AI, but also bias in society.<n>I briefly discuss how we can use complex prompts to image generation AI to investigate either dimension of bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T03:17:35Z)
• AI-generated Image Quality Assessment in Visual Communication [72.11144790293086]
  AIGI-VC is a quality assessment database for AI-generated images in visual communication.<n>The dataset consists of 2,500 images spanning 14 advertisement topics and 8 emotion types.<n>It provides coarse-grained human preference annotations and fine-grained preference descriptions, benchmarking the abilities of IQA methods in preference prediction, interpretation, and reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-20T08:47:07Z)
• Visual Verity in AI-Generated Imagery: Computational Metrics and Human-Centric Analysis [0.0]
  We introduce and validated a questionnaire called Visual Verity, which measures photorealism, image quality, and text-image alignment. We also analyzed statistical properties, finding that camera-generated images scored lower in hue, saturation, and brightness. Our findings highlight the need for refining computational metrics to better capture human visual perception.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-22T23:29:07Z)
• She Works, He Works: A Curious Exploration of Gender Bias in AI-Generated Imagery [0.0]
  This paper examines gender bias in AI-generated imagery of construction workers, highlighting discrepancies in the portrayal of male and female figures. Grounded in Griselda Pollock's theories on visual culture and gender, the analysis reveals that AI models tend to sexualize female figures while portraying male figures as more authoritative and competent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T05:56:18Z)
• A Sanity Check for AI-generated Image Detection [49.08585395873425]
  We propose AIDE (AI-generated Image DEtector with Hybrid Features) to detect AI-generated images.<n>AIDE achieves +3.5% and +4.6% improvements to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T17:59:49Z)
• Disability Representations: Finding Biases in Automatic Image Generation [0.0]
  This study investigates the representation biases in popular image generation models towards people with disabilities (PWD) The results indicate a significant bias, with most generated images portraying disabled individuals as old, sad, and predominantly using manual wheelchairs. These findings highlight the urgent need for more inclusive AI development, ensuring diverse and accurate representation of PWD in generated images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T09:12:31Z)
• The Adversarial AI-Art: Understanding, Generation, Detection, and Benchmarking [47.08666835021915]
  We present a systematic attempt at understanding and detecting AI-generated images (AI-art) in adversarial scenarios. The dataset, named ARIA, contains over 140K images in five categories: artworks (painting), social media images, news photos, disaster scenes, and anime pictures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-22T21:00:13Z)
• Bias in Generative AI [2.5830293457323266]
  This study analyzed images generated by three popular generative artificial intelligence (AI) tools to investigate potential bias in AI generators. All three AI generators exhibited bias against women and African Americans. Women were depicted as younger with more smiles and happiness, while men were depicted as older with more neutral expressions and anger.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T07:34:41Z)
• Invisible Relevance Bias: Text-Image Retrieval Models Prefer AI-Generated Images [67.18010640829682]
  We show that AI-generated images introduce an invisible relevance bias to text-image retrieval models. The inclusion of AI-generated images in the training data of the retrieval models exacerbates the invisible relevance bias. We propose an effective training method aimed at alleviating the invisible relevance bias.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-23T16:22:58Z)
• Seeing is not always believing: Benchmarking Human and Model Perception of AI-Generated Images [66.20578637253831]
  There is a growing concern that the advancement of artificial intelligence (AI) technology may produce fake photos. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate agents for distinguishing state-of-the-art AI-generated visual content.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T17:51:59Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.