Upfront Chain-of-Thought: A Cooperative Framework for Chain-of-Thought Compression

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08647v1
• Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 06:34:31 GMT
• Title: Upfront Chain-of-Thought: A Cooperative Framework for Chain-of-Thought Compression
• Authors: Chengzhengxu Li, Xiaoming Liu, Zhaohan Zhang, Shaochu Zhang, Shengchao Liu, Guoxin Ma, Yu Lan, Chao Shen,
• Abstract summary: Upfront CoT (UCoT) is an efficient reasoning framework with upfront thought embedding to automate Chain-of-Thought (CoT) compression.<n>UCoT maintains the powerful reasoning ability of executor while significantly reducing the length of CoT.
• Score: 29.354544133745453
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent developments have enabled advanced reasoning in Large Language Models (LLMs) via long Chain-of-Thought (CoT), while long CoT suffers from high computational costs and significant latency losses owing to the autoregressive nature of generative LLMs. CoT compression aims to improve efficiency in the reasoning process by reducing output length. Previous works trade reasoning efficiency by either laborious discrete prompt designing or the construction of external compressed CoT datasets that sacrifice key reasoning details. In this work, we propose Upfront CoT (UCoT): an efficient reasoning framework with upfront thought embedding to automate CoT compression. UCoT is a cooperative workflow involving a small model (compressor) and a large model (executor). The first stage of UCoT trains compressor to generate upfront thought embeddings rich in reasoning information for the executor, avoiding the drawbacks of manually designed prompts. The second stage optimizes executor to utilize upfront thought embeddings to derive the correct answer with short reasoning, using a reward mechanism. Extensive experiments show that UCoT maintains the powerful reasoning ability of executor while significantly reducing the length of CoT. It is worth mentioning that when applying UCoT to the Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct model, the usage of tokens on GSM8K dataset is reduced by 50\%, while the performance is 3.08\% higher than that of the state-of-the-art (SOTA) method. The code and dataset are in supplementary material.

Related papers

• Towards Efficient Large Language Reasoning Models via Extreme-Ratio Chain-of-Thought Compression [55.63153956934198]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning successfully enhances the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Existing CoT compression methods often suffer from a critical loss of logical fidelity at high compression ratios.<n>We propose a novel EXTreme-RAtio Chain-of-Thought Compression framework, termed Extra-CoT, which aggressively reduces the token budget while preserving answer accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-09T06:57:15Z)
• CtrlCoT: Dual-Granularity Chain-of-Thought Compression for Controllable Reasoning [29.057579417751203]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting improves LLM reasoning but incurs high latency and memory cost due to verbose traces.<n>We propose textbfCtrlCoT, a dual-granularity CoT compression framework that harmonizes semantic abstraction and token-level pruning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-28T10:38:49Z)
• Reasoning Efficiently Through Adaptive Chain-of-Thought Compression: A Self-Optimizing Framework [10.148124073650349]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning enhances Large Language Models (LLMs)<n>Longer outputs increase latency, memory usage, and KV-cache demands.<n>We propose SEER (Self-Enhancing Efficient Reasoning), an adaptive framework that compresses CoT while preserving accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-17T15:33:44Z)
• R-Stitch: Dynamic Trajectory Stitching for Efficient Reasoning [80.104336426172]
  Chain-of-thought (CoT) enhances problem-solving ability of large language models.<n>CoT incurs substantial inference cost due to long autoregressive trajectories.<n>We introduce R-Stitch, a training-free hybrid decoding framework.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-23T08:14:36Z)
• A*-Thought: Efficient Reasoning via Bidirectional Compression for Low-Resource Settings [60.48717743667377]
  A*-Thought is an efficient tree search-based unified framework designed to identify and isolate the most essential thoughts.<n>It formulates the reasoning process of LRMs as a search tree, where each node represents a reasoning span in the giant reasoning space.<n>It can improve the performance of QwQ-32B by 2.39$times$ with low-budget and reduce the length of the output token by nearly 50% with high-budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-30T12:58:34Z)
• Reinforced Latent Reasoning for LLM-based Recommendation [92.56166822197919]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive reasoning capabilities in complex problem-solving tasks.<n>Existing methods typically rely on fine-tuning with explicit chain-of-thought (CoT) data.<n>In this work, we explore an alternative approach that shifts from explicit CoT reasoning to compact, information-dense latent reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-25T11:03:45Z)
• Think Silently, Think Fast: Dynamic Latent Compression of LLM Reasoning Chains [15.89404914539006]
  We introduce Compressed Latent Reasoning (CoLaR), a novel framework that dynamically compresses reasoning processes in latent space.<n>CoLaR achieves 14.1% higher accuracy than latent-based baseline methods at comparable compression ratios.<n>Our RL-enhanced CoLaR demonstrates performance gains of up to 5.4% while dramatically reducing latent reasoning chain length by 82.8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-22T11:40:26Z)
• Fractured Chain-of-Thought Reasoning [61.647243580650446]
  We introduce Fractured Sampling, a unified inference-time strategy that interpolates between full CoT and solution-only sampling.<n>We show that Fractured Sampling consistently achieves superior accuracy-cost trade-offs, yielding steep log-linear scaling gains in Pass@k versus token budget.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T11:30:41Z)
• Efficient Reasoning Models: A Survey [73.00621058885054]
  This survey aims to provide a comprehensive overview of recent advances in efficient reasoning.<n>It categorizes existing works into three key directions: (1) shorter - compressing lengthy CoTs into concise yet effective reasoning chains; (2) smaller - developing compact language models with strong reasoning capabilities; and (3) faster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-15T06:28:00Z)
• CoT-Valve: Length-Compressible Chain-of-Thought Tuning [50.196317781229496]
  We introduce a new tuning and inference strategy named CoT-Valve, designed to allow models to generate reasoning chains of varying lengths.<n>We show that CoT-Valve successfully enables controllability and compressibility of the chain and shows better performance than the prompt-based control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T18:52:36Z)
• C3oT: Generating Shorter Chain-of-Thought without Compromising Effectiveness [18.073777359647515]
  Chain-of-Thought (CoT) before deriving the answer can improve the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>However, the length of the generated CoT is much longer than the desired final answer, which results in additional decoding costs.<n>This paper presents a CoT compression framework that involves a compressor to compress an original longer CoT into a shorter CoT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-16T11:12:45Z)
• Expediting and Elevating Large Language Model Reasoning via Hidden Chain-of-Thought Decoding [14.175444025026508]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in tasks requiring chain-of-thought (CoT) prompting. generating the full CoT process results in significantly longer output sequences, leading to increased computational costs and latency during inference. We propose a novel approach to compress the CoT process through semantic alignment, enabling more efficient decoding while preserving the benefits of CoT reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-13T06:29:20Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.