Rethinking How We Discuss the Guidance of Student Researchers in Computing

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.08885v2
• Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 20:27:04 GMT
• Title: Rethinking How We Discuss the Guidance of Student Researchers in Computing
• Authors: Shomir Wilson,
• Abstract summary: I examine the guidance of student researchers in computing within a facet framework.<n>By expanding and disambiguating the language of guidance, this approach reveals the full breadth of faculty responsibilities.<n>I argue that an over-reliance on singular terms like advising or mentoring obscures the full scope of faculty responsibilities.
• Score: 3.6846744597311294
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Computing faculty at research universities are often expected to guide the work of undergraduate and graduate student researchers. This guidance is typically called advising or mentoring, but these terms belie the complexity of the relationship, which includes several related but distinct roles. I examine the guidance of student researchers in computing (abbreviated to research guidance or guidance throughout) within a facet framework, creating an inventory of roles that faculty members can hold. By expanding and disambiguating the language of guidance, this approach reveals the full breadth of faculty responsibilities toward student researchers, and it facilitates discussing conflicts between those responsibilities. Additionally, the facet framework permits greater flexibility for students seeking guidance, allowing them a robust support network without implying inadequacy in an individual faculty member's skills. I further argue that an over-reliance on singular terms like advising or mentoring for the guidance of student researchers obscures the full scope of faculty responsibilities and interferes with improvement of those as skills. Finally, I provide suggestions for how the facet framework can be utilized by faculty and institutions, and how parts of it can be discussed with students for their benefit.

Related papers

• Agentic Reasoning for Large Language Models [122.81018455095999]
  Reasoning is a fundamental cognitive process underlying inference, problem-solving, and decision-making.<n>Large language models (LLMs) demonstrate strong reasoning capabilities in closed-world settings, but struggle in open-ended and dynamic environments.<n>Agentic reasoning marks a paradigm shift by reframing LLMs as autonomous agents that plan, act, and learn through continual interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-18T18:58:23Z)
• Thinker: Training LLMs in Hierarchical Thinking for Deep Search via Multi-Turn Interaction [57.67217258741752]
  Thinker is a hierarchical thinking model for deep search through multi-turn interaction.<n>It decomposes complex problems into independently solvable sub-problems.<n> dependencies between sub-problems are passed as parameters via these logical functions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-11T07:48:45Z)
• Thinking Like a Student: AI-Supported Reflective Planning in a Theory-Intensive Computer Science Course [1.5229257192293202]
  In the aftermath of COVID-19, many universities implemented supplementary "reinforcement" roles to support students in demanding courses.<n>This paper reports on the redesign of reinforcement sessions in a challenging undergraduate course on formal methods and computational models.<n>The intervention received positive student feedback, indicating increased confidence, reduced anxiety, and improved clarity.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T12:35:18Z)
• Beyond Automation: Socratic AI, Epistemic Agency, and the Implications of the Emergence of Orchestrated Multi-Agent Learning Architectures [0.0]
  Generative AI is no longer a peripheral tool in higher education.<n>This paper presents findings from a controlled experiment evaluating a Socratic AI Tutor.<n>Students using the Tutor reported significantly greater support for critical, independent, and reflective thinking.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-07T07:49:03Z)
• Learning to Assist Humans without Inferring Rewards [65.28156318196397]
  We build upon prior work that studies assistance through the lens of empowerment.<n>An assistive agent aims to maximize the influence of the human's actions.<n>We prove that these representations estimate a similar notion of empowerment to that studied by prior work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T21:31:04Z)
• YA-TA: Towards Personalized Question-Answering Teaching Assistants using Instructor-Student Dual Retrieval-augmented Knowledge Fusion [13.225018761886743]
  We propose a novel Virtual Teaching Assistant (VTA) named YA-TA, designed to offer responses to students grounded in lectures and are easy to understand. We introduce the Dual Retrieval-augmented Knowledge Fusion (DRAKE) framework, which incorporates dual retrieval of instructor and student knowledge and knowledge fusion for tailored response generation. We offer additional extensions of YA-TA, such as a Q&A board and self-practice tools to enhance the overall learning experience.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-31T05:37:51Z)
• Igniting Language Intelligence: The Hitchhiker's Guide From Chain-of-Thought Reasoning to Language Agents [80.5213198675411]
  Large language models (LLMs) have dramatically enhanced the field of language intelligence. LLMs leverage the intriguing chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning techniques, obliging them to formulate intermediate steps en route to deriving an answer. Recent research endeavors have extended CoT reasoning methodologies to nurture the development of autonomous language agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:30:55Z)
• Ask-AC: An Initiative Advisor-in-the-Loop Actor-Critic Framework [41.04606578479283]
  We introduce a novel initiative advisor-in-the-loop actor-critic framework, termed as Ask-AC. At the heart of Ask-AC are two complementary components, namely action requester and adaptive state selector. Experimental results on both stationary and non-stationary environments demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly improves the learning efficiency of the agent.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-05T10:58:11Z)
• Rethinking Explainability as a Dialogue: A Practitioner's Perspective [57.87089539718344]
  We ask doctors, healthcare professionals, and policymakers about their needs and desires for explanations. Our study indicates that decision-makers would strongly prefer interactive explanations in the form of natural language dialogues. Considering these needs, we outline a set of five principles researchers should follow when designing interactive explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-03T22:17:21Z)
• Learning on a Budget via Teacher Imitation [0.5185131234265025]
  Action advising is a framework that provides a flexible way to transfer such knowledge in the form of actions between teacher-student peers. We extend the idea of advice reusing via teacher imitation to construct a unified approach that addresses both advice collection and advice utilisation problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-17T04:15:00Z)
• Who does what? Work division and allocation strategies of computer science student teams [5.863264019032882]
  The aim of this research is to gain insight into the work division and allocation strategies applied by computer science students during group assignments. Motivated primarily by grade and efficiency factors, students choose and allocate tasks based on their prior expertise and preferences. Based on our findings, we argue that the setup of group assignments can limit student motivation for practicing new software engineering skills.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-04T12:27:07Z)
• How Does a Student-Centered Course on Communication and Professional Skills Impact Students in the Long Run? [0.0]
  This paper presents a long-term study about the effects of a student-centered course on students' thoughts, attitudes, and behavior. The course is offered at a European university as part of a computer science master's program. Our findings suggest that the course provided significant learning for the vast majority of respondents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-04T10:51:40Z)
• Dual Policy Distillation [58.43610940026261]
  Policy distillation, which transfers a teacher policy to a student policy, has achieved great success in challenging tasks of deep reinforcement learning. In this work, we introduce dual policy distillation(DPD), a student-student framework in which two learners operate on the same environment to explore different perspectives of the environment. The key challenge in developing this dual learning framework is to identify the beneficial knowledge from the peer learner for contemporary learning-based reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-07T06:49:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.