The Impact of Sanctions on decentralised Privacy Tools: A Case Study of Tornado Cash

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.09443v2
• Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 09:46:22 GMT
• Title: The Impact of Sanctions on decentralised Privacy Tools: A Case Study of Tornado Cash
• Authors: Raffaele Cristodaro, Benjamin Kraner, Claudio J. Tessone,
• Abstract summary: Tornado Cash is a smart contract protocol designed to enhance transaction privacy.<n>U.S. Department of the Treasury imposed sanctions against Tornado Cash in August 2022.<n>We document a significant and sustained reduction in transaction volume, user diversity, and overall protocol utilization after the sanctions were imposed.
• Score: 0.9503773054285557
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper investigates the impact of sanctions on Tornado Cash, a smart contract protocol designed to enhance transaction privacy. Following the U.S. Department of the Treasury's sanctions against Tornado Cash in August 2022, platform activity declined sharply. We document a significant and sustained reduction in transaction volume, user diversity, and overall protocol utilization after the sanctions were imposed. Our analysis draws on transaction data from three major blockchains: Ethereum, BNB Smart Chain, and Polygon. We further examine developments following the partial lifting and eventual removal of sanctions by the U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) in March 2025. Although activity partially recovered, the rebound remained limited. The Tornado Cash case illustrates how regulatory interventions can affect decentralized protocols, while also highlighting the challenges of fully enforcing such measures in decentralized environments.

Related papers

• Sedna: Sharding transactions in multiple concurrent proposer blockchains [42.71280924071485]
  We present Sedna, a user-facing protocol that replaces naive transaction replication with verifiable, rateless coding.<n>We prove Sedna guarantees liveness and emphuntil-decode privacy, significantly reducing MEV exposure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-18T20:12:55Z)
• The Loss of Control Playbook: Degrees, Dynamics, and Preparedness [39.39076397908963]
  This report addresses the absence of an actionable definition for Loss of Control (LoC) in AI systems by developing a novel taxonomy and preparedness framework.<n>We propose a graded LoC taxonomy, based on the metrics of severity and persistence, that distinguishes between Deviation, Bounded LoC, and Strict LoC.<n>We put forward a plan to maintain preparedness and prevent the occurrence of LoC outcomes should a state of societal vulnerability be reached.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T20:10:39Z)
• On-Chain Decentralized Learning and Cost-Effective Inference for DeFi Attack Mitigation [4.37137147573556]
  Billions of dollars are lost every year in DeFi platforms by transactions exploiting business logic or accounting vulnerabilities.<n>We present the first decentralized, fully on-chain learning framework that: (i) performs gas-prohibitive computation on Layer-2 to reduce cost, (ii) propagates verified model updates to Layer-1, and (iii) enables gas-bounded low-latency inference inside smart contracts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-15T18:58:34Z)
• Evasion Under Blockchain Sanctions [4.628221465696738]
  Sanctioning blockchain addresses has become a common regulatory response to malicious activities.<n>We quantitatively assess the effectiveness of U.S. Office of Foreign Assets Control (OFAC) sanctions over a 957-day period, covering 6.79 million blocks and 1.07 billion transactions.<n>Our analysis reveals that while OFAC sanctions reduced overall Tornado Cash deposit volume by 71.03%, attackers still relied on Tornado Cash in 78.33% of security incidents, underscoring persistent evasion strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-15T20:44:29Z)
• Hybrid Stabilization Protocol for Cross-Chain Digital Assets Using Adaptor Signatures and AI-Driven Arbitrage [0.2621730497733947]
  Stablecoins face an unresolved trilemma of balancing decentralization, stability, and regulatory compliance.<n>We present a hybrid cryptographic stabilization protocol that combines crypto-collateralized reserves, algorithmic futures contracts, and cross-chain pools.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-06T03:14:05Z)
• Demystifying Private Transactions and Their Impact in PoW and PoS Ethereum [43.548299433042835]
  Private transactions, a specialized transaction type employed to evade public Peer-to-Peer (P2P) network broadcasting, remain largely unexplored.<n>We analyze large-scale datasets comprising 14,810,392 private transactions within a 15.5-month Proof-of-Work (PoW) dataset and 30,062,232 private transactions within a 15.5-month Proof-of-Stake (PoS) dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T16:45:18Z)
• Real AI Agents with Fake Memories: Fatal Context Manipulation Attacks on Web3 Agents [36.49717045080722]
  This paper investigates the vulnerabilities of AI agents within blockchain-based financial ecosystems when exposed to adversarial threats in real-world scenarios.<n>We introduce the concept of context manipulation -- a comprehensive attack vector that exploits unprotected context surfaces.<n>Using ElizaOS, we showcase that malicious injections into prompts or historical records can trigger unauthorized asset transfers and protocol violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-20T15:44:31Z)
• Phantom Events: Demystifying the Issues of Log Forgery in Blockchain [31.570414211726888]
  We present the first in-depth security analysis of transaction log forgery in EVM-based blockchains.<n>We propose a tool designed to detect event forgery vulnerabilities in smart contracts.<n>We have successfully identified real-world instances for all five types of attacks across multiple decentralized applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-19T08:07:26Z)
• Assessing the Impact of Sanctions in the Crypto Ecosystem: Effective Measures or Ineffective Deterrents? [0.0]
  This study examines the impact of sanctions on entities' crypto activities. It shows that while sanctions have been effective for half of the examined entities, the others continue to move funds through sanctioned addresses. Punishment entities demonstrate a preference for utilising rapid exchange services to convert their funds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-16T06:43:45Z)
• Decoding SEC Actions: Enforcement Trends through Analyzing Blockchain litigation using LLM-based Thematic Factor Mapping [2.588523595733474]
  This study focuses on U.S. litigation against blockchain entities, particularly by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) given its influence on global crypto regulation. We map all SEC complaints against blockchain companies from 2012 to 2024 to thematic factors conceptualized by our study to delineate the factors driving SEC actions. We quantify the thematic factors and assess their influence on specific legal Acts cited within the complaints on an annual basis, allowing us to discern the regulatory emphasis, patterns and conduct trend analysis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T19:30:59Z)
• PoW Security-Latency under Random Delays and the Effect of Transaction Fees [33.689236895881216]
  Recent studies have shown that PoW protocol is secure under random delay models as well. We analyze the security-latency problem, i.e., how secure a block is, after it becomes k-deep in the blockchain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-07T17:57:31Z)
• Blockchain Large Language Models [65.7726590159576]
  This paper presents a dynamic, real-time approach to detecting anomalous blockchain transactions. The proposed tool, BlockGPT, generates tracing representations of blockchain activity and trains from scratch a large language model to act as a real-time Intrusion Detection System.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-25T11:56:18Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.