A Systematic Study on Generating Web Vulnerability Proof-of-Concepts Using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.10148v1
• Date: Sat, 11 Oct 2025 10:15:38 GMT
• Title: A Systematic Study on Generating Web Vulnerability Proof-of-Concepts Using Large Language Models
• Authors: Mengyao Zhao, Kaixuan Li, Lyuye Zhang, Wenjing Dang, Chenggong Ding, Sen Chen, Zheli Liu,
• Abstract summary: We present the first empirical study of Large Language Models (LLMs)-based PoC generation for web application vulnerabilities.<n>Our results show that LLMs can automatically generate working PoCs in 8%-34% of cases using only public data.<n>Further analysis shows that supplementing code context improves success rates by 17%-20%, with function-level providing 9%-13% improvement.
• Score: 13.035038702785512
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have brought remarkable progress in code understanding and reasoning, creating new opportunities and raising new concerns for software security. Among many downstream tasks, generating Proof-of-Concept (PoC) exploits plays a central role in vulnerability reproduction, comprehension, and mitigation. While previous research has focused primarily on zero-day exploitation, the growing availability of rich public information accompanying disclosed CVEs leads to a natural question: can LLMs effectively use this information to automatically generate valid PoCs? In this paper, we present the first empirical study of LLM-based PoC generation for web application vulnerabilities, focusing on the practical feasibility of leveraging publicly disclosed information. We evaluate GPT-4o and DeepSeek-R1 on 100 real-world and reproducible CVEs across three stages of vulnerability disclosure: (1) newly disclosed vulnerabilities with only descriptions, (2) 1-day vulnerabilities with patches, and (3) N-day vulnerabilities with full contextual code. Our results show that LLMs can automatically generate working PoCs in 8%-34% of cases using only public data, with DeepSeek-R1 consistently outperforming GPT-4o. Further analysis shows that supplementing code context improves success rates by 17%-20%, with function-level providing 9%-13% improvement than file-level ones. Further integrating adaptive reasoning strategies to prompt refinement significantly improves success rates to 68%-72%. Our findings suggest that LLMs could reshape vulnerability exploitation dynamics. To date, 23 newly generated PoCs have been accepted by NVD and Exploit DB.

Related papers

• CVE-Factory: Scaling Expert-Level Agentic Tasks for Code Security Vulnerability [50.57373283154859]
  We present CVE-Factory, the first multiagent framework to achieve expert-level quality in automatically transforming vulnerability tasks.<n>It is also evaluated on the latest realistic vulnerabilities and achieves a 66.2% verified success.<n>We synthesize over 1,000 executable training environments, the first large-scale scaling of agentic tasks in code security.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-03T02:27:16Z)
• AI Security Beyond Core Domains: Resume Screening as a Case Study of Adversarial Vulnerabilities in Specialized LLM Applications [71.27518152526686]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at text comprehension and generation, making them ideal for automated tasks like code review and content moderation.<n>LLMs can be manipulated by "adversarial instructions" hidden in input data, such as resumes or code, causing them to deviate from their intended task.<n>This paper introduces a benchmark to assess this vulnerability in resume screening, revealing attack success rates exceeding 80% for certain attack types.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-23T08:42:09Z)
• External Data Extraction Attacks against Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [70.47869786522782]
  RAG has emerged as a key paradigm for enhancing large language models (LLMs)<n>RAG introduces new risks of external data extraction attacks (EDEAs), where sensitive or copyrighted data in its knowledge base may be extracted verbatim.<n>We present the first comprehensive study to formalize EDEAs against retrieval-augmented LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-03T12:53:45Z)
• PoCGen: Generating Proof-of-Concept Exploits for Vulnerabilities in Npm Packages [13.877936187495555]
  We present PoCGen, a novel approach to autonomously generate and validate PoC exploits for vulnerabilities in npm packages.<n>PoCGen successfully generates exploits for 77% of the vulnerabilities in the SecBench$.$js dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T12:37:33Z)
• Critique-GRPO: Advancing LLM Reasoning with Natural Language and Numerical Feedback [59.078756231841574]
  Critique-GRPO is an online RL framework that integrates both natural language and numerical feedback for effective policy optimization.<n>We show Critique-GRPO consistently outperforms supervised learning and RL-based fine-tuning methods across eight challenging mathematical, STEM, and general reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T17:39:02Z)
• CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Real-World Cybersecurity Capabilities at Scale [45.97598662617568]
  We introduce CyberGym, a large-scale benchmark featuring 1,507 real-world vulnerabilities across 188 software projects.<n>We show that CyberGym leads to the discovery of 35 zero-day vulnerabilities and 17 historically incomplete patches.<n>These results underscore that CyberGym is not only a robust benchmark for measuring AI's progress in cybersecurity but also a platform for creating direct, real-world security impact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:35:14Z)
• Large Language Models for In-File Vulnerability Localization Can Be "Lost in the End" [6.6389862916575275]
  New development practice requires researchers to investigate whether commonly used LLMs can effectively analyze large file-sized inputs.<n>This paper is to evaluate the effectiveness of several state-of-the-art chat-based LLMs, including the GPT models, in detecting in-file vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-09T14:51:15Z)
• The Dual-use Dilemma in LLMs: Do Empowering Ethical Capacities Make a Degraded Utility? [54.18519360412294]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) must balance between rejecting harmful requests for safety and accommodating legitimate ones for utility.<n>This paper presents a Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) based alignment framework that achieves better overall performance.<n>We analyze experimental results obtained from testing DeepSeek-R1 on our benchmark and reveal the critical ethical concerns raised by this highly acclaimed model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-20T06:35:01Z)
• ADVLLM: Iterative Self-Tuning LLMs for Enhanced Jailbreaking Capabilities [63.603861880022954]
  We introduce ADV-LLM, an iterative self-tuning process that crafts adversarial LLMs with enhanced jailbreak ability.<n>Our framework significantly reduces the computational cost of generating adversarial suffixes while achieving nearly 100% ASR on various open-source LLMs.<n>It exhibits strong attack transferability to closed-source models, achieving 99% ASR on GPT-3.5 and 49% ASR on GPT-4, despite being optimized solely on Llama3.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-24T06:36:12Z)
• VulScribeR: Exploring RAG-based Vulnerability Augmentation with LLMs [19.45598962972431]
  VulScribeR is a novel solution that leverages carefully curated prompt templates to augment vulnerable datasets.<n>Our approach beats two SOTA methods Vulgen and VGX, and Random Oversampling (ROS) by 27.48%, 27.93%, and 15.41% in f1-score with 5K generated vulnerable samples.<n>Our approach demonstrates its feasibility for large-scale data augmentation by generating 1K samples at as cheap as US$ 1.88.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T23:22:58Z)
• Exploring Automatic Cryptographic API Misuse Detection in the Era of LLMs [60.32717556756674]
  This paper introduces a systematic evaluation framework to assess Large Language Models in detecting cryptographic misuses. Our in-depth analysis of 11,940 LLM-generated reports highlights that the inherent instabilities in LLMs can lead to over half of the reports being false positives. The optimized approach achieves a remarkable detection rate of nearly 90%, surpassing traditional methods and uncovering previously unknown misuses in established benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-23T15:31:26Z)
• LLM Agents can Autonomously Exploit One-day Vulnerabilities [2.3999111269325266]
  We show that LLM agents can autonomously exploit one-day vulnerabilities in real-world systems. Our GPT-4 agent requires the CVE description for high performance. Our findings raise questions around the widespread deployment of highly capable LLM agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-11T22:07:19Z)
• Unveiling Hidden Links Between Unseen Security Entities [3.7138962865789353]
  VulnScopper is an innovative approach that utilizes multi-modal representation learning, combining Knowledge Graphs (KG) and Natural Processing (NLP) We evaluate VulnScopper on two major security datasets, the National Vulnerability Database (NVD) and the Red Hat CVE database. Our results show that VulnScopper outperforms existing methods, achieving up to 78% Hits@10 accuracy in linking CVEs to Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures (CWEs), and Common Platform Languageions (CPEs)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-04T13:14:39Z)
• Understanding the Effectiveness of Large Language Models in Detecting Security Vulnerabilities [12.82645410161464]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of 16 pre-trained Large Language Models on 5,000 code samples from five diverse security datasets. Overall, LLMs show modest effectiveness in detecting vulnerabilities, obtaining an average accuracy of 62.8% and F1 score of 0.71 across datasets. We find that advanced prompting strategies that involve step-by-step analysis significantly improve performance of LLMs on real-world datasets in terms of F1 score (by upto 0.18 on average)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-16T13:17:20Z)
• Prompting GPT-3 To Be Reliable [117.23966502293796]
  This work decomposes reliability into four facets: generalizability, fairness, calibration, and factuality. We find that GPT-3 outperforms smaller-scale supervised models by large margins on all these facets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-17T14:52:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.