Survey Response Generation: Generating Closed-Ended Survey Responses In-Silico with Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.11586v1
• Date: Mon, 13 Oct 2025 16:29:19 GMT
• Title: Survey Response Generation: Generating Closed-Ended Survey Responses In-Silico with Large Language Models
• Authors: Georg Ahnert, Anna-Carolina Haensch, Barbara Plank, Markus Strohmaier,
• Abstract summary: This paper systematically investigates the impact that various Survey Response Generation Methods have on predicted survey responses.<n>We find significant differences between the Survey Response Generation Methods in both individual-level and subpopulation-level alignment.<n>Our results show that Restricted Generation Methods perform best overall, and that reasoning output does not consistently improve alignment.
• Score: 34.9734826462006
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Many in-silico simulations of human survey responses with large language models (LLMs) focus on generating closed-ended survey responses, whereas LLMs are typically trained to generate open-ended text instead. Previous research has used a diverse range of methods for generating closed-ended survey responses with LLMs, and a standard practice remains to be identified. In this paper, we systematically investigate the impact that various Survey Response Generation Methods have on predicted survey responses. We present the results of 32 mio. simulated survey responses across 8 Survey Response Generation Methods, 4 political attitude surveys, and 10 open-weight language models. We find significant differences between the Survey Response Generation Methods in both individual-level and subpopulation-level alignment. Our results show that Restricted Generation Methods perform best overall, and that reasoning output does not consistently improve alignment. Our work underlines the significant impact that Survey Response Generation Methods have on simulated survey responses, and we develop practical recommendations on the application of Survey Response Generation Methods.

Related papers

• Individual Turing Test: A Case Study of LLM-based Simulation Using Longitudinal Personal Data [54.145424717168794]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable human-like capabilities, yet their ability to replicate a specific individual remains under-explored.<n>This paper presents a case study to investigate LLM-based individual simulation with a volunteer-contributed archive of private messaging history spanning over ten years.<n>We propose the "Individual Turing Test" to evaluate whether acquaintances of the volunteer can correctly identify which response in a multi-candidate pool most plausibly comes from the volunteer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-03-01T21:46:27Z)
• Prompts to Proxies: Emulating Human Preferences via a Compact LLM Ensemble [46.82793004650415]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated promise in emulating human-like responses across a range of tasks.<n>We propose a novel alignment framework that treats LLMs as agent proxies for human survey respondents.<n>We introduce P2P, a system that steers LLM agents toward representative behavioral patterns using structured prompt engineering, entropy-based sampling, and regression-based selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T15:08:45Z)
• Leveraging Interview-Informed LLMs to Model Survey Responses: Comparative Insights from AI-Generated and Human Data [4.774576759157642]
  Mixed methods research integrates quantitative and qualitative data but faces challenges in aligning their distinct structures.<n>This study investigates whether large language models (LLMs) can reliably predict human survey responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-28T05:57:26Z)
• LLMs Can Generate a Better Answer by Aggregating Their Own Responses [83.69632759174405]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities across tasks, yet they often require additional prompting techniques when facing complex problems.<n>We argue this limitation stems from the fact that common LLM post-training procedures lack explicit supervision for discriminative judgment tasks.<n>We propose Generative Self-Aggregation (GSA), a novel prompting method that improves answer quality without requiring the model's discriminative capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-06T05:25:43Z)
• Language Model Fine-Tuning on Scaled Survey Data for Predicting Distributions of Public Opinions [4.020002996724124]
  Large language models (LLMs) predict survey responses in advance during the early stages of survey design.<n>We propose directly fine-tuning LLMs to predict response distributions by leveraging unique structural characteristics of survey data.<n>We show that fine-tuning on SubPOP greatly improves the match between LLM predictions and human responses across various subpopulations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-24T00:31:33Z)
• SurveyX: Academic Survey Automation via Large Language Models [22.597703631935463]
  SurveyX is an efficient and organized system for automated survey generation.<n>It decomposes the survey composing process into two phases: Preparation and Generation.<n>It significantly enhances the efficacy of survey composition.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-20T17:59:45Z)
• Specializing Large Language Models to Simulate Survey Response Distributions for Global Populations [49.908708778200115]
  We are the first to specialize large language models (LLMs) for simulating survey response distributions.<n>As a testbed, we use country-level results from two global cultural surveys.<n>We devise a fine-tuning method based on first-token probabilities to minimize divergence between predicted and actual response distributions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-10T21:59:27Z)
• Groundedness in Retrieval-augmented Long-form Generation: An Empirical Study [61.74571814707054]
  We evaluate whether every generated sentence is grounded in retrieved documents or the model's pre-training data. Across 3 datasets and 4 model families, our findings reveal that a significant fraction of generated sentences are consistently ungrounded. Our results show that while larger models tend to ground their outputs more effectively, a significant portion of correct answers remains compromised by hallucinations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T14:50:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.