Gobernanza y trazabilidad "a prueba de AI Act" para casos de uso legales: un marco técnico-jurídico, métricas forenses y evidencias auditables

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.12830v1
• Date: Sun, 12 Oct 2025 07:32:55 GMT
• Title: Gobernanza y trazabilidad "a prueba de AI Act" para casos de uso legales: un marco técnico-jurídico, métricas forenses y evidencias auditables
• Authors: Alex Dantart,
• Abstract summary: The framework integrates a normative mapping of the regulation to technical controls, a forensic architecture for RAG/LLM systems, and an evaluation system with metrics weighted by legal risk.<n>We present rag-forense, an open-source implementation of the framework, accompanied by an experimental protocol to demonstrate compliance.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper presents a comprehensive governance framework for AI systems in the legal sector, designed to ensure verifiable compliance with the EU AI Act. The framework integrates a normative mapping of the regulation to technical controls, a forensic architecture for RAG/LLM systems, and an evaluation system with metrics weighted by legal risk. As a primary contribution, we present rag-forense, an open-source implementation of the framework, accompanied by an experimental protocol to demonstrate compliance. -- Este art\'iculo presenta un marco integral de gobernanza para sistemas de IA en el sector legal, dise\~nado para garantizar el cumplimiento verificable del Reglamento de IA de la UE (AI Act). El marco integra una cartograf\'ia normativa de la ley a controles t\'ecnicos, una arquitectura forense para sistemas RAG/LLM y un sistema de evaluaci\'on con m\'etricas ponderadas por el riesgo jur\'idico. Como principal contribuci\'on, se presenta rag-forense, una implementaci\'on de c\'odigo abierto del marco, acompa\~nada de un protocolo experimental para demostrar la conformidad.

Related papers

• A five-layer framework for AI governance: integrating regulation, standards, and certification [0.6875312133832078]
  The governance of artificial iintelligence (AI) systems requires a structured approach that connects high-level regulatory principles with practical implementation.<n>Existing frameworks lack clarity on how regulations translate into conformity mechanisms, leading to gaps in compliance and enforcement.<n>A five-layer AI governance framework is proposed, spanning from broad regulatory mandates to specific standards, assessment methodologies, and certification processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-14T16:19:08Z)
• Safe and Certifiable AI Systems: Concepts, Challenges, and Lessons Learned [45.44933002008943]
  This white paper presents the T"UV AUSTRIA Trusted AI framework.<n>It is an end-to-end audit catalog and methodology for assessing and certifying machine learning systems.<n>Building on three pillars - Secure Software Development, Functional Requirements, and Ethics & Data Privacy - it translates the high-level obligations of the EU AI Act into specific, testable criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-08T17:52:08Z)
• Can AI be Auditable? [3.0260353258798625]
  Auditability is the capacity of AI systems to be independently assessed for compliance with ethical, legal, and technical standards.<n>The chapter explores how auditability is being formalized through emerging regulatory frameworks, such as the EU AI Act.<n>It analyzes the challenges facing AI auditability, including technical opacity, inconsistent documentation practices, lack of standardized audit tools and metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-30T18:03:20Z)
• Explainable AI Systems Must Be Contestable: Here's How to Make It Happen [2.5875936082584623]
  This paper presents the first rigorous formal definition of contestability in explainable AI.<n>We introduce a modular framework of by-design and post-hoc mechanisms spanning human-centered interfaces, technical processes, and organizational architectures.<n>Our work equips practitioners with the tools to embed genuine recourse and accountability into AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-02T13:32:05Z)
• Watermarking Without Standards Is Not AI Governance [46.71493672772134]
  We argue that current implementations risk serving as symbolic compliance rather than delivering effective oversight.<n>We propose a three-layer framework encompassing technical standards, audit infrastructure, and enforcement mechanisms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-27T18:10:04Z)
• In-House Evaluation Is Not Enough: Towards Robust Third-Party Flaw Disclosure for General-Purpose AI [93.33036653316591]
  We call for three interventions to advance system safety.<n>First, we propose using standardized AI flaw reports and rules of engagement for researchers.<n>Second, we propose GPAI system providers adopt broadly-scoped flaw disclosure programs.<n>Third, we advocate for the development of improved infrastructure to coordinate distribution of flaw reports.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T05:09:46Z)
• Using AI Alignment Theory to understand the potential pitfalls of regulatory frameworks [55.2480439325792]
  This paper critically examines the European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act (EU AI Act) Uses insights from Alignment Theory (AT) research, which focuses on the potential pitfalls of technical alignment in Artificial Intelligence. As we apply these concepts to the EU AI Act, we uncover potential vulnerabilities and areas for improvement in the regulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:38:38Z)
• RIRAG: Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation [51.998738311700095]
  We introduce a task of generating question-passages pairs, where questions are automatically created and paired with relevant regulatory passages.<n>We create the ObliQA dataset, containing 27,869 questions derived from the collection of Abu Dhabi Global Markets (ADGM) financial regulation documents.<n>We design a baseline Regulatory Information Retrieval and Answer Generation (RIRAG) system and evaluate it with RePASs, a novel evaluation metric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T14:44:19Z)
• The risks of risk-based AI regulation: taking liability seriously [46.90451304069951]
  The development and regulation of AI seems to have reached a critical stage. Some experts are calling for a moratorium on the training of AI systems more powerful than GPT-4. This paper analyses the most advanced legal proposal, the European Union's AI Act.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-03T12:51:37Z)
• Towards an AI Accountability Policy [16.59829043755575]
  We examine how high-risk technologies have been successfully regulated at the national level.<n>We propose a tiered system of explainability and benchmarking requirements for commercial AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T17:09:28Z)
• Conformity Assessments and Post-market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulation [0.0]
  We describe and discuss the two primary enforcement mechanisms proposed in the European Artificial Intelligence Act. We argue that AIA can be interpreted as a proposal to establish a Europe-wide ecosystem for conducting AI auditing.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-09T11:59:47Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.