SAJA: A State-Action Joint Attack Framework on Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.13262v1
- Date: Wed, 15 Oct 2025 08:08:41 GMT
- Title: SAJA: A State-Action Joint Attack Framework on Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning
- Abstract summary: Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (MADRL) has shown potential for cooperative and competitive tasks such as autonomous driving and strategic gaming.<n>Models trained by MADRL are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations on states and actions.<n>We propose the State-Action Joint Attack (SAJA) framework that has a good synergistic effects.
- Score: 6.642809648633388
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Multi-Agent Deep Reinforcement Learning (MADRL) has shown potential for cooperative and competitive tasks such as autonomous driving and strategic gaming. However, models trained by MADRL are vulnerable to adversarial perturbations on states and actions. Therefore, it is essential to investigate the robustness of MADRL models from an attack perspective. Existing studies focus on either state-only attacks or action-only attacks, but do not consider how to effectively joint them. Simply combining state and action perturbations such as randomly perturbing states and actions does not exploit their potential synergistic effects. In this paper, we propose the State-Action Joint Attack (SAJA) framework that has a good synergistic effects. SAJA consists of two important phases: (1) In the state attack phase, a multi-step gradient ascent method utilizes both the actor network and the critic network to compute an adversarial state, and (2) in the action attack phase, based on the perturbed state, a second gradient ascent uses the critic network to craft the final adversarial action. Additionally, a heuristic regularizer measuring the distance between the perturbed actions and the original clean ones is added into the loss function to enhance the effectiveness of the critic's guidance. We evaluate SAJA in the Multi-Agent Particle Environment (MPE), demonstrating that (1) it outperforms and is more stealthy than state-only or action-only attacks, and (2) existing state or action defense methods cannot defend its attacks.
Related papers
- BadWAM: When World-Action Models Dream Right but Act Wrong [85.9616441469113]
World-action models (WAMs) are emerging as a promising foundation for embodied control.<n>We introduce BadWAM, a unified framework for modeling and evaluating World-Action Drift Attacks.<n>BadWAM characterizes this attack surface along two natural criteria: attack strength and stealthiness.<n>We show that our attacks substantially reduce task success rates under closed-loop execution.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-07-16T17:04:15Z) - CAMA: Exploring Collusive Adversarial Attacks in c-MARL [0.6128850124845545]
We study collusive adversarial attacks through strategically organizing a set of malicious agents into three collusive attack modes.<n>Our work fills the gap for collusive adversarial learning in c-MARL.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-03-20T18:09:54Z) - Cognitive Control Architecture (CCA): A Lifecycle Supervision Framework for Robustly Aligned AI Agents [1.014002853673217]
LLM agents are vulnerable to Indirect Prompt Injection (IPI) attacks.<n>IPI attacks hijack agent behavior by polluting external information sources.<n>We propose the Cognitive Control Architecture (CCA), a holistic framework achieving full-lifecycle cognitive supervision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-12-07T08:11:19Z) - Diffusion Guided Adversarial State Perturbations in Reinforcement Learning [33.206020320762576]
Reinforcement learning systems are vulnerable to adversarial attacks.<n>We propose SHIFT, a novel policy-agnostic diffusion-based state perturbation attack.<n>Our attack is able to generate states that are semantically different from the true states while remaining realistic and history-aligned to avoid detection.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-11-10T23:52:21Z) - Multi-granular Adversarial Attacks against Black-box Neural Ranking Models [111.58315434849047]
We create high-quality adversarial examples by incorporating multi-granular perturbations.
We transform the multi-granular attack into a sequential decision-making process.
Our attack method surpasses prevailing baselines in both attack effectiveness and imperceptibility.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-02T02:08:29Z) - Embodied Laser Attack:Leveraging Scene Priors to Achieve Agent-based Robust Non-contact Attacks [13.726534285661717]
This paper introduces the Embodied Laser Attack (ELA), a novel framework that dynamically tailors non-contact laser attacks.
For the perception module, ELA has innovatively developed a local perspective transformation network, based on the intrinsic prior knowledge of traffic scenes.
For the decision and control module, ELA trains an attack agent with data-driven reinforcement learning instead of adopting time-consuming algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-15T06:16:17Z) - Moving Forward by Moving Backward: Embedding Action Impact over Action
Semantics [57.671493865825255]
We propose to model the impact of actions on-the-fly using latent embeddings.
By combining these latent action embeddings with a novel, transformer-based, policy head, we design an Action Adaptive Policy.
We show that our AAP is highly performant even when faced, at inference-time with missing actions and, previously unseen, perturbed action space.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-04-24T17:35:47Z) - Attacking Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning by Adversarial Minority Influence [41.14664289570607]
Adrial Minority Influence (AMI) is a practical black-box attack and can be launched without knowing victim parameters.
AMI is also strong by considering the complex multi-agent interaction and the cooperative goal of agents.
We achieve the first successful attack against real-world robot swarms and effectively fool agents in simulated environments into collectively worst-case scenarios.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-02-07T08:54:37Z) - Understanding the Vulnerability of Skeleton-based Human Activity Recognition via Black-box Attack [53.032801921915436]
Human Activity Recognition (HAR) has been employed in a wide range of applications, e.g. self-driving cars.
Recently, the robustness of skeleton-based HAR methods have been questioned due to their vulnerability to adversarial attacks.
We show such threats exist, even when the attacker only has access to the input/output of the model.
We propose the very first black-box adversarial attack approach in skeleton-based HAR called BASAR.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-21T09:51:28Z) - Illusory Attacks: Information-Theoretic Detectability Matters in Adversarial Attacks [76.35478518372692]
We introduce epsilon-illusory, a novel form of adversarial attack on sequential decision-makers.
Compared to existing attacks, we empirically find epsilon-illusory to be significantly harder to detect with automated methods.
Our findings suggest the need for better anomaly detectors, as well as effective hardware- and system-level defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-07-20T19:49:09Z) - RoMFAC: A robust mean-field actor-critic reinforcement learning against
adversarial perturbations on states [2.5204420653245245]
Mean-field Actor-Critic reinforcement learning (MFAC) is well-known in the multi-agent field.
It is sensitive to state perturbations that can significantly degrade the team rewards.
This work proposes a Robust Mean-field Actor-Critic reinforcement learning (RoMFAC) that has two innovations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-05-15T09:28:53Z) - Targeted Attack on Deep RL-based Autonomous Driving with Learned Visual
Patterns [18.694795507945603]
Recent studies demonstrated the vulnerability of control policies learned through deep reinforcement learning against adversarial attacks.
This paper investigates the feasibility of targeted attacks through visually learned patterns placed on physical object in the environment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-16T04:59:06Z) - Evaluating the Robustness of Semantic Segmentation for Autonomous
Driving against Real-World Adversarial Patch Attacks [62.87459235819762]
In a real-world scenario like autonomous driving, more attention should be devoted to real-world adversarial examples (RWAEs)
This paper presents an in-depth evaluation of the robustness of popular SS models by testing the effects of both digital and real-world adversarial patches.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-08-13T11:49:09Z) - Guided Adversarial Attack for Evaluating and Enhancing Adversarial
Defenses [59.58128343334556]
We introduce a relaxation term to the standard loss, that finds more suitable gradient-directions, increases attack efficacy and leads to more efficient adversarial training.
We propose Guided Adversarial Margin Attack (GAMA), which utilizes function mapping of the clean image to guide the generation of adversaries.
We also propose Guided Adversarial Training (GAT), which achieves state-of-the-art performance amongst single-step defenses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-11-30T16:39:39Z) - Stochastic Security: Adversarial Defense Using Long-Run Dynamics of
Energy-Based Models [82.03536496686763]
The vulnerability of deep networks to adversarial attacks is a central problem for deep learning from the perspective of both cognition and security.
We focus on defending naturally-trained classifiers using Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling with an Energy-Based Model (EBM) for adversarial purification.
Our contributions are 1) an improved method for training EBM's with realistic long-run MCMC samples, 2) Expectation-Over-Transformation (EOT) defense that resolves theoretical ambiguities for defenses, and 3) state-of-the-art adversarial defense for naturally-trained classifiers and competitive defense.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-05-27T17:53:36Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.