Open Shouldn't Mean Exempt: Open-Source Exceptionalism and Generative AI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16048v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:21:06 GMT
• Title: Open Shouldn't Mean Exempt: Open-Source Exceptionalism and Generative AI
• Authors: David Atkinson,
• Abstract summary: The paper critically examines prevalent justifications for "open-source exceptionalism"<n>The conclusion is that open-source developers must be held to the same legal and ethical standards as all other actors in the technological ecosystem.
• Score: 1.8256490853231881
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Any argument that open-source generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) is inherently ethical or legal solely because it is open source is flawed. Yet, this is the explicit or implicit stance of several open-source GenAI entities. This paper critically examines prevalent justifications for "open-source exceptionalism," demonstrating how contemporary open-source GenAI often inadvertently facilitates unlawful conduct and environmental degradation without genuinely disrupting established oligopolies. Furthermore, the paper exposes the unsubstantiated and strategic deployment of "democratization" and "innovation" rhetoric to advocate for regulatory exemptions not afforded to proprietary systems. The conclusion is that open-source developers must be held to the same legal and ethical standards as all other actors in the technological ecosystem. However, the paper proposes a narrowly tailored safe harbor designed to protect legitimate, non-commercial scientific research, contingent upon adherence to specific criteria. Ultimately, this paper advocates for a framework of responsible AI development, wherein openness is pursued within established ethical and legal boundaries, with due consideration for its broader societal implications.

Related papers

• Who Owns the Knowledge? Copyright, GenAI, and the Future of Academic Publishing [0.0]
  The integration of generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) and large language models (LLMs) into scientific research and higher education presents a paradigm shift.<n>This study examines the complex intersection of AI and science, with a specific focus on the challenges posed to copyright law and the principles of open science.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T10:34:38Z)
• Never Compromise to Vulnerabilities: A Comprehensive Survey on AI Governance [211.5823259429128]
  We propose a comprehensive framework integrating technical and societal dimensions, structured around three interconnected pillars: Intrinsic Security, Derivative Security, and Social Ethics.<n>We identify three core challenges: (1) the generalization gap, where defenses fail against evolving threats; (2) inadequate evaluation protocols that overlook real-world risks; and (3) fragmented regulations leading to inconsistent oversight.<n>Our framework offers actionable guidance for researchers, engineers, and policymakers to develop AI systems that are not only robust and secure but also ethically aligned and publicly trustworthy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-12T09:42:56Z)
• The Case for Contextual Copyleft: Licensing Open Source Training Data and Generative AI [1.2776470520481564]
  This article introduces the Contextual Copyleft AI (CCAI) license, a novel licensing mechanism that extends copyleft requirements from training data to the resulting generative AI models.<n>The CCAI license offers significant advantages, including enhanced developer control, incentivization of open source AI development, and mitigation of openwashing practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T01:42:51Z)
• A Formal Model of the Economic Impacts of AI Openness Regulation [8.438080379702125]
  This paper models the strategic interactions among the creator of a general-purpose model (the generalist) and the entity that fine-tunes the general-purpose model to a specialized domain or task.<n>We present a stylized model of the regulator's choice of an open-source definition to evaluate which AI openness standards will establish appropriate economic incentives for developers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-14T07:08:31Z)
• Opening the Scope of Openness in AI [1.2894076331861155]
  The concept of openness in AI has so far been heavily inspired by the definition and community practice of open source software.<n>We argue that considering the fundamental scope of openness in different disciplines will broaden discussions.<n>Our work contributes to the recent efforts in framing openness in AI by reflecting principles and practices of openness beyond open source software.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T23:16:44Z)
• Generative AI as Digital Media [0.0]
  Generative AI is frequently portrayed as revolutionary or even apocalyptic.<n>This essay argues that such views are misguided.<n>Instead, generative AI should be understood as an evolutionary step in the broader algorithmic media landscape.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-09T08:58:17Z)
• Technology as uncharted territory: Contextual integrity and the notion of AI as new ethical ground [51.85131234265026]
  I argue that efforts to promote responsible and ethical AI can inadvertently contribute to and seemingly legitimize this disregard for established contextual norms.<n>I question the current narrow prioritization in AI ethics of moral innovation over moral preservation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-06T15:36:13Z)
• Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI [64.86989162783648]
  Applications of Generative AI (Gen AI) are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about the potential risks of the technology, and resulted in calls for tighter regulation. This regulation is likely to put at risk the budding field of open-source generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T13:37:36Z)
• Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI [94.06233419171016]
  Applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about potential risks and resulted in calls for tighter regulation. This regulation is likely to put at risk the budding field of open-source Generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T21:14:24Z)
• A Safe Harbor for AI Evaluation and Red Teaming [124.89885800509505]
  Some researchers fear that conducting such research or releasing their findings will result in account suspensions or legal reprisal. We propose that major AI developers commit to providing a legal and technical safe harbor. We believe these commitments are a necessary step towards more inclusive and unimpeded community efforts to tackle the risks of generative AI.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-07T20:55:08Z)
• Towards Responsible AI in Banking: Addressing Bias for Fair Decision-Making [69.44075077934914]
  "Responsible AI" emphasizes the critical nature of addressing biases within the development of a corporate culture. This thesis is structured around three fundamental pillars: understanding bias, mitigating bias, and accounting for bias. In line with open-source principles, we have released Bias On Demand and FairView as accessible Python packages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-13T14:07:09Z)
• Dual Governance: The intersection of centralized regulation and crowdsourced safety mechanisms for Generative AI [1.2691047660244335]
  Generative Artificial Intelligence (AI) has seen mainstream adoption lately, especially in the form of consumer-facing, open-ended, text and image generating models. The potential for generative AI to displace human creativity and livelihoods has also been under intense scrutiny. Existing and proposed centralized regulations by governments to rein in AI face criticisms such as not having sufficient clarity or uniformity. Decentralized protections via crowdsourced safety tools and mechanisms are a potential alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-02T23:25:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.