In the Mood to Exclude: Revitalizing Trespass to Chattels in the Era of GenAI Scraping

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16049v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 18:33:48 GMT
• Title: In the Mood to Exclude: Revitalizing Trespass to Chattels in the Era of GenAI Scraping
• Abstract summary: This paper argues that website owners have the right to exclude others from their websites.<n>If the scraping leads to a decrease in the website's value, then trespass to chattels should apply.
• Score: 1.8256490853231881
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: This paper argues that website owners have the right to exclude others from their websites. Accordingly, when generative AI (GenAI) scraping bots intentionally circumvent reasonable technological barriers, their conduct could be actionable as trespass to chattels. If the scraping leads to a decrease in the website's value, then trespass to chattels should apply. The prevailing judicial focus on website content and the dismissal of trespass claims absent proof of server impairment or user disruption misconstrues the nature of the website itself as a form of digital property, focusing too narrowly on what constitutes harm under a claim of trespass. By shifting analysis from content to the website itself as an integrated digital asset and illustrating the harm to the value of the chattel, this paper demonstrates that the right to exclude applies online with the same force as it does to tangible property. Courts and litigants have struggled to police large-scale scraping because copyright preemption narrows available claims, leaving copyright and its fair use defense as the primary battleground. In contrast, recognizing websites as personal property revives trespass to chattels as a meaningful cause of action, providing website owners with an enforceable exclusionary right. Such protection would disincentivize exploitative scraping, preserve incentives for content creation, aid in protecting privacy and personal data, and safeguard values of autonomy and expression. Ultimately, this paper contends that reaffirming website owners' right to exclude is essential to maintaining a fair and sustainable online environment.

Related papers

• Bypassing Copyright Protection in Diffusion-based Customization via Two-Stage Latent Feature Optimization [51.33055188976282]
  adversarial attacks have emerged as a prominent defense strategy to prevent malicious content forgery in personalized image generation.<n>We introduce Two-Stage Latent Feature Optimization (TS-LFO), an efficient and effective copyright-stealing attack against protected diffusion-based customization.<n>Extensive experiments show that TS-LFO consistently bypasses state-of-the-art (SOTA) copyright defenses and outperforms SOTA copyright attacks such as DiffPure, GrIDPure and IMPRESS.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-06-06T07:59:08Z)
• The Disintegration of Free Speech [2.28438857884398]
  This Article examines the constitutional status of AI-mediated communication under the First Amendment.<n>It argues that under existing jurisprudence, AI-generated content is protected speech.<n>The Article concludes that this doctrinal trajectory risks severing the First Amendment from its democratic foundations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-28T17:57:58Z)
• Web Intellectual Property at Risk: Preventing Unauthorized Real-Time Retrieval by Large Language Models [49.270849415269936]
  We propose a novel framework that empowers web content creators to safeguard their web-based IP from unauthorized extraction and redistribution.<n>Our method follows principled motivations and effectively addresses an intractable black-box optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T03:14:08Z)
• Putting GenAI on Notice: GenAI Exceptionalism and Contract Law [0.5076419064097734]
  scraping is conducted using pieces of code (scraping bots) that make copies of website pages.<n>One method, prohibiting scraping in the website terms of service, is loosely enforced because it is not always clear when the terms are enforceable.<n>This paper aims to clear up the confusion by describing what scraping is, how entities do it, what makes website terms of service enforceable, and what claims of damages website owners may make as a result of being scraped.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-01T16:58:02Z)
• The Liabilities of Robots.txt [9.246300945280142]
  We argue that civil doctrines offer a more balanced and sustainable framework for regulating web robot behavior.<n>We argue that clarifying liability for "robots.txt" violations is essential to addressing the growing fragmentation of the internet.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T03:16:17Z)
• PersGuard: Preventing Malicious Personalization via Backdoor Attacks on Pre-trained Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [51.458089902581456]
  We introduce PersGuard, a novel backdoor-based approach that prevents malicious personalization of specific images.<n>Our method significantly outperforms existing techniques, offering a more robust solution for privacy and copyright protection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-22T09:47:55Z)
• ExpShield: Safeguarding Web Text from Unauthorized Crawling and Language Modeling Exploitation [17.71790411163849]
  We propose ExpShiled, a proactive self-defense mechanism that mitigates sample-specific memorization via imperceptible text perturbations.<n>Our approach requires no external collaboration while maintaining original readability.<n>Even with privacy backdoors, the Membership Inference Attack (MIA) AUC drops from 0.95 to 0.55, and instance exploitation approaches zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T17:52:02Z)
• Evaluating and Mitigating IP Infringement in Visual Generative AI [54.24196167576133]
  State-of-the-art visual generative models can generate content that bears a striking resemblance to characters protected by intellectual property rights. This happens when the input prompt contains the character's name or even just descriptive details about their characteristics. We develop a revised generation paradigm that can identify potentially infringing generated content and prevent IP infringement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T06:14:18Z)
• Copyright Protection in Generative AI: A Technical Perspective [58.84343394349887]
  Generative AI has witnessed rapid advancement in recent years, expanding their capabilities to create synthesized content such as text, images, audio, and code. The high fidelity and authenticity of contents generated by these Deep Generative Models (DGMs) have sparked significant copyright concerns. This work delves into this issue by providing a comprehensive overview of copyright protection from a technical perspective.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-04T04:00:33Z)
• Consolidating Strategies for Countering Hate Speech Using Persuasive Dialogues [3.8979646385036175]
  We explore controllable strategies for generating counter-arguments to hateful comments in online conversations. Using automatic and human evaluations, we determine the best combination of features that generate fluent, argumentative, and logically sound arguments. We share developed computational models for automatically annotating text with such features, and a silver-standard annotated version of an existing hate speech dialog corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T16:31:18Z)
• A Dataset and Benchmark for Copyright Infringement Unlearning from Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [52.49582606341111]
  Copyright law confers creators the exclusive rights to reproduce, distribute, and monetize their creative works. Recent progress in text-to-image generation has introduced formidable challenges to copyright enforcement. We introduce a novel pipeline that harmonizes CLIP, ChatGPT, and diffusion models to curate a dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-04T11:14:01Z)
• Tag Your Fish in the Broken Net: A Responsible Web Framework for Protecting Online Privacy and Copyright [30.05760947688919]
  This paper introduces a user-controlled consent tagging framework for online data. With this framework, users have the ability to tag their online data at the time of transmission, and subsequently, they can track and request the withdrawal of consent for their data from the data holders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-11T21:56:16Z)
• TeD-SPAD: Temporal Distinctiveness for Self-supervised Privacy-preservation for video Anomaly Detection [59.04634695294402]
  Video anomaly detection (VAD) without human monitoring is a complex computer vision task. Privacy leakage in VAD allows models to pick up and amplify unnecessary biases related to people's personal information. We propose TeD-SPAD, a privacy-aware video anomaly detection framework that destroys visual private information in a self-supervised manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-21T22:42:55Z)
• Untargeted Backdoor Watermark: Towards Harmless and Stealthy Dataset Copyright Protection [69.59980270078067]
  We explore the untargeted backdoor watermarking scheme, where the abnormal model behaviors are not deterministic. We also discuss how to use the proposed untargeted backdoor watermark for dataset ownership verification.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T12:56:56Z)
• Quantifying the Vulnerabilities of the Online Public Square to Adversarial Manipulation Tactics [43.98568073610101]
  We use a social media model to quantify the impacts of several adversarial manipulation tactics on the quality of content. We find that the presence of influential accounts, a hallmark of social media, exacerbates the vulnerabilities of online communities to manipulation. These insights suggest countermeasures that platforms could employ to increase the resilience of social media users to manipulation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-07-13T21:12:08Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.