Web Intellectual Property at Risk: Preventing Unauthorized Real-Time Retrieval by Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2505.12655v2
• Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2025 04:55:29 GMT
• Title: Web Intellectual Property at Risk: Preventing Unauthorized Real-Time Retrieval by Large Language Models
• Authors: Yisheng Zhong, Yizhu Wen, Junfeng Guo, Mehran Kafai, Heng Huang, Hanqing Guo, Zhuangdi Zhu,
• Abstract summary: We propose a novel framework that empowers web content creators to safeguard their web-based IP from unauthorized extraction and redistribution.<n>Our method follows principled motivations and effectively addresses an intractable black-box optimization problem.
• Score: 49.270849415269936
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The protection of cyber Intellectual Property (IP) such as web content is an increasingly critical concern. The rise of large language models (LLMs) with online retrieval capabilities enables convenient access to information but often undermines the rights of original content creators. As users increasingly rely on LLM-generated responses, they gradually diminish direct engagement with original information sources, which will significantly reduce the incentives for IP creators to contribute, and lead to a saturating cyberspace with more AI-generated content. In response, we propose a novel defense framework that empowers web content creators to safeguard their web-based IP from unauthorized LLM real-time extraction and redistribution by leveraging the semantic understanding capability of LLMs themselves. Our method follows principled motivations and effectively addresses an intractable black-box optimization problem. Real-world experiments demonstrated that our methods improve defense success rates from 2.5% to 88.6% on different LLMs, outperforming traditional defenses such as configuration-based restrictions.

Related papers

• Large Language Model Unlearning for Source Code [65.42425213605114]
  PROD is a novel unlearning approach that enables LLMs to forget undesired code content while preserving their code generation capabilities.<n>Our evaluation demonstrates that PROD achieves superior balance between forget quality and model utility compared to existing unlearning approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-20T16:27:59Z)
• SUV: Scalable Large Language Model Copyright Compliance with Regularized Selective Unlearning [22.76025238218253]
  SUV is a selective unlearning framework designed to prevent Large Language Models from memorizing copyrighted content.<n>We replace verbatim copyrighted content with plausible and coherent alternatives.<n>We validate our approach using a large-scale dataset of 500 famous books.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-29T02:33:26Z)
• Vision-Language Model IP Protection via Prompt-based Learning [52.783709712318405]
  We introduce IP-CLIP, a lightweight IP protection strategy tailored to vision-language models (VLMs)<n>By leveraging the frozen visual backbone of CLIP, we extract both image style and content information, incorporating them into the learning of IP prompt.<n>This strategy acts as a robust barrier, effectively preventing the unauthorized transfer of features from authorized domains to unauthorized ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-04T08:31:12Z)
• ExpShield: Safeguarding Web Text from Unauthorized Crawling and Language Modeling Exploitation [17.71790411163849]
  We propose ExpShiled, a proactive self-defense mechanism that mitigates sample-specific memorization via imperceptible text perturbations.<n>Our approach requires no external collaboration while maintaining original readability.<n>Even with privacy backdoors, the Membership Inference Attack (MIA) AUC drops from 0.95 to 0.55, and instance exploitation approaches zero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-30T17:52:02Z)
• Look Before You Leap: Enhancing Attention and Vigilance Regarding Harmful Content with GuidelineLLM [53.79753074854936]
  Large language models (LLMs) are increasingly vulnerable to emerging jailbreak attacks.<n>This vulnerability poses significant risks to real-world applications.<n>We propose a novel defensive paradigm called GuidelineLLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-10T12:42:33Z)
• Targeting the Core: A Simple and Effective Method to Attack RAG-based Agents via Direct LLM Manipulation [4.241100280846233]
  AI agents, powered by large language models (LLMs), have transformed human-computer interactions by enabling seamless, natural, and context-aware communication.<n>This paper investigates a critical vulnerability: adversarial attacks targeting the LLM core within AI agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T18:38:30Z)
• The Best Defense is a Good Offense: Countering LLM-Powered Cyberattacks [2.6528263069045126]
  Large language models (LLMs) could soon become integral to autonomous cyber agents. We introduce novel defense strategies that exploit the inherent vulnerabilities of attacking LLMs. Our results show defense success rates of up to 90%, demonstrating the effectiveness of turning LLM vulnerabilities into defensive strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T14:07:24Z)
• When LLMs Go Online: The Emerging Threat of Web-Enabled LLMs [26.2943792874156]
  We investigate the risks associated with misuse of Large Language Models (LLMs) in cyberattacks involving personal data.<n>Specifically, we aim to understand how potent LLM agents can be when directed to conduct cyberattacks.<n>We examine three attack scenarios: the collection of Personally Identifiable Information (PII), the generation of impersonation posts, and the creation of spear-phishing emails.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T16:16:34Z)
• Enhancing the Capability and Robustness of Large Language Models through Reinforcement Learning-Driven Query Refinement [35.50259088854813]
  The capacity of large language models (LLMs) to generate honest, harmless, and helpful responses heavily relies on the quality of user prompts.<n>This study proposes a transferable and pluggable framework that refines user prompts before they are input into LLMs.<n>This strategy improves the quality of the queries, empowering LLMs to generate more truthful, benign and useful responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T16:55:28Z)
• RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired Content [62.685566387625975]
  Current mitigation strategies, while effective, are not resilient under adversarial attacks. This paper introduces Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models (RigorLLM), a novel framework designed to efficiently moderate harmful and unsafe inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T07:25:02Z)
• Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
  We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs)<n>This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities.<n>Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content.<n>We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)
• Exploiting Programmatic Behavior of LLMs: Dual-Use Through Standard Security Attacks [67.86285142381644]
  Recent advances in instruction-following large language models amplify the dual-use risks for malicious purposes. Dual-use is difficult to prevent as instruction-following capabilities now enable standard attacks from computer security. We show that instruction-following LLMs can produce targeted malicious content, including hate speech and scams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T15:57:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.