Reducing Procrastination on Programming Assignments via Optional Early Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16052v1
• Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2025 19:22:12 GMT
• Title: Reducing Procrastination on Programming Assignments via Optional Early Feedback
• Authors: Alice Gao, Victoria Sakhnini,
• Abstract summary: We designed an intervention to combat academic procrastination on programming assignments.<n>The intervention consisted of early deadlines that were not worth marks but provided additional automated feedback if students submitted their work early.<n>Our results implied that starting early alone did not improve students' grades. However, starting early and receiving additional feedback enhanced the students' grades relative to those of the rest of the students.
• Score: 1.1458853556386799
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Academic procrastination is prevalent among undergraduate computer science students. Many studies have linked procrastination to poor academic performance and well-being. Procrastination is especially detrimental for advanced students when facing large, complex programming assignments in upper-year courses. We designed an intervention to combat academic procrastination on such programming assignments. The intervention consisted of early deadlines that were not worth marks but provided additional automated feedback if students submitted their work early. We evaluated the intervention by comparing the behaviour and performance of students between a control group and an intervention group. Our results showed that the intervention encouraged significantly more students to start the assignments early. Although there was no significant difference in students' grades between the control and intervention groups, students within the intervention group who used the intervention achieved significantly higher grades than those who did not. Our results implied that starting early alone did not improve students' grades. However, starting early and receiving additional feedback enhanced the students' grades relative to those of the rest of the students. We also conducted semi-structured interviews to gain an understanding of students' perceptions of the intervention. The interviews revealed that students benefited from the intervention in numerous ways, including improved academic performance, mental health, and development of soft skills. Students adopted the intervention to get more feedback, satisfy their curiosity, or use their available time. The main reasons for not adopting the intervention include having other competing deadlines, the intervention not being worth any marks, and feeling confident about their work.

Related papers

• Brief but Impactful: How Human Tutoring Interactions Shape Engagement in Online Learning [1.3597553728687461]
  We study brief human-tutor interactions on Zoom drawn from 2,075 hours of 191 middle school students' classroom math practice.<n>Mixed-effect models reveal that engagement, measured as successful solution steps per minute, is higher during a human-tutor visit.<n>We create analytics that identify which tutor-student dialogues raise engagement the most.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-15T02:09:53Z)
• Stabilising Learner Trajectories: A Doubly Robust Evaluation of AI-Guided Student Support using Activity Theory [1.2234742322758418]
  This study evaluates an AI-guided student support system at a large university using doubly robust score matching.<n>Results indicate that the intervention effectively stabilised precarious trajectories.<n>However, effects on the speed of qualification completion were positive but statistically constrained.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-11T22:28:12Z)
• Improving Engagement and Efficacy of mHealth Micro-Interventions for Stress Coping: an In-The-Wild Study [4.704094564944504]
  The Personalized Context-aware intervention selection algorithm improves engagement and efficacy of mHealth interventions. Even brief, one-minute interventions can significantly reduce perceived stress levels. Our study contributes to the literature by introducing a personalized context-aware intervention selection algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T11:22:22Z)
• Using Assignment Incentives to Reduce Student Procrastination and Encourage Code Review Interactions [2.1684358357001465]
  This work presents an incentive system encouraging students to complete assignments many days before deadlines. Completed assignments are code reviewed by staff for correctness and providing feedback, which results in more student-instructor interactions. The incentives result in a change in student behavior with 45% of assignments completed early and 30% up to 4 days before the deadline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-25T22:17:40Z)
• Does Starting Deep Learning Homework Earlier Improve Grades? [63.20583929886827]
  Students who start a homework assignment earlier and spend more time on it should receive better grades on the assignment. Existing literature on the impact of time spent on homework is not clear-cut and comes mostly from K-12 education. We develop a hierarchical Bayesian model to help make principled conclusions about the impact on student success.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T09:34:30Z)
• Improving Students With Rubric-Based Self-Assessment and Oral Feedback [2.808134646037882]
  rubrics and oral feedback are approaches to help students improve performance and meet learning outcomes. This paper evaluates the effect of rubrics and oral feedback on student learning outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T14:48:28Z)
• Distantly-Supervised Named Entity Recognition with Adaptive Teacher Learning and Fine-grained Student Ensemble [56.705249154629264]
  Self-training teacher-student frameworks are proposed to improve the robustness of NER models. In this paper, we propose an adaptive teacher learning comprised of two teacher-student networks. Fine-grained student ensemble updates each fragment of the teacher model with a temporal moving average of the corresponding fragment of the student, which enhances consistent predictions on each model fragment against noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-13T12:14:09Z)
• Plagiarism deterrence for introductory programming [11.612194979331179]
  A class-wide statistical characterization can be clearly shared with students via an intuitive new p-value. A pairwise, compression-based similarity detection algorithm captures relationships between assignments more accurately. An unbiased scoring system aids students and the instructor in understanding true independence of effort.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-06T18:47:25Z)
• Disadvantaged students increase their academic performance through collective intelligence exposure in emergency remote learning due to COVID 19 [105.54048699217668]
  During the COVID-19 crisis, educational institutions worldwide shifted from face-to-face instruction to emergency remote teaching (ERT) modalities. We analyzed data on 7,528 undergraduate students and found that cooperative and consensus dynamics among students in discussion forums positively affect their final GPA. Using natural language processing, we show that first-year students with low academic performance during high school are exposed to more content-intensive posts in discussion forums.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-10T20:23:38Z)
• Explainable Student Performance Prediction With Personalized Attention for Explaining Why A Student Fails [0.5607676459156788]
  We propose a novel Explainable Student performance prediction method with Personalized Attention (ESPA) BiLSTM architecture extracts the semantic information in the paths with specific patterns. The ESPA consistently outperforms the other state-of-the-art models for student performance prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-15T08:45:43Z)
• The Challenges of Assessing and Evaluating the Students at Distance [77.34726150561087]
  The COVID-19 pandemic has caused a strong effect on higher education institutions with the closure of classroom teaching activities. This short essay aims to explore the challenges posed to Portuguese higher education institutions and to analyze the challenges posed to evaluation models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-30T13:13:45Z)
• Social Engagement versus Learning Engagement -- An Exploratory Study of FutureLearn Learners [61.58283466715385]
  Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) continue to see increasing enrolment, but only a small percent of enrolees completes the MOOCs. This study is particularly concerned with how learners interact with peers, along with their study progression in MOOCs. The study was conducted on the less explored FutureLearn platform, which employs a social constructivist approach and promotes collaborative learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-11T16:09:10Z)
• Graduate Employment Prediction with Bias [44.38256197478875]
  Failure of landing a job for college students could cause serious social consequences such as drunkenness and suicide. We develop a framework, i.e., MAYA, to predict students' employment status while considering biases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-27T07:30:28Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.