Escaping Model Collapse via Synthetic Data Verification: Near-term Improvements and Long-term Convergence

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16657v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 22:39:39 GMT
• Title: Escaping Model Collapse via Synthetic Data Verification: Near-term Improvements and Long-term Convergence
• Authors: Bingji Yi, Qiyuan Liu, Yuwei Cheng, Haifeng Xu,
• Abstract summary: We investigate ways to modify this synthetic retraining process to avoid model collapse.<n>Our key finding is that by injecting information through an external synthetic data verifier, synthetic retraining will not cause model collapse.
• Score: 31.751930228965467
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Synthetic data has been increasingly used to train frontier generative models. However, recent study raises key concerns that iteratively retraining a generative model on its self-generated synthetic data may keep deteriorating model performance, a phenomenon often coined model collapse. In this paper, we investigate ways to modify this synthetic retraining process to avoid model collapse, and even possibly help reverse the trend from collapse to improvement. Our key finding is that by injecting information through an external synthetic data verifier, whether a human or a better model, synthetic retraining will not cause model collapse. To develop principled understandings of the above insight, we situate our analysis in the foundational linear regression setting, showing that iterative retraining with verified synthetic data can yield near-term improvements but ultimately drives the parameter estimate to the verifier's "knowledge center" in the long run. Our theory hence predicts that, unless the verifier is perfectly reliable, the early gains will plateau and may even reverse. Indeed, these theoretical insights are further confirmed by our experiments on both linear regression as well as Variational Autoencoders (VAEs) trained on MNIST data.

Related papers

• ForTIFAI: Fending Off Recursive Training Induced Failure for AI Models [13.096745830570944]
  We introduce the Truncated-Cross-Entropy (TCE) loss function to mitigate model collapse in synthetic data.<n>TCE mitigates collapse by selectively ignoring high-confidence tokens during training, effectively filtering out likely machine-generated artifacts.<n>Our results demonstrate that confidence-aware training objectives can substantially delay collapse onset, offering a practical and generalizable tool for model robustness under synthetic-data exposure.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-10T20:06:51Z)
• A Theoretical Perspective: How to Prevent Model Collapse in Self-consuming Training Loops [55.07063067759609]
  High-quality data is essential for training large generative models, yet the vast reservoir of real data available online has become nearly depleted.<n>Models increasingly generate their own data for further training, forming Self-consuming Training Loops (STLs)<n>Some models degrade or even collapse, while others successfully avoid these failures, leaving a significant gap in theoretical understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-26T06:18:13Z)
• How to Synthesize Text Data without Model Collapse? [37.219627817995054]
  Model collapse in synthetic data indicates that iterative training on self-generated data leads to a gradual decline in performance.<n>We propose token editing on human-produced data to obtain semi-synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T09:43:39Z)
• Self-Consuming Generative Models with Curated Data Provably Optimize Human Preferences [20.629333587044012]
  We study the impact of data curation on iterated retraining of generative models. We prove that, if the data is curated according to a reward model, the expected reward of the iterative retraining procedure is maximized.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-12T21:28:28Z)
• Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires Verification [11.6055501181235]
  We investigate the use of verification on synthesized data to prevent model collapse. We show that verifiers, even imperfect ones, can indeed be harnessed to prevent model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-11T17:46:16Z)
• How Bad is Training on Synthetic Data? A Statistical Analysis of Language Model Collapse [9.59833542807268]
  Model collapse occurs when new models are trained on synthetic data generated from previously trained models. We show that model collapse cannot be avoided when training solely on synthetic data. We estimate a maximal amount of synthetic data below which model collapse can eventually be avoided.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-07T22:15:13Z)
• Is Model Collapse Inevitable? Breaking the Curse of Recursion by Accumulating Real and Synthetic Data [49.73114504515852]
  We show that replacing the original real data by each generation's synthetic data does indeed tend towards model collapse. We demonstrate that accumulating the successive generations of synthetic data alongside the original real data avoids model collapse.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-01T18:31:24Z)
• Towards Theoretical Understandings of Self-Consuming Generative Models [56.84592466204185]
  This paper tackles the emerging challenge of training generative models within a self-consuming loop. We construct a theoretical framework to rigorously evaluate how this training procedure impacts the data distributions learned by future models. We present results for kernel density estimation, delivering nuanced insights such as the impact of mixed data training on error propagation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T02:08:09Z)
• On the Stability of Iterative Retraining of Generative Models on their own Data [56.153542044045224]
  We study the impact of training generative models on mixed datasets. We first prove the stability of iterative training under the condition that the initial generative models approximate the data distribution well enough. We empirically validate our theory on both synthetic and natural images by iteratively training normalizing flows and state-of-the-art diffusion models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-30T16:41:04Z)
• Synthetic data, real errors: how (not) to publish and use synthetic data [86.65594304109567]
  We show how the generative process affects the downstream ML task. We introduce Deep Generative Ensemble (DGE) to approximate the posterior distribution over the generative process model parameters.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-16T07:30:29Z)
• Contrastive Model Inversion for Data-Free Knowledge Distillation [60.08025054715192]
  We propose Contrastive Model Inversion, where the data diversity is explicitly modeled as an optimizable objective. Our main observation is that, under the constraint of the same amount of data, higher data diversity usually indicates stronger instance discrimination. Experiments on CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Tiny-ImageNet demonstrate that CMI achieves significantly superior performance when the generated data are used for knowledge distillation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-18T15:13:00Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.