Robust Dynamic Staffing with Predictions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.16663v1
• Date: Sat, 18 Oct 2025 23:19:32 GMT
• Title: Robust Dynamic Staffing with Predictions
• Authors: Yiding Feng, Vahideh Manshadi, Rad Niazadeh, Saba Neyshabouri,
• Abstract summary: We study a natural dynamic staffing problem in which a decision-maker sequentially hires workers to meet an unknown demand revealed at the end.<n>Predictions about demand arrive over time and become increasingly accurate, while worker availability decreases.<n>This creates a fundamental trade-off between hiring early to avoid understaffing and hiring late to avoid overstaffing.
• Score: 2.005425735442993
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: We consider a natural dynamic staffing problem in which a decision-maker sequentially hires workers over a finite horizon to meet an unknown demand revealed at the end. Predictions about demand arrive over time and become increasingly accurate, while worker availability decreases. This creates a fundamental trade-off between hiring early to avoid understaffing (when workers are more available but forecasts are less reliable) and hiring late to avoid overstaffing (when forecasts are more accurate but availability is lower). This problem is motivated by last-mile delivery operations, where companies such as Amazon rely on gig-economy workers whose availability declines closer to the operating day. To address practical limitations of Bayesian models (in particular, to remain agnostic to the underlying forecasting method), we study this problem under adversarial predictions. In this model, sequential predictions are adversarially chosen uncertainty intervals that (approximately) contain the true demand. The objective is to minimize worst-case staffing imbalance cost. Our main result is a simple and computationally efficient online algorithm that is minimax optimal. We first characterize the minimax cost against a restricted adversary via a polynomial-size linear program, then show how to emulate this solution in the general case. While our base model focuses on a single demand, we extend the framework to multiple demands (with egalitarian/utilitarian objectives), to settings with costly reversals of hiring decisions, and to inconsistent prediction intervals. We also introduce a practical "re-solving" variant of our algorithm, which we prove is also minimax optimal. Finally we conduct numerical experiments showing that our algorithms outperform Bayesian heuristics in both cost and speed, and are competitive with (approximate or exact) Bayesian-optimal policies when those can be computed.

Related papers

• Deadline-Aware Online Scheduling for LLM Fine-Tuning with Spot Market Predictions [11.849924812127371]
  We show the power of prediction in enabling cost-efficient scheduling and its sensitivity to estimation errors.<n>We propose an online allocation algorithm with prediction based on the committed horizon control approach.<n>An online policy selection algorithm is developed that learns the best policy from a pool constructed by varying the parameters of both algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T05:47:27Z)
• Best of Many in Both Worlds: Online Resource Allocation with Predictions under Unknown Arrival Model [16.466711636334587]
  Online decision-makers often obtain predictions on future variables, such as arrivals, demands, and so on. Prediction accuracy is unknown to decision-makers a priori, hence blindly following the predictions can be harmful. We develop algorithms that utilize predictions in a manner that is robust to the unknown prediction accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T04:57:32Z)
• Loss Shaping Constraints for Long-Term Time Series Forecasting [79.3533114027664]
  We present a Constrained Learning approach for long-term time series forecasting that respects a user-defined upper bound on the loss at each time-step. We propose a practical Primal-Dual algorithm to tackle it, and aims to demonstrate that it exhibits competitive average performance in time series benchmarks, while shaping the errors across the predicted window.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-14T18:20:44Z)
• Zero-Regret Performative Prediction Under Inequality Constraints [5.513958040574729]
  This paper studies performative prediction under inequality constraints. We develop a robust primal-dual framework that requires only approximate up to a certain accuracy. We then propose an adaptive primal-dual algorithm for location families.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T04:54:26Z)
• Minimalistic Predictions to Schedule Jobs with Online Precedence Constraints [117.8317521974783]
  We consider non-clairvoyant scheduling with online precedence constraints. An algorithm is oblivious to any job dependencies and learns about a job only if all of its predecessors have been completed.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T13:17:15Z)
• A Universal Error Measure for Input Predictions Applied to Online Graph Problems [57.58926849872494]
  We introduce a novel measure for quantifying the error in input predictions. The measure captures errors due to absent predicted requests as well as unpredicted actual requests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-25T15:24:03Z)
• Non-Clairvoyant Scheduling with Predictions Revisited [77.86290991564829]
  In non-clairvoyant scheduling, the task is to find an online strategy for scheduling jobs with a priori unknown processing requirements. We revisit this well-studied problem in a recently popular learning-augmented setting that integrates (untrusted) predictions in algorithm design. We show that these predictions have desired properties, admit a natural error measure as well as algorithms with strong performance guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T13:18:11Z)
• Navigating to the Best Policy in Markov Decision Processes [68.8204255655161]
  We investigate the active pure exploration problem in Markov Decision Processes. Agent sequentially selects actions and, from the resulting system trajectory, aims at the best as fast as possible.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-05T09:16:28Z)
• Learning to Schedule [3.5408022972081685]
  This paper proposes a learning and scheduling algorithm to minimize the expected cumulative holding cost incurred by jobs. In each time slot, the server can process a job while receiving the realized random holding costs of the jobs remaining in the system.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-28T08:04:06Z)
• Optimal Robustness-Consistency Trade-offs for Learning-Augmented Online Algorithms [85.97516436641533]
  We study the problem of improving the performance of online algorithms by incorporating machine-learned predictions. The goal is to design algorithms that are both consistent and robust. We provide the first set of non-trivial lower bounds for competitive analysis using machine-learned predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-22T04:51:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.