Explainability of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges toward Generating Trustworthy Explanations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.17256v1
• Date: Mon, 20 Oct 2025 07:43:53 GMT
• Title: Explainability of Large Language Models: Opportunities and Challenges toward Generating Trustworthy Explanations
• Authors: Shahin Atakishiyev, Housam K. B. Babiker, Jiayi Dai, Nawshad Farruque, Teruaki Hayashi, Nafisa Sadaf Hriti, Md Abed Rahman, Iain Smith, Mi-Young Kim, Osmar R. Zaïane, Randy Goebel,
• Abstract summary: How a language model predicts the next token and generates content is not generally understandable by humans.<n>This paper investigates local explainability and mechanistic interpretability within Transformer-based large language models.
• Score: 5.676319658620339
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Large language models have exhibited impressive performance across a broad range of downstream tasks in natural language processing. However, how a language model predicts the next token and generates content is not generally understandable by humans. Furthermore, these models often make errors in prediction and reasoning, known as hallucinations. These errors underscore the urgent need to better understand and interpret the intricate inner workings of language models and how they generate predictive outputs. Motivated by this gap, this paper investigates local explainability and mechanistic interpretability within Transformer-based large language models to foster trust in such models. In this regard, our paper aims to make three key contributions. First, we present a review of local explainability and mechanistic interpretability approaches and insights from relevant studies in the literature. Furthermore, we describe experimental studies on explainability and reasoning with large language models in two critical domains -- healthcare and autonomous driving -- and analyze the trust implications of such explanations for explanation receivers. Finally, we summarize current unaddressed issues in the evolving landscape of LLM explainability and outline the opportunities, critical challenges, and future directions toward generating human-aligned, trustworthy LLM explanations.

Related papers

• Align to the Pivot: Dual Alignment with Self-Feedback for Multilingual Math Reasoning [71.4175109189942]
  We present Pivot-Aligned Self-Feedback Multilingual Reasoning (PASMR)<n>This approach designates the model's primary language as the pivot language.<n>It establishes a cross-lingual self-feedback mechanism without relying on external correct answers or reward models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-25T03:20:00Z)
• BELL: Benchmarking the Explainability of Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models have demonstrated remarkable capabilities in natural language processing, yet their decision-making processes often lack transparency.<n>This paper introduces a standardised benchmarking technique, Benchmarking the Explainability of Large Language Models, designed to evaluate the explainability of large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-22T11:15:23Z)
• LExT: Towards Evaluating Trustworthiness of Natural Language Explanations [10.77745803401336]
  We propose a framework for quantifying trustworthiness of natural language explanations, balancing Plausibility and Faithfulness.<n>Applying our domain-agnostic framework to the healthcare domain using public medical datasets, we evaluate six models.<n>Our findings demonstrate significant differences in their ability to generate trustworthy explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-08T17:16:52Z)
• Evaluating the Reliability of Self-Explanations in Large Language Models [2.8894038270224867]
  We evaluate two kinds of such self-explanations - extractive and counterfactual.<n>Our findings reveal, that, while these self-explanations can correlate with human judgement, they do not fully and accurately follow the model's decision process.<n>We show that this gap can be bridged because prompting LLMs for counterfactual explanations can produce faithful, informative, and easy-to-verify results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-19T17:41:08Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• Evaluating Consistency and Reasoning Capabilities of Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are extensively used today across various sectors, including academia, research, business, and finance. Despite their widespread adoption, these models often produce incorrect and misleading information, exhibiting a tendency to hallucinate. This paper aims to evaluate and compare the consistency and reasoning capabilities of both public and proprietary LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T10:03:14Z)
• FaithLM: Towards Faithful Explanations for Large Language Models [67.29893340289779]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become proficient in addressing complex tasks by leveraging their internal knowledge and reasoning capabilities. The black-box nature of these models complicates the task of explaining their decision-making processes. We introduce FaithLM to explain the decision of LLMs with natural language (NL) explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T09:09:14Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• Interpretability in the Wild: a Circuit for Indirect Object Identification in GPT-2 small [68.879023473838]
  We present an explanation for how GPT-2 small performs a natural language task called indirect object identification (IOI) To our knowledge, this investigation is the largest end-to-end attempt at reverse-engineering a natural behavior "in the wild" in a language model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-01T17:08:44Z)
• Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanations [99.7035899290924]
  Language models must consider various features to predict a token, such as its part of speech, number, tense, or semantics. Existing explanation methods conflate evidence for all these features into a single explanation, which is less interpretable for human understanding. We show that contrastive explanations are quantifiably better than non-contrastive explanations in verifying major grammatical phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:32:24Z)
• Towards Interpretable Natural Language Understanding with Explanations as Latent Variables [146.83882632854485]
  We develop a framework for interpretable natural language understanding that requires only a small set of human annotated explanations for training. Our framework treats natural language explanations as latent variables that model the underlying reasoning process of a neural model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T02:05:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.