Finding the Sweet Spot: Optimal Data Augmentation Ratio for Imbalanced Credit Scoring Using ADASYN

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18252v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 03:22:43 GMT
• Title: Finding the Sweet Spot: Optimal Data Augmentation Ratio for Imbalanced Credit Scoring Using ADASYN
• Authors: Luis H. Chia,
• Abstract summary: This study systematically evaluates 10 data augmentation scenarios using the Give Me Some Credit dataset (97,243 observations, 7% default rate)<n>The optimal class imbalance ratio was found to be 6.6:1, contradicting the common practice of balancing to 1:1.<n>This work provides the first empirical evidence of an optimal "sweet spot" for data augmentation in credit scoring, with practical guidelines for industry practitioners and researchers working with imbalanced datasets.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Credit scoring models face a critical challenge: severe class imbalance, with default rates typically below 10%, which hampers model learning and predictive performance. While synthetic data augmentation techniques such as SMOTE and ADASYN have been proposed to address this issue, the optimal augmentation ratio remains unclear, with practitioners often defaulting to full balancing (1:1 ratio) without empirical justification. This study systematically evaluates 10 data augmentation scenarios using the Give Me Some Credit dataset (97,243 observations, 7% default rate), comparing SMOTE, BorderlineSMOTE, and ADASYN at different multiplication factors (1x, 2x, 3x). All models were trained using XGBoost and evaluated on a held-out test set of 29,173 real observations. Statistical significance was assessed using bootstrap testing with 1,000 iterations. Key findings reveal that ADASYN with 1x multiplication (doubling the minority class) achieved optimal performance with AUC of 0.6778 and Gini coefficient of 0.3557, representing statistically significant improvements of +0.77% and +3.00% respectively (p = 0.017, bootstrap test). Higher multiplication factors (2x and 3x) resulted in performance degradation, with 3x showing a -0.48% decrease in AUC, suggesting a "law of diminishing returns" for synthetic oversampling. The optimal class imbalance ratio was found to be 6.6:1 (majority:minority), contradicting the common practice of balancing to 1:1. This work provides the first empirical evidence of an optimal "sweet spot" for data augmentation in credit scoring, with practical guidelines for industry practitioners and researchers working with imbalanced datasets. While demonstrated on a single representative dataset, the methodology provides a reproducible framework for determining optimal augmentation ratios in other imbalanced domains.

Related papers

• A Benchmark of Causal vs Correlation AI for Predictive Maintenance [0.0]
  This study evaluates eight predictive models, ranging from baseline statistical approaches to formal causal inference methods, on a dataset of 10,000 CNC machines.<n>The formal causal inference model (L5) achieved estimated annual cost savings of 1.16 million USD (a 70.2 percent reduction), outperforming the best correlation-based decision tree model (L3) by approximately 80,000 USD per year.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-30T23:59:37Z)
• Rethinking Long-tailed Dataset Distillation: A Uni-Level Framework with Unbiased Recovery and Relabeling [105.8570596633629]
  We rethink long-tailed dataset distillation by revisiting the limitations of trajectory-based methods.<n>We adopt the statistical alignment perspective to jointly model bias and restore fair supervision.<n>Our approach improves top-1 accuracy by 15.6% on CIFAR-100-LT and 11.8% on Tiny-ImageNet-LT.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-24T07:57:01Z)
• Dissecting Long-Chain-of-Thought Reasoning Models: An Empirical Study [91.78803511141975]
  This work focuses on the roles of positive and negative samples in scaling reinforcement learning.<n>We identify substantial data inefficiency in group relative policy optimization, where over half of the samples yield zero advantage.<n>We investigate unstable performance across various reasoning models and benchmarks, attributing instability to uncertain problems with ambiguous outcomes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-05T11:47:10Z)
• Reinforcement Learning for Reasoning in Large Language Models with One Training Example [133.018487956408]
  We show that reinforcement learning with verifiable reward using one training example (1-shot RLVR) is effective in incentivizing the mathematical reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We identify some interesting phenomena during 1-shot RLVR, including cross-domain generalization, increased frequency of self-reflection, and sustained test performance improvement even after the training accuracy has saturated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-29T09:24:30Z)
• Electroencephalogram Emotion Recognition via AUC Maximization [0.0]
  Imbalanced datasets pose significant challenges in areas including neuroscience, cognitive science, and medical diagnostics.<n>This study addresses the issue class imbalance, using the Liking' label in the DEAP dataset as an example.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T19:08:27Z)
• GREAT Score: Global Robustness Evaluation of Adversarial Perturbation using Generative Models [60.48306899271866]
  We present a new framework, called GREAT Score, for global robustness evaluation of adversarial perturbation using generative models. We show high correlation and significantly reduced cost of GREAT Score when compared to the attack-based model ranking on RobustBench. GREAT Score can be used for remote auditing of privacy-sensitive black-box models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-19T14:58:27Z)
• On the Theories Behind Hard Negative Sampling for Recommendation [51.64626293229085]
  We offer two insightful guidelines for effective usage of Hard Negative Sampling (HNS) We prove that employing HNS on the Personalized Ranking (BPR) learner is equivalent to optimizing One-way Partial AUC (OPAUC) These analyses establish the theoretical foundation of HNS in optimizing Top-K recommendation performance for the first time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-07T13:57:03Z)
• Efficient, Uncertainty-based Moderation of Neural Networks Text Classifiers [8.883733362171034]
  We propose a framework for the efficient, in-operation moderation of classifiers' output. We suggest a semi-automated approach that uses prediction uncertainties to pass unconfident, probably incorrect classifications to human moderators. A series of benchmarking experiments show that our framework can improve the classification F1-scores by 5.1 to 11.2%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-04T09:07:54Z)
• Newer is not always better: Rethinking transferability metrics, their peculiarities, stability and performance [5.650647159993238]
  Fine-tuning of large pre-trained image and language models on small customized datasets has become increasingly popular. We show that the statistical problems with covariance estimation drive the poor performance of H-score. We propose a correction and recommend measuring correlation performance against relative accuracy in such settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-13T17:24:12Z)
• Re-TACRED: Addressing Shortcomings of the TACRED Dataset [5.820381428297218]
  TACRED is one of the largest and most widely used sentence-level relation extraction datasets. Proposed models that are evaluated using this dataset consistently set new state-of-the-art performance. However, they still exhibit large error rates despite leveraging external knowledge and unsupervised pretraining on large text corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-16T22:55:11Z)
• Bootstrapping Your Own Positive Sample: Contrastive Learning With Electronic Health Record Data [62.29031007761901]
  This paper proposes a novel contrastive regularized clinical classification model. We introduce two unique positive sampling strategies specifically tailored for EHR data. Our framework yields highly competitive experimental results in predicting the mortality risk on real-world COVID-19 EHR data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-07T06:02:04Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.