Evaluating LLM-Based Mobile App Recommendations: An Empirical Study

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18364v1
• Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 07:35:19 GMT
• Title: Evaluating LLM-Based Mobile App Recommendations: An Empirical Study
• Authors: Quim Motger, Xavier Franch, Vincenzo Gervasi, Jordi Marco,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to recommend mobile applications through natural language prompts.<n>We present an empirical analysis of how widely-used general purpose LLMs generate, justify, and rank mobile app recommendations.
• Score: 1.9932595193134042
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to recommend mobile applications through natural language prompts, offering a flexible alternative to keyword-based app store search. Yet, the reasoning behind these recommendations remains opaque, raising questions about their consistency, explainability, and alignment with traditional App Store Optimization (ASO) metrics. In this paper, we present an empirical analysis of how widely-used general purpose LLMs generate, justify, and rank mobile app recommendations. Our contributions are: (i) a taxonomy of 16 generalizable ranking criteria elicited from LLM outputs; (ii) a systematic evaluation framework to analyse recommendation consistency and responsiveness to explicit ranking instructions; and (iii) a replication package to support reproducibility and future research on AI-based recommendation systems. Our findings reveal that LLMs rely on a broad yet fragmented set of ranking criteria, only partially aligned with standard ASO metrics. While top-ranked apps tend to be consistent across runs, variability increases with ranking depth and search specificity. LLMs exhibit varying sensitivity to explicit ranking instructions - ranging from substantial adaptations to near-identical outputs - highlighting their complex reasoning dynamics in conversational app discovery. Our results aim to support end-users, app developers, and recommender-systems researchers in navigating the emerging landscape of conversational app discovery.

Related papers

• Rethinking On-policy Optimization for Query Augmentation [49.87723664806526]
  We present the first systematic comparison of prompting-based and RL-based query augmentation across diverse benchmarks.<n>We introduce a novel hybrid method, On-policy Pseudo-document Query Expansion (OPQE), which learns to generate a pseudo-document that maximizes retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T04:16:28Z)
• CompassVerifier: A Unified and Robust Verifier for LLMs Evaluation and Outcome Reward [50.97588334916863]
  We develop CompassVerifier, an accurate and robust lightweight verifier model for evaluation and outcome reward.<n>It demonstrates multi-domain competency spanning math, knowledge, and diverse reasoning tasks, with the capability to process various answer types.<n>We introduce VerifierBench benchmark comprising model outputs collected from multiple data sources, augmented through manual analysis of metaerror patterns to enhance CompassVerifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-05T17:55:24Z)
• Evaluating Position Bias in Large Language Model Recommendations [3.430780143519032]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are being increasingly explored as general-purpose tools for recommendation tasks.<n>We show that LLM-based recommendation models suffer from position bias, where the order of candidate items in a prompt can disproportionately influence the recommendations produced by LLMs.<n>We introduce a new prompting strategy to mitigate the position bias of LLM recommendation models called Ranking via Iterative SElection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-04T03:30:26Z)
• From Prompting to Alignment: A Generative Framework for Query Recommendation [35.654879254147964]
  We propose a Generative Query Recommendation (GQR) framework that aligns query generation with user preference.<n>Specifically, we unify diverse query recommendation tasks by a universal prompt framework.<n>We also present a CTR-alignment framework, which involves training a query-wise CTR predictor as a process reward model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T13:21:29Z)
• Utility-Focused LLM Annotation for Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [96.18720164390699]
  This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for annotating document utility in training retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems.<n>Our results show that LLM-generated annotations enhance out-of-domain retrieval performance and improve RAG outcomes compared to models trained solely on human annotations or downstream QA metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-07T16:05:52Z)
• Towards Next-Generation Recommender Systems: A Benchmark for Personalized Recommendation Assistant with LLMs [38.83854553636802]
  Large language models (LLMs) have revolutionized the foundational architecture of RecSys.<n>Most existing studies rely on fixed task-specific prompt templates to generate recommendations.<n>This is because commonly used datasets lack high-quality textual user queries that reflect real-world recommendation scenarios.<n>We introduce RecBench+, a new dataset benchmark designed to access LLMs' ability to handle intricate user recommendation needs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T13:28:23Z)
• Direct Preference Optimization for LLM-Enhanced Recommendation Systems [33.54698201942643]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited remarkable performance across a wide range of domains.<n>We propose DPO4Rec, a framework that integrates DPO into LLM-enhanced recommendation systems.<n>Extensive experiments show that DPO4Rec significantly improves re-ranking performance over strong baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-08T11:42:37Z)
• Tapping the Potential of Large Language Models as Recommender Systems: A Comprehensive Framework and Empirical Analysis [91.5632751731927]
  Large Language Models such as ChatGPT have showcased remarkable abilities in solving general tasks.<n>We propose a general framework for utilizing LLMs in recommendation tasks, focusing on the capabilities of LLMs as recommenders.<n>We analyze the impact of public availability, tuning strategies, model architecture, parameter scale, and context length on recommendation results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-10T08:28:56Z)
• LLMRec: Benchmarking Large Language Models on Recommendation Task [54.48899723591296]
  The application of Large Language Models (LLMs) in the recommendation domain has not been thoroughly investigated. We benchmark several popular off-the-shelf LLMs on five recommendation tasks, including rating prediction, sequential recommendation, direct recommendation, explanation generation, and review summarization. The benchmark results indicate that LLMs displayed only moderate proficiency in accuracy-based tasks such as sequential and direct recommendation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-23T16:32:54Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation [77.91673633328148]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) This survey presents a taxonomy that categorizes these models into two major paradigms, respectively Discriminative LLM for Recommendation (DLLM4Rec) and Generative LLM for Recommendation (GLLM4Rec)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T13:51:26Z)
• Synergistic Interplay between Search and Large Language Models for Information Retrieval [141.18083677333848]
  InteR allows RMs to expand knowledge in queries using LLM-generated knowledge collections. InteR achieves overall superior zero-shot retrieval performance compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T11:58:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.