Utility-Focused LLM Annotation for Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2504.05220v5
• Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2025 04:00:21 GMT
• Title: Utility-Focused LLM Annotation for Retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation
• Authors: Hengran Zhang, Minghao Tang, Keping Bi, Jiafeng Guo, Shihao Liu, Daiting Shi, Dawei Yin, Xueqi Cheng,
• Abstract summary: This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for annotating document utility in training retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems.<n>Our results show that LLM-generated annotations enhance out-of-domain retrieval performance and improve RAG outcomes compared to models trained solely on human annotations or downstream QA metrics.
• Score: 96.18720164390699
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: This paper explores the use of large language models (LLMs) for annotating document utility in training retrieval and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems, aiming to reduce dependence on costly human annotations. We address the gap between retrieval relevance and generative utility by employing LLMs to annotate document utility. To effectively utilize multiple positive samples per query, we introduce a novel loss that maximizes their summed marginal likelihood. Using the Qwen-2.5-32B model, we annotate utility on the MS MARCO dataset and conduct retrieval experiments on MS MARCO and BEIR, as well as RAG experiments on MS MARCO QA, NQ, and HotpotQA. Our results show that LLM-generated annotations enhance out-of-domain retrieval performance and improve RAG outcomes compared to models trained solely on human annotations or downstream QA metrics. Furthermore, combining LLM annotations with just 20% of human labels achieves performance comparable to using full human annotations. Our study offers a comprehensive approach to utilizing LLM annotations for initializing QA systems on new corpora.

Related papers

• Are Multimodal Large Language Models Good Annotators for Image Tagging? [62.01475514488922]
  This paper aims to analyze the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations.<n>We propose TagLLM, a novel framework for image tagging, which aims to narrow the gap between MLLM-generated and human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T14:53:16Z)
• Next Generation Active Learning: Mixture of LLMs in the Loop [7.786330678327967]
  We propose a novel active learning framework, replacing human annotators with labels generated through a Mixture-of-LLMs-based annotation model.<n>Our framework is built on lightweight LLMs, enabling it to operate fully on local machines in real-world applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-22T09:01:42Z)
• Can LLM Annotations Replace User Clicks for Learning to Rank? [112.2254432364736]
  Large-scale supervised data is essential for training modern ranking models, but obtaining high-quality human annotations is costly.<n>Click data has been widely used as a low-cost alternative, and with recent advances in large language models (LLMs), LLM-based relevance annotation has emerged as another promising annotation.<n> Experiments on both a public dataset, TianGong-ST, and an industrial dataset, Baidu-Click, show that click-supervised models perform better on high-frequency queries.<n>We explore two training strategies -- data scheduling and frequency-aware multi-objective learning -- that integrate both supervision signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-10T02:26:14Z)
• Rethinking On-policy Optimization for Query Augmentation [49.87723664806526]
  We present the first systematic comparison of prompting-based and RL-based query augmentation across diverse benchmarks.<n>We introduce a novel hybrid method, On-policy Pseudo-document Query Expansion (OPQE), which learns to generate a pseudo-document that maximizes retrieval performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-20T04:16:28Z)
• Just Put a Human in the Loop? Investigating LLM-Assisted Annotation for Subjective Tasks [18.695435335031355]
  In subjective annotation tasks with multiple plausible answers, reviewing LLM outputs can change the label distribution.<n>We conducted a pre-registered experiment with 410 unique annotators and over 7,000 annotations.<n>We find that presenting crowdworkers with LLM-generated annotation suggestions did not make them faster, but did improve their self-reported confidence in the task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T17:29:21Z)
• Harnessing the Power of Reinforcement Learning for Language-Model-Based Information Retriever via Query-Document Co-Augmentation [35.70731674603417]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can be used to augment both user queries and corpus documents.<n>We present an LLM-based retriever empowered to augment both user queries and corpus documents.<n>Our approach significantly enhances LLM-based retrieval performance in both sparse and dense settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-23T14:14:43Z)
• LLMs as Data Annotators: How Close Are We to Human Performance [47.61698665650761]
  Manual annotation of data is labor-intensive, time-consuming, and costly.<n>In-context learning (ICL) in which some examples related to the task are given in the prompt can lead to inefficiencies and suboptimal model performance.<n>This paper presents experiments comparing several LLMs, considering different embedding models, across various datasets for the Named Entity Recognition (NER) task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-21T11:11:07Z)
• Rank-R1: Enhancing Reasoning in LLM-based Document Rerankers via Reinforcement Learning [76.50690734636477]
  We introduce Rank-R1, a novel LLM-based reranker that performs reasoning over both the user query and candidate documents before performing the ranking task. Our experiments on the TREC DL and BRIGHT datasets show that Rank-R1 is highly effective, especially for complex queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-08T03:14:26Z)
• From Human Annotation to LLMs: SILICON Annotation Workflow for Management Research [13.818244562506138]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) provide a cost-effective and efficient alternative to human annotation. This paper introduces the SILICON" (Systematic Inference with LLMs for Information Classification and Notation) workflow. The workflow integrates established principles of human annotation with systematic prompt optimization and model selection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-19T02:21:41Z)
• Invar-RAG: Invariant LLM-aligned Retrieval for Better Generation [43.630437906898635]
  We propose a novel two-stage fine-tuning architecture called Invar-RAG. In the retrieval stage, an LLM-based retriever is constructed by integrating LoRA-based representation learning. In the generation stage, a refined fine-tuning method is employed to improve LLM accuracy in generating answers based on retrieved information.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T14:25:37Z)
• DIRAS: Efficient LLM Annotation of Document Relevance in Retrieval Augmented Generation [37.823892101215684]
  Domain-specific queries usually need nuanced definitions of relevance beyond shallow semantic relevance.<n>Human or GPT-4 annotation is costly and cannot cover all (query, document) pairs.<n>We propose DIRAS (Domain-specific Information Retrieval with Scalability), a manual-annotation-free schema.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T10:04:09Z)
• PromptReps: Prompting Large Language Models to Generate Dense and Sparse Representations for Zero-Shot Document Retrieval [76.50690734636477]
  We propose PromptReps, which combines the advantages of both categories: no need for training and the ability to retrieve from the whole corpus. The retrieval system harnesses both dense text embedding and sparse bag-of-words representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T04:51:30Z)
• Large Language Models for Data Annotation and Synthesis: A Survey [49.8318827245266]
  This survey focuses on the utility of Large Language Models for data annotation and synthesis.<n>It includes an in-depth taxonomy of data types that LLMs can annotate, a review of learning strategies for models utilizing LLM-generated annotations, and a detailed discussion of the primary challenges and limitations associated with using LLMs for data annotation and synthesis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T00:44:04Z)
• LLatrieval: LLM-Verified Retrieval for Verifiable Generation [67.93134176912477]
  Verifiable generation aims to let the large language model (LLM) generate text with supporting documents. We propose LLatrieval (Large Language Model Verified Retrieval), where the LLM updates the retrieval result until it verifies that the retrieved documents can sufficiently support answering the question. Experiments show that LLatrieval significantly outperforms extensive baselines and achieves state-of-the-art results.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T01:38:02Z)
• CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
  We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale. Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z)
• Automated Annotation with Generative AI Requires Validation [0.0]
  Generative large language models (LLMs) can be a powerful tool for augmenting text annotation procedures. We outline a workflow to harness the annotation potential of LLMs in a principled, efficient way. We find that LLM performance for text annotation is promising but highly contingent on both the dataset and the type of annotation task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T20:50:45Z)
• Query Rewriting for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models [139.242907155883]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) play powerful, black-box readers in the retrieve-then-read pipeline. This work introduces a new framework, Rewrite-Retrieve-Read instead of the previous retrieve-then-read for the retrieval-augmented LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T17:27:50Z)
• Description-Based Text Similarity [59.552704474862004]
  We identify the need to search for texts based on abstract descriptions of their content. We propose an alternative model that significantly improves when used in standard nearest neighbor search.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-21T17:14:31Z)
• Active Learning for Abstractive Text Summarization [50.79416783266641]
  We propose the first effective query strategy for Active Learning in abstractive text summarization. We show that using our strategy in AL annotation helps to improve the model performance in terms of ROUGE and consistency scores.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-09T10:33:14Z)
• Assisted Text Annotation Using Active Learning to Achieve High Quality with Little Effort [9.379650501033465]
  We propose a tool that enables researchers to create large, high-quality, annotated datasets with only a few manual annotations. We combine an active learning (AL) approach with a pre-trained language model to semi-automatically identify annotation categories. Our preliminary results show that employing AL strongly reduces the number of annotations for correct classification of even complex and subtle frames.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-15T13:14:58Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.