The Cost-Benefit of Interdisciplinarity in AI for Mental Health
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2510.18581v1
- Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2025 12:34:44 GMT
- Title: The Cost-Benefit of Interdisciplinarity in AI for Mental Health
- Abstract summary: We argue that involving experts from technology, healthcare, ethics, and law across key lifecycle phases is essential.<n>We highlight practical recommendations and existing frameworks to help balance the challenges and benefits of interdisciplinarity.
- Score: 2.7802100508587286
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Artificial intelligence has been introduced as a way to improve access to mental health support. However, most AI mental health chatbots rely on a limited range of disciplinary input, and fail to integrate expertise across the chatbot's lifecycle. This paper examines the cost-benefit trade-off of interdisciplinary collaboration in AI mental health chatbots. We argue that involving experts from technology, healthcare, ethics, and law across key lifecycle phases is essential to ensure value-alignment and compliance with the high-risk requirements of the AI Act. We also highlight practical recommendations and existing frameworks to help balance the challenges and benefits of interdisciplinarity in mental health chatbots.
Related papers
- Responsible Evaluation of AI for Mental Health [72.85175110624736]
Current approaches to evaluating AI tools in mental health care are fragmented and poorly aligned with clinical practice, social context, and first-hand user experience.<n>This paper argues for a rethinking of responsible evaluation by introducing an interdisciplinary framework that integrates clinical soundness, social context, and equity.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-20T12:55:10Z) - AI Systems in Text-Based Online Counselling: Ethical Considerations Across Three Implementation Approaches [0.0]
Text-based online counselling scales across geographical and stigma barriers, yet faces practitioner shortages, lacks non-verbal cues and suffers inconsistent quality assurance.<n>This paper analyses three AI implementation approaches - autonomous counsellor bots, AI training simulators and counsellor-facing augmentation tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2026-01-12T12:04:11Z) - A Case for Leveraging Generative AI to Expand and Enhance Training in the Provision of Mental Health Services [0.5009488052972938]
We show how generative AI can be used to enhance and scale training in mental health service provision.<n>We highlight key benefits of using generative AI to help train people to provide mental health services.<n>We illustrate why we should invest in using generative AI to support training people in mental health service provision.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-10-08T23:44:52Z) - Technological folie à deux: Feedback Loops Between AI Chatbots and Mental Illness [11.364198566966204]
We argue that individuals with mental health conditions face increased risks of chatbots-induced belief destabilization and dependence.<n>Current AI safety measures are inadequate to address these interaction-based risks.<n>To address this emerging public health concern, we need coordinated action across clinical practice, AI development, and regulatory frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-07-25T12:38:54Z) - Towards Privacy-aware Mental Health AI Models: Advances, Challenges, and Opportunities [58.61680631581921]
Mental health disorders create profound personal and societal burdens, yet conventional diagnostics are resource-intensive and limit accessibility.<n>This paper examines these challenges and proposes solutions, including anonymization, synthetic data, and privacy-preserving training.<n>It aims to advance reliable, privacy-aware AI tools that support clinical decision-making and improve mental health outcomes.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-02-01T15:10:02Z) - Artificial Intelligence in Mental Health and Well-Being: Evolution, Current Applications, Future Challenges, and Emerging Evidence [3.0655356440262334]
The paper discusses the evolution, present application, and future challenges in the field of AI for mental health and well-being.<n>The integration of AI in mental health has grown rapidly to augment traditional treatment and open innovative solutions.<n> Ethical challenges persist, however, most notably around privacy, data security, and algorithmic bias.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-13T22:06:35Z) - Harnessing Large Language Models for Mental Health: Opportunities, Challenges, and Ethical Considerations [3.0655356440262334]
Large Language Models (LLMs) are AI-driven tools that empower mental health professionals with real-time support, improved data integration, and the ability to encourage care-seeking behaviors.<n>However, their implementation comes with significant challenges and ethical concerns.<n>This paper examines the transformative potential of LLMs in mental health care, highlights the associated technical and ethical complexities, and advocates for a collaborative, multidisciplinary approach.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-13T13:18:51Z) - Enhancing Mental Health Support through Human-AI Collaboration: Toward Secure and Empathetic AI-enabled chatbots [0.0]
This paper explores the potential of AI-enabled chatbots as a scalable solution.
We assess their ability to deliver empathetic, meaningful responses in mental health contexts.
We propose a federated learning framework that ensures data privacy, reduces bias, and integrates continuous validation from clinicians to enhance response quality.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-17T20:49:13Z) - The Promise and Peril of Artificial Intelligence -- Violet Teaming
Offers a Balanced Path Forward [56.16884466478886]
This paper reviews emerging issues with opaque and uncontrollable AI systems.
It proposes an integrative framework called violet teaming to develop reliable and responsible AI.
It emerged from AI safety research to manage risks proactively by design.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-08-28T02:10:38Z) - Building Bridges: Generative Artworks to Explore AI Ethics [56.058588908294446]
In recent years, there has been an increased emphasis on understanding and mitigating adverse impacts of artificial intelligence (AI) technologies on society.
A significant challenge in the design of ethical AI systems is that there are multiple stakeholders in the AI pipeline, each with their own set of constraints and interests.
This position paper outlines some potential ways in which generative artworks can play this role by serving as accessible and powerful educational tools.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-25T22:31:55Z) - Enabling AI and Robotic Coaches for Physical Rehabilitation Therapy:
Iterative Design and Evaluation with Therapists and Post-Stroke Survivors [66.07833535962762]
Artificial intelligence (AI) and robotic coaches promise the improved engagement of patients on rehabilitation exercises through social interaction.
Previous work explored the potential of automatically monitoring exercises for AI and robotic coaches, but deployment remains a challenge.
We present our efforts on eliciting the detailed design specifications on how AI and robotic coaches could interact with and guide patient's exercises.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-06-15T22:06:39Z) - Intelligent interactive technologies for mental health and well-being [70.1586005070678]
The paper critically analyzes existing solutions with the outlooks for their future.
In particular, we:.
give an overview of the technology for mental health,.
critically analyze the technology against the proposed criteria, and.
provide the design outlooks for these technologies.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-05-11T19:04:21Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.